Everyone,
We
are setting up an email deletion policy at my organization. I have tested
and understand how the recipient policy works and the entire email deletion
process works. One thing that is a little confusing is the fact that the email
deletion policy works off a hidden
This calculation is determined by the following three MAPI
properties on a message. If any one of these properties is less than the limit
set by the Mailbox Manager rules, then we will skip that
message.
- PR_MESSAGE_DELIVERY_TIME- PR_CLIENT_SUBMIT_TIME-
PR_LAST_MODIFICATION_TIME
For th
Jeremy,
Nice name. I appreciate your
response and find this information valuable. However, this is not exactly what
I was looking for in the sense that we are fine with the way Exchange 2000
determines what should be deleted or not deleted to include the modified date.
I am
Title: Message
Does
this mean 'no additional schema mods (above and beyond previous versions)' or '
no schema mods at all, even if you have yet to deploy any previous ILO schema
mods' ?
The
latter would certainly be of interest.
neil
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTE
We have two domains
in our forest. The "empty" root domain, and a resource domain where everything
else lives. The root domain has two DCs - one each in two different
sites.
Our main domain has
several DCs, and most of those are GCs as well. The sites containing the root
DCs each also hav
Hi,
I'm trying to give
an account permission to update the userPassword field via LDAP protocol in
PHP. I have it working perfect using my Admin account. But since
that has to be stored in the PHP file I would really like to have an account
with much tighter security able to make the mod
Hi Jeremy
The problem with machines contacting DCs
in other sites could be related to your subnet definitions in AD. Check
to see that all subnets are registered in AD and are associated with the
appropriate site. Also check your DNS settings, especially on the
machines displaying th
Under normal (what ever that means) circumstances
2 GCs should certainly be able to handle 500 users.
Have you defined subnets for each of your
9 sites?
Are you certain that the clients in
question belong to one of the defined subnets?
Are your DCs registering all appropriate site
Hi Jeremy,
If you have 5 DCs and 9 sites, do you have non-DC-related
reasons to have sites? If not, you could remove all sites that don't have a DC,
and link their subnet objects to some remaining sites.
For example, if your DCs are on two AD sites, and then you
have seven DC-less locatio
Hi Yann,
You could grant your user those privileges that are listed
as User Rights, by applying a corresponding Group Policy Object to only one DC.
However, this is probably not enough for you. For example, you cannot grant a
privilege to format hard drives or share folders this way.
Your
Hi Ken,
There is (at least) one requirement for a GC in every
domain. If you don't have a GC in a domain, you cannot convert universal groups
in that domain to local groups. However, this is probably not a big concern for
your empty root domain...
Also a couple of suggestions:
- Why not
This may be a “rotten” answer
or a perfect answer… Check out TWEAKUI for Windows XP. It’s
ACCESS CONTROL section gives you “UI” ability to change very
specific activities’ permissions, e.g. creating a share, etc. You might
try it (in a lab, first of course) as far as how it works on 2003
12 matches
Mail list logo
