RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates

2005-10-10 Thread Tim Vander Kooi
Title: Schema Updates I understand your point of view completely, I have the same hang up about anything made by CA. (Not on my network.) Unity really depends on your use. The things that Cisco has changed make it awesome to use if you have an AD environment and a Cisco VOIP system.Pricey to

RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
A lot of things sucked with NT 3.50. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Freelance E-Mail Philosopher Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:51 PM To:

RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list

2005-10-10 Thread Bernard, Aric
Agreed - the legacy APIs pose a serious problem in many cases. After noodling over the LDAP issue a little more, and recalling that ports are specified in the SRV records :), any AD aware of SRV aware system/application should be able to handle multiple instances of LDAP on a single server

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
Is this address on a contact that has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a reply address? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVPFreelance E-Mail PhilosopherProtecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Monday, October 10, 2005

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates

2005-10-10 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Schema Updates It's a feature with lots of "gee whiz!" appeal, but once people see the price tag, the response is usually "ouch!" We are still waiting for the "year of UM". I'm betting on 2007. :-) From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley

RE: [ActiveDir] [OT] Movement in licensing over Virtual Instances at MS.

2005-10-10 Thread Dean Wells
They're inherently the same ... undoable disks ... they're just easier to work with (as is the whole product in my entirely VMware biased opinion). --Dean WellsMSEtechnology* Email: dwells@msetechnology.comhttp://msetechnology.com From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

Re: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Tom Kern
ok, it goes like this- i work for a finanical corp so we have to stay in compliance. i have 2 smtp connectors- one goes to a compliance server, the other to an journal host. for the journal host, all my mail stores point to an external contact(1 smtp proxy addy) for journaling. this gets routed

RE: [ActiveDir] BlackComb Super Forest Functional Mode

2005-10-10 Thread joe
Again, I am speaking legacy baggage. If you were a UNIX developer, would you rather stick to writing to old proprietary interfaces or using standards based interfaces like LDAP and Kerberos, etc. Again, all of the integration going on now is working in those areas. Those areas will move fine into

RE: [ActiveDir] Active Directory wish list

2005-10-10 Thread joe
:o) Don't even need to worry about multiple ports. It is all hierarchical. I can, for instance run 50 NCs on a single ADAM instance on a single server. I could also run 50 different instances of ADAM on 50 different ports. Which makes more sense? But otherwise yes, the SRV records coupled with

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates

2005-10-10 Thread Marcus.Oh
Title: Schema Updates Our movement for Cisco Unity was based strictly on a wholesale move to Cisco VoIP solutions all the way around. Apparently theres some cost savings there somewhere. I dunno regarding the comment joe made about not ever being in your ad environment. Concur 100%. You

Re: [ActiveDir] Results of survey - Most common cause of Active Directory failures?

2005-10-10 Thread Phil Renouf
Start a blog? :) Since that takes some time to get traffic, perhaps joe would be willing to post your survey on his blog? I imagine hegets some good traffic to his blog. Phil On 10/10/05, Gil Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We usually do a big State of the AD World survey at DEC, and

RE: [ActiveDir] exchange confusion(OT)

2005-10-10 Thread Ed Crowley [MVP]
What are the entries under E-Mail Addresses for the contact? Which SMTP address is bolded? Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVPFreelance E-Mail PhilosopherProtecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Monday,

[ActiveDir] October MVP Awards

2005-10-10 Thread Deuby, Sean P
Title: RE: [MVP-Directory Services] October MVP Awards Congratulations to our new and re-awarded Directory Services MVPs! -Sean And congratulations to Marc Scheuner - re-awarded MVP for October! _ From: Gary Wilson Sent: Monday,

RE: [ActiveDir] Schema Updates

2005-10-10 Thread Ayers, Diane
Title: Schema Updates You ever find that often times the products are already bought before your input is requested? The better question is when do they ever check with you before they buy a product? Nope... They usually ask someone that has no clue of the impact to the production systems

RE: [ActiveDir] Results of survey - Most common cause of Active Directory failures?

2005-10-10 Thread Gil Kirkpatrick
Interesting idea... what say you joe? From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil RenoufSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:14 PMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Results of survey - Most common cause of Active Directory "failures"? Start a

RE: [ActiveDir] Results of survey - Most common cause of Active Directory failures?

2005-10-10 Thread joe
I don't have a problem with it. Take a peek at it first before you for sure tell me you want me to put it up there. I have stuff up there that can incite people and you would sort of become associated with it. We can do the same thing where we have it sent to you directly again. From:

[ActiveDir] ADFIND mods

2005-10-10 Thread joe
Not trying to scare anyone but I actually might have somehow hacked CSV support into the V1.* version of adfind. Jerry[1] pulled me off to the side at the MVP summit during the Exec sessions and threatened to thrash me if I didn't add the ability to support sorting the attribute output order for

<    1   2