Title: Schema Updates
I understand your point of view completely, I have the same
hang up about anything made by CA. (Not on my network.)
Unity really depends on your use. The things that Cisco has
changed make it awesome to use if you have an AD environment and a Cisco VOIP
system.Pricey to
A lot of things sucked with NT 3.50.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darren Mar-Elia
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 9:51 PM
To:
Agreed - the legacy APIs pose a serious problem in many cases.
After noodling over the LDAP issue a little more, and recalling that
ports are specified in the SRV records :), any AD aware of SRV aware
system/application should be able to handle multiple instances of LDAP
on a single server
Is this address on a contact that has [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a reply
address?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVPFreelance E-Mail
PhilosopherProtecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
Backups!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Monday, October 10, 2005
Title: Schema Updates
It's a feature with lots of "gee whiz!" appeal, but once
people see the price tag, the response is usually "ouch!"
We are still waiting for the "year of UM". I'm betting on
2007. :-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
They're inherently the same ... undoable disks ...
they're just easier to work with (as is the whole product in my entirely VMware
biased opinion).
--Dean WellsMSEtechnology* Email: dwells@msetechnology.comhttp://msetechnology.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
ok, it goes like this-
i work for a finanical corp so we have to stay in compliance.
i have 2 smtp connectors- one goes to a compliance server, the other to an journal host.
for the journal host, all my mail stores point to an external contact(1 smtp proxy addy) for journaling.
this gets routed
Again, I am speaking legacy baggage. If you were a UNIX developer, would you
rather stick to writing to old proprietary interfaces or using standards
based interfaces like LDAP and Kerberos, etc. Again, all of the integration
going on now is working in those areas. Those areas will move fine into
:o)
Don't even need to worry about multiple ports. It is all hierarchical. I
can, for instance run 50 NCs on a single ADAM instance on a single server. I
could also run 50 different instances of ADAM on 50 different ports. Which
makes more sense? But otherwise yes, the SRV records coupled with
Title: Schema Updates
Our movement for Cisco Unity was based
strictly on a wholesale move to Cisco VoIP solutions all the way around.
Apparently theres some cost savings there somewhere. I dunno
regarding the comment joe made about not ever being in your ad
environment. Concur 100%. You
Start a blog? :)
Since that takes some time to get traffic, perhaps joe would be willing to post your survey on his blog? I imagine hegets some good traffic to his blog.
Phil
On 10/10/05, Gil Kirkpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We usually do a big State of the AD World survey at DEC, and
What are the entries under E-Mail Addresses for the
contact? Which SMTP address is bolded?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVPFreelance E-Mail
PhilosopherProtecting the world from PSTs and Bricked
Backups!
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Monday,
Title: RE: [MVP-Directory Services] October MVP Awards
Congratulations to our new and re-awarded Directory
Services MVPs!
-Sean
And
congratulations to Marc Scheuner - re-awarded MVP for October!
_
From: Gary Wilson
Sent: Monday,
Title: Schema Updates
You
ever find that often times the products are already bought before your input is
requested?
The better question is when do they
ever check with you before they buy a product? Nope... They usually
ask someone that has no clue of the impact to the production systems
Interesting idea... what say you
joe?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phil
RenoufSent: Monday, October 10, 2005 7:14 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Results of
survey - Most common cause of Active Directory "failures"?
Start a
I don't have a problem with it. Take a peek at it first
before you for sure tell me you want me to put it up there. I have stuff up
there that can incite people and you would sort of become associated with it. We
can do the same thing where we have it sent to you directly
again.
From:
Not trying to scare anyone but I actually might have somehow hacked CSV
support into the V1.* version of adfind.
Jerry[1] pulled me off to the side at the MVP summit during the Exec
sessions and threatened to thrash me if I didn't add the ability to support
sorting the attribute output order for
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo