Title: Message
And now I can honestly say that I can
follow this thread and not be “completely” lost…thanks chapter
3 of “the book in the signature” for a great schema refresh! ;-)
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2006
Dear All,
As i am still new to the exchange & Active Directly .
Now, i have here in My Enviroment one exchange server & One Main Domain
Controller & One Backup Domain Controller .
All the servers are Windows server 2003 Enterprise Edition.
Now, i want to know, how the exchange server knows
Title: MS Exchange
Hi All,
Does anyone have any good tips or links that talk about updating mail box information in exchange 5.5 with LDAP?
Thanks
Atila Firmino
Dear All,
I have been asked to delegate some permissions on user objects so that the
users can update certain fields that are not self writable by default.
Initially I thought just find the required attributes and add authenticated
users read and write, but thinking about it I think this would
Can you use the builtin security principle called SELF?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Parris
Sent: 09 Feb 2006 11:53
To: ActiveDir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Delegation of permissions
Dear All,
I have been asked to delegate some
I was thinking of that but wanted clarification that is was correct and it did
not do something stupid or this principle translated to me during delegation.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: "Wyatt, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:24:21
To:
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Delega
Dean Wells wrote:
I really don't agree in the confined scenario Ulf described. Can you
explain your point further or is it merely an issue of Microsoft supporting
it?
OK, You've got me - when I think about it, it should not cause any
trouble. Ulf procedure is not a attempt to do authoritative
What? Other than upgrade to 2003?
It can be done, but there are some code pieces that won't be the same in 5.5 as they are in 2003 FWIW.
What exactly do you want to modify via LDAP? Is this something you want to write in house or use a third party tool to do?
One gotcha (you can find infor
You have mailboxes located on the domain controller?
Your question is not really an Exchange question, but a SMTP routing question. Could be related in some distant way to DNS.
Can you clarify what you are trying to do and what causes you to ask the question? That may help us understand what
Thanks.
I need to update informations like phone number for
examples. For many reasons we can´t migrate to exchange W2K for now... So I
will build a _vbscript_ to do this. What do you think?
Atila Firmino
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Al
MulnickSent: qu
Hi all.
We are finally getting our DR project going, and I'm looking for good
resources for design/implementation.
We have a small business; under 100 users. Running W2K3 AD (2 DCs in one
location), E2K3, Cisco Unity VM, home-grown intranet on IIS, LOB app
contained in-house. Around 30 remote SOH
Marwa,
Check this site out:
http://www.msexchange.org/tutorials/Using_SMTP_Connector_Internally.html
It talks about routing and SMTP
connectors.
May it's what you're looking
for.
I don't understand the question well but let me say
that since you have a DC, BDC, and Exchange, I am as
Your question is not very clear to me either, but I'll take a stab at
it:
1- Mailboxes are NOT physically located on DC, but on Exchange server's
Information Store.
2- Email is only an attribute of the user's AD account, not a separate
entity.
3- When Exchange is set up initially, the domains it i
I have two global groups which I need to merge the users in both into one new group. What is the best way to do this, I have used DSGET & DSMOD but it complains about existing users any ideas?
Yahoo! Mail - Helps protect you from nasty viruses.
http://blogs.msdn.com/brettsh/archive/2006/02/09/528708.aspx
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition - http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
joe wrote:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brettsh/archive/2006/02/09/528708.aspx
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
--
Letting your vendors set your risk analysis these days?
http://www.threatcode.com
List info : http://www.activedir.org/
Are we truly sure it's him though? Not a rogue developer who hacked
into his blog and posted?
It could be a compromised blog.
Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP] wrote:
joe wrote:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brettsh/archive/2006/02/09/528708.aspx
--
O'Reilly Active Directory Thi
On 2/9/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we truly sure it's him though? Not a rogue developer who hacked
> into his blog and posted?
>
> It could be a compromised blog.
>
I checked the date. It didn't say April 1st.
--
AdamT
'Thank-you for not re
It could confirm things ;)
Martin
- Original Message -
From: "AdamT" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 9:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Who would have thunk it
On 2/9/06, Susan Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are we tr
Guido and I did a DR webinar a few months back, and an associated
whitepaper... You can get the whitepaper at
http://www.netpro.com/welcome/disasterrecovery/index.cfm. The last I
looked, you had to register for it (email address, etc.)
We recorded the webinar as well. You can get to it at
http://w
I want to thank everybody who contributed to this thread.
The problem has been solved :-)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of TIROA
YANNSent: woensdag 8 februari 2006 17:58To:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM -
"All Address Lis
complains? Can you give more detail?
On 2/9/06, Frank Abagnale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two global groups which I need to merge the users in both into one new group. What is the best way to do this, I have used DSGET & DSMOD but it complains about existing users
any ideas?
Yahoo! Mai
I think that may be more work than is needed if it's an infrequent update cycle. CSV does this just fine via the admin utility.
_vbscript_ will work for that however. Like I said, permissions and syntax are sometimes different but it can be done. There's a utility that may be of interest to y
I have two existing groups: 1. USAT_HR_RO (24 members) 2. USNY_HR_RO (45 members) I created a new group to merge members of both groups above into the new group. 3. USHR_PROJSAP_RO (0 members) Some users are members of groups 1 & 2. I want to copy the users from groups 1 & 2 in
Let’s
here what you did.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Victor W.
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006 1:49 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Exchange - ESM - "All Address Lists"
and "All Global Address Lists" disappeared
Did you add –c to the second command
(“continue” despite errors)?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Abagnale
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
9:05 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Merging
Multiple AD Groups
Can you give us an example of the error you're getting?
Al
On 2/9/06, Frank Abagnale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have two existing groups:
1. USAT_HR_RO (24 members)
2. USNY_HR_RO (45 members)
I created a new group to merge members of both groups above into the new group.
3. USHR_PROJSA
dsmod failed:CN=USHR_PROJSAP_RO,ou=GGroups,dc=Intara,dc=com:The specified account name is already a member of the local group Dan - I have also tried the -c switch to no avail. thanksAl Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Can you give us an example of the error you're getting? Al O
I had a similar problem. It was solved by
this syntax:
dsget group "" -members | dsmod group "" –addmbr
This way you are only going to add members
that are not already there.
Hth,
Mike Thommes
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
OK - what I ment is
1. If extending well known schemas on a fresh installed domain, I'd do it
just like that b/c I don't care if I have issues (actually a failure would
allow me to have another Latte Macchiate while the DC freshly installs)
2. If extending with a 3rd Party Schema Extensions (usua
Yes - exactly - rolling back a single DC which was the only one with the
"new bad" schema doesn't hurt, but it' also able to forcefully demote,
metadata cleanup, dcpromo again, or reinstall fully with metadata-cleanup in
between, or just flush it and seize the schema master. Result will always be
a
Hmm.. the -c should have worked. Wonder why it didn't in your case? Can you post that syntax that you used?
On 2/9/06, Frank Abagnale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
dsmod failed:CN=USHR_PROJSAP_RO,ou=GGroups,dc=Intara,dc=com:The specified account name is already a member of the local group
Dan -
dsget group "CN=USNY_HR_RO,OU=GGroups,dc=Intara,dc=com" -members | dsmod group "CN=USHR_PROJSAP_RO,ou=GGroups,dc=Intara,dc=com" -addmbr -c The fact that some users are in both Group 1 & 2 wouldn't cause a problem would it? cheers AlAl Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Hmm.. the -c shoul
Hi Frank,
Ignore my previous post; no enough
sleep I guess. I posted a solution to this newsgroup on 7/3/2005. Check the archives.
Mike Thommes
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Abagnale
Sent: Thursday, February 09
Ulf B. Simon-Weidner wrote:
(...)
Note that no matter what - I'm usually always testing 3rd-Party Schema
Extensions first, meaning to verify OID, prefix, LinkIDs, document MapiIDs
and consult the customer in the risk of those, and verify the Structure
(classes, how they are added to existing ob
There are still situations in Windows 2003
where a single bridgehead can be configured even when there are multiple
available. Let me know if you’re curious.
Wook
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bernard, Aric
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006
http://www.gilsblog.com/index.cfm?commentID=60
Well,
it made me laugh.
Tony
This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part
Wook, I’d be interested in hearing
those situations. J
:m:dsm:cci:mvp
marcusoh.blogspot.com
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Lee, Wook
Sent: Thursday, February 09, 2006
5:18 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Site Link
38 matches
Mail list logo
