uses.
So do we have a timeline on these blog entries? eg
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Mylo, from the way you speak of JET, I suspect you might not know of the
two JETs, and be thinking that JET = Access ... make sure you're
edJETicated (man, I slay me! ;), see Notes at bottom of this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en
Your blog link being what? :)
:m:dsm:cci:mvp marcusoh.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
y, October 09, 2005
11:31 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
"what would you think would be a good
replacement for dns/wins?"
There currently isn't one. Not really even a
viable option on the table. joe doesn'
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I would guess that it never got that far. My experience with folks
troubleshooting WINS is that they don't look very deep, someone
, 2005 1:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Yes, I was hoping you wouldn't take it has who has a bigger database
contest, that was not my intent. Besides it was really who has seen the
bigger database, and who wants to admit that, you want
: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Your blog link being what? :)
:m:dsm:cci:mvp marcusoh.blogspot.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 1:32 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE
:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Susan
Bradley, CPA aka Ebitz - SBS Rocks [MVP]
*Sent:* Monday, October 10, 2005 12:33 AM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
cough
I love DNS and AD and argue strongly for the glue all
: Monday, October 10, 2005 3:05 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
:-P
I think someone needs to run SBS at home. See what nice solid DNS/AD is all
about :-)
lurk mode back on
joe wrote:
Heck NetBEUI with all broadcasts would work perfect
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
In the NT 3.50 days, WINS was a mess. I'm sorry but no amount of good design
would help it. It just sucked. It got progressively better in NT 4.0 but I
saw lots of corruptions of many kinds in 3.5x and I knew a thing
.
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Tom Kern
*Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:42 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
ok, i'll bite.
GPO's, i understand but whats
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Interesting question - and as to the 'implode point' for ESE/Jet Blue,
Brettsh can answer that one. I'm pretty sure that we have a good idea on
where the point of diminishing returns is, but it likely FAR exceeds what
anyone might practically do
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 4:44 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom
fields to AD
I've had the reverse-
last place i worked at had corrupted WINS at least once every 2 months(this
could of been d
] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:19 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Interesting question - and as to the 'implode point' for ESE/Jet Blue,
Brettsh can answer that one. I'm pretty sure that we have a good idea
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 2:18 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom
fields to AD
I wasn't saying I like WINS better than DNS or vice
versa, just said I don't like DNS. I especially dislike the AD/DNS integration.
I don't
like
DNS.
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Tom Kern
*Sent:* Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:42 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
ok, i'll bite.
GPO's, i
-someone else
running DNS properlyand I run AD properly.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick
KingslanSent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 11:31 AMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom
fields to AD
"what would you think would be a
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:16 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
So for those organizations that have exchange deployed... how do you make
the argument to shove
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brett Shirley
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 11:29 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Mylo, from the way you speak of JET, I suspect you might not know of the two
JETs, and be thinking
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I used to work at a place where WINS and DNS were used. IMO, WINS was
faster in resolution and *just* worked but is not standard as DNS resolution
is. DNS integration with AD is a pain and can be a hassle when
troubleshooting, sometimes doing
] On Behalf Of
joeSent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:52 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom
fields to AD
I don't think the rest of the planet loves DNS, I think a
lot of people put up with it as a necessary evil due to exactly the reason you
state. There isn't
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
"what would you think would be a
good replacement for dns/wins?"
There currently isn't one. Not really even
a viable option on the table. joe doesn't like DNS. The rest of the
planet loves DNS- incl
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I would guess that it never got that far. My experience with folks
troubleshooting WINS is that they don't look very deep, someone can't
.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I would guess that it never got that far. My experience with folks
WINS.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Sunday, October 09, 2005 8:52 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I would guess that it never got that far. My experience
: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Mylo, from the way you speak of JET, I suspect you might not know of the two
JETs, and be thinking that JET = Access ... make sure you're edJETicated
(man, I slay me! ;), see Notes at bottom of this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library
because
it's very bad. We will use ADAM. Get used to it.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mylo
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 8:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
That's a good
] On Behalf Of Rick Kingslan
Sent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 10:19 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Interesting question - and as to the 'implode point' for ESE/Jet Blue,
Brettsh can answer that one. I'm pretty sure that we have a good idea
/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/ese/ese/jet
createdatabase.asp?frame=true
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mylo
Sent: Friday, October 07, 2005 9:04 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
:16 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would like to add some custom fields, about 30, to AD. He would
like to add bio
: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
] On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 11:19 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Interesting question - and as to the 'implode point' for ESE/Jet Blue,Brettsh can answer that one.I'm
PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would like to add some custom fields, about 30, to AD. He would
like to add bio
any name resolution systems better than DNS, it was simply I don't
like DNS.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
KernSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:42 PMTo:
ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom
fields to AD
ok, i'll bite
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I wasn't saying I like WINS better than DNS or vice versa, just said I
don't
like DNS. I especially dislike the AD/DNS integration. I don't like
chicken
and egg problems.
BTW, as you bring up WINS. 1. I've never had a corrupted WINS Database. 2
.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tom KernSent: Saturday, October 08, 2005 12:42 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject:
Re: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
ok, i'll bite.
GPO's, i understand but whats there to hate about DNS?
its better than WINS.
I've
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would like to add some custom fields, about 30, to AD. He would like to
add bio information
, 2005 1:55 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I'm sure that if we tried, the TerraServer could be
served by a few optimized ADAM servers, don't you think?
I realize this is tongue in cheek but no I don't think it would be good.
I
am
10, 2005 7:34 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Can you outline how ADAM could be made transparent to an application?
I've been considering this myself but haven't delved far enough into the
subject yet...
:m:dsm:cci:mvp
-Original Message
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would like to add some custom fields, about 30, to AD. He would like
to add bio information into AD to be pulled by Sharepoint and other
applications for people to read.
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Steve Shaff
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 11:16 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would
, August 09, 2005 10:41 AM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Certainly it is possible. And, it's not overly difficult to DO, but the
upfront planning that SHOULD be done can be tedious.
Remember - this is the schema.
My opinion - and it seems
: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 12:34 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
...or ADAM. These kinds of requests have a tendency to creep beyond the
original scope, which can have unintended consequences if the upfront
planning falls short.
Hunter
@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
Group,
My manager wanted me to check, even though, I don't think that it is
possible, but, I will present the question.
He would like to add some custom fields, about 30, to AD. He would like to
add bio information into AD
be served by a few
optimized ADAM servers, don't you think?
;op
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, August 09, 2005 4:58 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
I am
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Adding custom fields to AD
joe,
You hit the nail on the head with what my problem is with this whole thread
- we're dumping crap into AD that really doesn't belong there.
Seriously, the data needs to be available to a SharePoint server and some
other apps, unless I read
45 matches
Mail list logo
