RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-18 Thread Roger Seielstad
Roger -- Roger D. Seielstad - MTS MCSE MS-MVP Sr. Systems Administrator Inovis Inc. -Original Message-From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 8:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch You know it may be bad to post a bun

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-17 Thread joe
oeware.net   (download joeware) http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet  (wear joeware)       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Roger SeielstadSent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:41 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch At least t

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-17 Thread Roger Seielstad
H/CIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 9:39 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch You mean like MIIS...   Marchitecture.  Strikes again.   Todd   From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-17 Thread Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
Title: Message You mean like MIIS…   Marchitecture…..  Strikes again.   Todd   From: Rick Kingslan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   Ahhh geez.  Deal with it, Smart Ass

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread joe
ear joeware)       From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 12:03 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Ahhh geez.  Deal with it, Smart Ass.  They like me here (I think).  I'm not so sure on

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
oeSent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:52 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Man I ignored that on the other list so you brought it here too     ARRG.   - http://www.joeware.net   (download joeware) http://www.cafeshops.com/joewarenet  (wear joewar

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
; Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Does that mean it's going to be hot stuff? ;-) Sorry... been a long day... ** Charlie Kaiser MCSE, CCNA Systems Engineer Essex Credit / Brickwalk 510 595 5083 ** However, there is destined to be, as I

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread joe
KingslanSent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:06 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Firstly, it won't be called SUS 2.0.  It will apparently be called the very unfortunate name of WUS - Windows Update Services.  Yes,  jokes have started, and WUS is getting trippe

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Charlie Kaiser
Does that mean it's going to be hot stuff? ;-) Sorry... been a long day... ** Charlie Kaiser MCSE, CCNA Systems Engineer Essex Credit / Brickwalk 510 595 5083 ** However, there is destined to be, as I understand it, an Application Programming Interface fo

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Michael B. Smith
Title: Message *cough* *splutter* HAHAHAHAHA. -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:06 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Firstly, it won't be c

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Rick Kingslan
ubject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch More public info will be forthcoming after this week's Microsoft Management Summit. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios TorontoSent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:31 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread joe
ROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios TorontoSent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 10:31 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch On another note what is a MS-MVP     Lynden From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto
Title: Message On another note what is a MS-MVP     Lynden From: Rod Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   More public info will be forthcoming after this week&#

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
2 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch > > > Well, SUS is also missing reporting and auditing, if I remember > correctly... I can't wait to see the new version though (anyone know > the beta guest id?) > > Several dep

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
al Message-From: Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 9:31 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Where can I find out more information on SUS version 2     Lynden

Re: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Robbie Foust
Daniel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *Sent:* Monday, March 15, 2004 4:43 PM *To:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *Subject:* [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches. We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alrigh

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Rod Trent
RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch Where can I find out more information on SUS version 2     Lynden From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:02 AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   I'm running SUS 1.1 qu

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Philadelphia, Lynden - Revios Toronto
Title: Message Where can I find out more information on SUS version 2     Lynden From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:02 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   I'm runnin

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-16 Thread Roger Seielstad
ED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches.  We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alright.  My question is are there superior products out there that someone has used and can recommend that

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-15 Thread Eric Fleischman
: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:47 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch   Yes, we're using Patchlink www.patchlink.com and it's working quite well.   From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cariglia, Daniel Sent: Monday, Ma

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-15 Thread Fuller, Stuart
eDir] Microsoft Patch I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches.  We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alright.  My question is are there superior products out there that someone has used and can recommend that work well with AD?  Running AD

RE: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-15 Thread Rimmerman, Russ
Yes, we're using Patchlink www.patchlink.com and it's working quite well. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Cariglia, DanielSent: Monday, March 15, 2004 3:43 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch I am in the process of

[ActiveDir] Microsoft Patch

2004-03-15 Thread Cariglia, Daniel
I am in the process of looking at alternatives to distribute/manage Microsoft patches.  We have SUS running in a lab setup and it seems alright.  My question is are there superior products out there that someone has used and can recommend that work well with AD?  Running AD with an empty ro