I have a devloper who is running visual source safe and has had issues since day one
logging in(to VSS).
The app just uses its own internal db of users for auth, not AD. However the files
reside on an ntfs share.
Here's my confusion- I put this devloper into the domainadmins group as a test. he
y 04, 2004 3:44 PM
To: ActiveDir (E-mail)
Subject: [ActiveDir] OT: riddle me this
I have a devloper who is running visual source safe and has had issues
since day one logging in(to VSS).
The app just uses its own internal db of users for auth, not AD. However
the files reside on an ntfs share.
Here
] OT: riddle me this
I have a devloper who is running visual source safe and has had issues since
day one logging in(to VSS).
The app just uses its own internal db of users for auth, not AD. However the
files reside on an ntfs share.
Here's my confusion- I put this devloper into the domaina
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: riddle me this
Sounds like you've got NTFS permissions covered, but have you checked
the share permissions?
Joe Pochedley
Weiler's Law - Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn't have to do
it himself.
-Original Me
: 05 May 2004 15:35
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: riddle me this
it was share permissions.
he had full control on the ntfs level, but only read on the share. my
question is- i thought ntfs permissions beat out share permissions when
there is a conflict?
-Original Message
Wednesday, May 05, 2004 10:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: riddle me this
>
> it was share permissions.
> he had full control on the ntfs level, but only read on the share.
> my question is- i thought ntfs permissions beat out share
> permis
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 7:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] OT: riddle me this
it was share permissions.
he had full control on the ntfs level, but only read on the share.
my question is- i thought ntfs permissions beat out share permissions
when there is a con
