ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Oh ya, duh. Good point.
Do you think that one is better than the other? I agree they are both
bad options. The app runs on IIS so using integrated auth would be
s easy; however, it requir
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:46 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
>
> Not having to do an LDAP query prior to connecting to the user. So
> they
> will not have to store a look
Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Oh ya,
reasons.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
You don't have to do an LDAP query first You can bind in LDAP with
domain
ion -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Not having to do an LDAP q
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:16 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
What simplicity will this offer?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
> -Ori
l.activedir.org
> Subject: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
>
> I have a customer who wants to write their authentication DLL using
the
> WinNT ADSI provider instead of LDAP provider for simplicity. Does
> anyone know if there will be any supportability issues with this
option
> goi
I have a customer who wants to write their authentication DLL using the
WinNT ADSI provider instead of LDAP provider for simplicity. Does
anyone know if there will be any supportability issues with this option
going forward? Is Longhorn going to support it?
BTW, the app is written in vb6 so Syst
