RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:15 AM To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS Those that spring to mind: W2k3 offers scavenging - QIP does not [but

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

#x27;t stuck in the developer mentality. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ruston, Neil Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 6:15 AM To: 'ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS Tho

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

issue. This is a Microsoft AD Domain issue.     joe     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 8:02 AMTo: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.orgSubject: Re: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS AD DNS is built-in /

Re: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

AD DNS is built-in / Active Directory integrated and Lucent is an external system -   Use AD's DNS if possible; also if you lose communications with your Lucent QIP systems, people could have severe login problems...   Chuck Gafford Unisys Architect 2  

RE: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

April 2005 11:02 To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: [ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS Hi all I was wondering if what (if any) benefits/advantages are over using Microsoft (2003) DNS Vs. QIP in Active Directory? Any comments or thoughts welcome :) James

[ActiveDir] Windows Server 2003 DNS Vs. LUCENT QIP DNS

Hi all I was wondering if what (if any) benefits/advantages are over using Microsoft (2003) DNS Vs. QIP in Active Directory? Any comments or thoughts welcome :) James _ Want to block unwanted pop-ups? Download the free MSN Toolbar no