RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-12 Thread deji
] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :) OK, now that we've got that out of the way, here's

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
Debbie, True for Windows 2000 as well. Let me see if I can find the doc for you. Its not an issue its the recommended practice. Are you thinking of the potential forest island problem where a child domain can become orphaned from the forest records if it doesnt secondary the

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread deji
RTK, aka Rick T(for Trouble) Kingslan, sat down in his high chair and bellowed as follows: True for Windows 2000 as well To which I trembled and exclaimed: Don't you mean: True for Windows 2000, but not for Windows 2003? My cheat sheets say that's what you meant. Maybe they need updating.

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
-rtk -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 12:43 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS RTK, aka Rick T(for Trouble) Kingslan, sat down

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS RTK, aka Rick T(for Trouble) Kingslan, sat down in his high chair and bellowed as follows: True for Windows 2000 as well To which I trembled and exclaimed: Don't you mean: True for Windows 2000, but not for Windows 2003? My cheat sheets say that's what you

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread deji
that Today is the Tomorrow you were worried about Yesterday? -anon From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Kingslan, Rick T. Sent: Wed 5/11/2005 1:26 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS More appropriately, please interpret because I've

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Kingslan, Rick T.
PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :) OK, now that we've got that out

Re: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Santhosh Sivarajan
- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :) OK, now that we've got that out of the way, here's what I

RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS

2005-05-11 Thread Rick Kingslan
] [mailto:ActiveDir- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 3:50 PM To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] 2003 DNS I see that the absence of that critical smiley tripped you. Here :) :) OK, now that we've got that out of the way, here's what