How are you determining the clients are utilizing the PDCE for these
activities? A network trace from the client may prove useful.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2006 1:51 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: [
Hi Kamlesh,
I'm not necessarily recommending this as a fix, but wondering if
you've seen it yet and if would apply?
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/831201/en-us
-DaveC
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar
on PDCe I am looking at sessions and open files in fsmgmt.msc, which
lists down the client machines with IP, then I am verifying the site
of each connecting IP using ATSN.exe from joeware.
Also, our network team had complained that network link is getting
choked, and as a proof gave list of sourc
I checked the file version of dfssvc.exe and dfs.sys on my site DCs, they
are higher than the one mentioned in the KB article. So point in looking at
that fix.
--
Kamlesh
On 12/1/06, David Cliffe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Kamlesh,
I'm not necessarily recommending this as a fix, but
Appreciate the efforts taken.
AFAIK, this would be more of a DFS issue then authentication, as clients are
pulling policies and files from PDCe.
When I look into details of DFS link targets for sysvol or netlogon, PDCe is
listed as distance 9th in the list of servers which clients should contact
__
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 12:29 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Bulk of client going to PDC
I checked the file versi
How are your clients connected? Site definitions?
On 12/1/06, Kamlesh Parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Appreciate the efforts taken.
AFAIK, this would be more of a DFS issue then authentication, as clients
are pulling policies and files from PDCe.
When I look into details of DFS link targets
e to modify the registry on each applicable DC). I wonder if that would
help in your case?
-DaveC
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kamlesh Parmar
*Sent:* Friday, December 01, 2006 12:29 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Sub
Am sorry, I didn't follow what you are asking.. could you be more specific.
On 12/2/06, Al Mulnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
How are your clients connected? Site definitions?
On 12/1/06, Kamlesh Parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Appreciate the efforts taken.
>
> AFAIK, this would be more
Site definitions - are your site definitions up to date?
How are your clients connected - Are they ethernet, 802.11x, tokenring, ??
On 12/2/06, Kamlesh Parmar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am sorry, I didn't follow what you are asking.. could you be more
specific.
On 12/2/06, Al Mulnick <[EMA
Yes checked the correct subnets are attached to correct sites.
All clients are connected via Ethernet 100/Full Duplex.
Its like mass exodus of swarm of computers, going to PDCe, and in turn
choking the WAN links.
It happened like once a day.. and everyday it would be random site.
Have asked dif
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kamlesh Parmar
Sent: Saturday, December 02, 2006 1:55 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Bulk of client going to PDC
Yes checked the correct subnets are attached to correct sites.
All clients are connected via Ethernet 100/Full Duplex.
Its like
ctive Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
--
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Kamlesh Parmar
*Sent:* Saturday, December 02, 2006 1:55 PM
*To:* ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
*Subject:* Re: [ActiveDir] Bulk of
13 matches
Mail list logo
