I didn't know he liked pinball. :o)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Mezzone
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:41 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
Are you related to Paul
nd - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
"the support guys going to play pinball or something and that one
guy in the corner who doesn't talk to anyone goes and fixes the problem"
... that's you that is :)
--
Dean Wells
MSEtechnology
* Tel: +
MAIL PROTECTED]
http://msetechnology.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
LOL. This sentence "The support guys have been pl
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 3:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
LOL. This sentence "The support guys have been playing about all day and I
'think&#x
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 11:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
;o)
Our mail filtering product blew up and they had no resilience built in..
The
OTECTED] On Behalf Of Rutherford,
Robert
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
As always and pitched at the perfect level
Many hours/days of sweat and tears have been saved thanks to everyone's
input on here.
note.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean Wells
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:07 PM
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
Importance: High
For those of you that don't always read the more length
13, 2004 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
As always and pitched at the perfect level
Many hours/days of sweat and tears have been saved thanks to everyone's
input on here.
Hey, I love you guys :O)
'He Says', grinning i
Too much information, thanks
-Original Message-
From: Rutherford, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2004 6:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
As always and pitched at the perfect level
Many hours/days of
ide his monitor.
-Original Message-
From: Dean Wells [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 13 July 2004 02:07
To: Send - AD mailing list
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
Importance: High
For those of you that don't always read the more lengthy, complex
replies ... read this o
4 9:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
This issue with this is at that is opens more attack vectors on the DC.
Normally the only vectors you have are
1. Anyone with physical access
2. Any services that expose remotely exploitable holes.
With 1, you can
Behalf Of Thommes, Michael M.
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 9:35 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
Hi Joe,
A related question - we got to talking about what access is required to
run "srvinfo.exe" (from the resource kit) against a domain contro
es
-Original Message-
From: joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 8:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
This issue with this is at that is opens more attack vectors on the DC.
Normally the only vectors you have are
1. Anyo
This issue with this is at that is opens more attack vectors on the DC.
Normally the only vectors you have are
1. Anyone with physical access
2. Any services that expose remotely exploitable holes.
With 1, you can put compensating controls into place such as locking the DC
into a room or lockin
mmend a 3rd server dedicated to
that purpose. Because, as Robert says, you always need at least 2 DCs in your
environment.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Rutherford,
Robert
Sent: Monday, July 12, 2004 5:19 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subjec
bject: RE: [ActiveDir] Domain Controller Question
>
> Running TS on a Domain Controller is generally not a good
> idea, mainly down to security issues and possible performance
> degradation. It will run but I would not consider it myself,
> i.e. some app's need to run with elevated
Running TS on a Domain Controller is generally not a good idea, mainly
down to security issues and possible performance degradation. It will
run but I would not consider it myself, i.e. some app's need to run with
elevated privileges and I wouldn't want this on a DC. I'm sure someone
else will jump
17 matches
Mail list logo
