ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:11 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
>
>
> Theres a lot of room there for all of us.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
I've known Roger for a few years now, so the answer is : Both
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
Is that a stroke
Alrighty then
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:53 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
I've known Roger for a few years now, so the a
RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
Theres a lot of room there for all of us.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:33 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Mi
Theres a lot of room there for all of us.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 7:33 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
Bruce is just riding on my
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 4:41 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
>
>
> I agree with Martin Tuip.
>
> Regards,
> /Jimmy
> --
> Jimmy Andersson, Q Advice AB
> Microsoft MVP - A
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
I agree on that with you. Windows 2000 has been as stable as a rock. So
besides that and the retiring of the support it should be an easy one.
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
, January 15, 2003 8:21 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
To date, I haven't found an instance where NT4 was more stable than
Win2k.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - M
ung [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:50 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
>
>
> I don't know if this will be of any importance, but I have
> seen several
> instances whe
Sounds more like poor installations rather than a NT4 issue.
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 12:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
I don't know if this
Seielstad
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:10 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
Add to that the fact that Exchange 5.5 is end of support at the same
time, and its pretty much a no brainer.
-
Um - ditto :)
-Original Message-
From: Van Donk, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
Cliff,
I think that the link below says it all:
http://microsoft.com
age-
> From: Van Donk, Fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Justications to Migrate to Active Directory
>
>
> Cliff,
>
> I think that the link below says it all:
>
Cliff –
From a ROI and support point of view – I would be sure to mention
that after 12/31/03 MS will no longer provide support for NT4.0 and push them
along with the suggestion that it would be better to have 2K up and running
well for a while (in a mixed mode environment) before the c
Cliff,
I think that the link below says it all:
http://microsoft.com/ntserver/ProductInfo/Availability/Retiring.asp
No more support for NT4 after the end of this year.
-Original Message-
From: Clifford Airhart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 11:37 AM
To: [E
15 matches
Mail list logo
