Jim,
MMS (or Microsoft Metadirectory Services, for the un-initiated) used to
be (and, I guess until the release of 3.0) a free piece of software
from Microsoft. Getting it, though, was / is the tough part.
The only way to get the software was to contract Microsoft Consulting
Services or a Micro
rosoft.com/windows2000/technologies/directory/MMS/mms2003_faq.asp
requires Windows .NET Server and SQL2000 (and that 1Q03 has now slipped a little)
Lee Flight
Network Support, Computer Centre
University of Leicester
>
> From: "Rick Kingslan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: RE:
ED]] On Behalf Of Flight, L.
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 3:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS
>
>
> Hi,
>
> If you want to do inter-AD forest testing:
>
> "Microsoft Metadirectory Services 2003, Standard Edition, will shi
Title: Message
IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two. Granted
MMS is nice in what it does (been working with it on and off for a while) but
ADAM is really a special product in what you can do with it. For those of
you that want to integrate your application, but don't want to go to the
Title: Message
Another lower cost alternative that I've
found is Imanami's Directory Transformation Manager (http://www.imanami.com).
But, I've not have a chance to evaluate it yet. Is anyone here using DTM?
-Original Message-
From: Myrick, Todd (NIH/CIT)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROT
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:39
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003
IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two. Granted
MMS is nice in what it does (been working with it on and off for a while) but
ADAM is really a special pr
r the
apps dev guys :)
Glenn
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Kingslan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 11:38
PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
IMHO, ADAM is the more exciting of the two. Granted
MMS is nice in what it
if
it does, encourage the developers to use an infrastructure Single Sign On
product.
Just my humble opinion.
Todd
-Original Message-
From: Glenn Corbett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June
27, 2003 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003
and ADAM 2003
day, June 28, 2003 11:29
AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
I would encourage
organizations to consider a registry for Adam's or LDAP type
directories. You don't want to end up with the same mess NT 4 domains
created for applications. I would find
8, 2003 4:34
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003
Todd,
I agree.
My point was that our apps dev guys are looking
into integrating with AD for some of the corporate apps. ADAM lets us
deploy very quickly a "lookalike" of our AD infr
owsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn
CorbettSent: Friday, June 27, 2003 7:54 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
ADAM is also good for those applications that want
to start doing some AD integration function
ke extra work on top of everything
else.
joe
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn
CorbettSent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 4:34 AMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
developers and the
associated overheads (changes to the images for vmware support etc), the costs
become a bit prohibitive.
G.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick Kingslan
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 12:44
AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
E, MCSA, MCTMicrosoft MVP - Active
DirectoryAssociate ExpertExpert Zone -
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Glenn
CorbettSent: Saturday, June 28, 2003 10:41 PMTo:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM
Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
Yeah, I have to agree with you on the licensing costs on
user basis, but it sure beats the hell out of the fights over the test lab, or
the added costs that might be associated with hardware, etc. for test
ks
for the insights.
joe
--
Joe Richards
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn CorbettSent: Saturday, June 28, 2003
11:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003
J
understanding of the
best ways to use Active Directory. Enough of that though...
joe
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Glenn CorbettSent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:17
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[Active
:19 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
Glen
if you don't mind my asking, how large is your environment. I started to get
impressed by the 12 people comment and then realized I had nothing to go on in
terms of how many servers and people you were actually suppo
Title: Message
Joe,
comments inline
- Original Message -
From:
Joe
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2003 1:07 AM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
ADAM 2003
No
problem on the ramble.
-
*grin*
It
sounds like you have an
: Saturday, June 28, 2003 9:39
AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and ADAM 2003
Do
you have a method of searching for the AD/AMs or otherwise preventing
developers from spinning them up and using them without your knowledge in a
production way?
My
Title: Message
Good
reply...
Sounds
like you organization takes the directory very seriously.
Todd
-Original Message-From: Glenn Corbett
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2003
11:17 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[ActiveDir] MMS 2003 and
21 matches
Mail list logo
