The worst part of the mixed to native mode conversion is picking which
refreshing beverage you're going to enjoy when its done.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis Inc.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMA
Always a good Guinness!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native
The worst part of the mixed to native mode conversion is picking which
refreshin
> cc:
Sent by: Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed
to Native
gh.
Todd Myrick
-Original Message-
From: Sullivan, Kevin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native
Always a good Guinness!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native
Always a good Guinness!
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 7:06 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Ac
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think they called it leap frogging or something
like that :-)
> from:Missy Koslosky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> date:Tue, 01 Apr 2003 05:13:06
> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 200
d our old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think they called it leap froggi
e was
built before you were with your organization. This was the case with me
and our old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agr
s the case with me
and our old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think they call
-
From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:16 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
The only problem is that single instance storage benefits are lost. So
you
may experience a large increase in disk re
Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:16 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
>
>
> The only problem is that single instance storage benefits are
> lost. So you may experience a large increase in disk requirements.
>
>
Also Kenneth - when you use the Exchange Tasks\Move Mailbox feature -
-the SIS is preserved.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
Well we went about it like this (and
My apologies - I could have sworn I read otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
That's incorrect. Using t
13 matches
Mail list logo
