old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think they called it leap frogging
. This was the case with me
and our old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think
. This was the case with me
and our old box was a PIG.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 7:30 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
I agree. Option 1 worked for me. I think they called
-
From: Garello, Kenneth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:16 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
The only problem is that single instance storage benefits are lost. So
you
may experience a large increase in disk requirements
, 2003 9:16 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
The only problem is that single instance storage benefits are
lost. So you may experience a large increase in disk requirements.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino [mailto:[EMAIL
Also Kenneth - when you use the Exchange Tasks\Move Mailbox feature -
-the SIS is preserved.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Cerino
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
Well we went about it like
My apologies - I could have sworn I read otherwise.
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 10:08 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Mixed to Native and Exchange 2000
That's incorrect. Using the move mailbox
Todd,
FWIW, we did Option 1, or what is commonly referred to as the 'leap-frog'
method. For those who don't know, the leap-frog comes from the fact that
you put in a new, pristine server, move the mailboxes to the IS, then once
box A has had all mailbox data moved off of it and all clean-up has
I'd go with option 1 - the moving train (or whatever it's called these
days). Tony Redmond write an article about this a few years ago that should
be available in the archies of www.winnetmag.com somewhere.
I do a lot of migrations, and this is the method we choose most of the time.
Missy
