]
On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003
8:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Possibly OT - DFS vs 3rd party DR
Jeffrey,
I
personally am not a big fan of Dfs - mainly due to a very bad experience in
the early days of Windows 2000 (April 2000). It has gotten
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:28
AMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Cc: 'Rick
Kingslan'Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Possibly OT - DFS vs 3rd party
DR
Rick -
Thanks for the info. I've found
VSS to be quite useful in our lab, but don't think it will work well for
Disaster
, June 11, 2003
8:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Possibly OT - DFS vs 3rd party DR
Jeffrey,
I
personally am not a big fan of Dfs - mainly due to a very bad experience in
the early days of Windows 2000 (April 2000). It has gotten better, but
is not really a great
Title: Message
Jeffrey,
I
personally am not a big fan of Dfs - mainly due to a very bad experience in the
early days of Windows 2000 (April 2000). It has gotten better, but is not
really a great solution to bank your DR process on. IMHO, depending on
what your bandwidth is like, the move
... :oP
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003
8:09 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Possibly OT - DFS vs 3rd party DR
Jeffrey,
I
personally am not a big fan of Dfs
time.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Rick KingslanSent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003
11:27 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE:
[ActiveDir] Possibly OT - DFS vs 3rd party DR
Well, technically speaking - it's actually the FRS
