RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions

2003-10-10 Thread Fugleberg, David A
AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions The MS SFU 3.0 team also refused to provide LDIF files for their schema extensions. Microsoft really needs to set the example here. Most people are worried enough about extending the schema and when you

RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions

2003-10-10 Thread Creamer, Mark
, 2003 8:49 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions The MS SFU 3.0 team also refused to provide LDIF files for their schema extensions. Microsoft really needs to set the example here. Most people are worried enough about extending the schema

RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions

2003-10-09 Thread GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
Tony, I don't have an LDIF file, but here are some details on the schema extensions as reported from the SMS2003 'Extadsch.exe' utility: Defined attribute cn=MS-SMS-Site-Code. Defined attribute cn=mS-SMS-Assignment-Site-Code. Defined attribute cn=MS-SMS-Site-Boundaries. Defined attribute

RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions

2003-10-09 Thread Tony Murray
Thanks Guido. This is good info. I like the idea of having the LDIF files available for testing schema updates outside the application itself. As Robbie Allen has pointed out in various books, articles and forums, LDIF files provide a useful self-documenting method of keeping track of your

RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions

2003-10-09 Thread Robbie Allen
://www.rallenhome.com/ -Original Message- From: Tony Murray [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 7:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] SMS Server 2003: AD schema extensions Thanks Guido. This is good info. I like the idea of having the LDIF files