RE: [ActiveDir] Why Active Directory?

2002-07-11 Thread Darren Sykes
David, I'd certainly suggest upgrading the file servers and making them DC's. The cost should be far less than an additional 2 servers. Using a workgroup is a short term measure and any company growing at a reasonable rate (10 new users at once) surely would benefit from a bit of forward

RE: [ActiveDir] Why Active Directory?

2002-07-11 Thread Darren Sykes
Forgot to add - you don't need to upgrade all of the workstations to Windows 2000. They'll be OK running the current OS's - though not the easiest to manage with loads of OS specific problems likely to arise. What do you mean by disappearing off the network? Do you mean they cannot be contacted

RE: [ActiveDir] Why Active Directory?

2002-07-11 Thread David N. Precht
Sounds like a WINS issue. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darren Sykes Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 09:27 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] Why Active Directory? Forgot to add - you don't need to upgrade all

RE: [ActiveDir] Why Active Directory?

2002-07-11 Thread Bjelke John A Contr AFRL/VSIO
David, the way to best reduce total cost of ownership on any network (and the amount of work you have to put in on it) is to go to a standardized desktop environment where possible. The fewer hardware and software configurations an organization has, the easier, theoretically at least, it