ECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:40 PM
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Oh ya, duh. Good point.
Do you think that one is better than the other? I agree they are both
bad options. The app runs on IIS so using integrated auth would be
s easy; however, it requir
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:46 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
>
> Not having to do an LDAP query prior to connecting to the user. So
> they
> will not have to store a look
Directory Third Edition -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 7:40 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Oh ya,
reasons.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of joe
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:24 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
You don't have to do an LDAP query first You can bind in LDAP with
domain
ion -
http://www.joeware.net/win/ad3e.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 6:46 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
Not having to do an LDAP q
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian Desmond
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 2:16 PM
To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] WinNT ADSI provider
What simplicity will this offer?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
> -Ori
What simplicity will this offer?
Thanks,
Brian Desmond
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
c - 312.731.3132
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:ActiveDir-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Isenhour, Joseph
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 4:02 PM
> To: ActiveDir@mail.activedir.org
> Su
