RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore

2003-08-27 Thread GRILLENMEIER,GUIDO (HP-Germany,ex1)
: Graham Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Montag, 18. August 2003 17:24 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore Rick, please excuse the whinge borne out of a bit of frustration i am afraid !! am needing to write procedural documents for what i would regard

Re: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore

2003-08-18 Thread Graham Turner
! Thanks again GT - Original Message - From: Darren Mar-Elia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:30 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore Graham- You're absolutely rigth about the dependencies between the AD and SYSVOL portions of a GPO

RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore

2003-08-18 Thread Rick Kingslan
of delivering finished products ! Thanks again GT - Original Message - From: Darren Mar-Elia [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, August 17, 2003 9:30 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore Graham- You're absolutely rigth about the dependencies between the AD

Re: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore

2003-08-18 Thread Graham Turner
18, 2003 2:34 PM Subject: RE: [ActiveDir] authoritative GPO restore Graham, Though I don't totally disagree, I'm not sure what part of the picture is missing to cause you to make a statement such as: Microsoft seem incapable of delivering finished products ! The GPMC *does* make it much