Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread Guillaume Nodet
+1 Guillaume Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Guys, This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Please take the time to check it out and let us know if you find an issue that would hold up a RC1 release. This should address the last set of issues raised against the first set of binaries.

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread Dain Sundstrom
+1 -dain On Mar 23, 2006, at 6:46 PM, Adrian Co wrote: +1 Release the binary as our RC1 Regards, Adrian Co - Original Message - From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:54 AM Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate. Hi Guys, T

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread Rob Davies
+1 On 22 Mar 2006, at 18:54, Hiram Chirino wrote: Hi Guys, This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Please take the time to check it out and let us know if you find an issue that would hold up a RC1 release. This should address the last set of issues raised against the first se

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread Adrian Co
+1 Release the binary as our RC1 Regards, Adrian Co - Original Message - From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:54 AM Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate. Hi Guys, This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Plea

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread Jonas Lim
+1 Release the binary as our RC1 regards, Jonas - Original Message - From: "Hiram Chirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 2:54 AM Subject: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate. Hi Guys, This if the 2nd try at getting the RC1 binary released. Please ta

[discuss] Improvements in release info for next RC

2006-03-23 Thread John Sisson
Trying to put myself in the shoes of a user who is not heavily involved in the project.. IMHO, in RC2 we should aim to improve the information included with the release so users can quickly get up and running. Also we should try to provide similar information that other ASF projects provide i

Re: [VOTE] ActiveMQ RC1 2nd release candidate.

2006-03-23 Thread John Sisson
[X] +1 Release the binary as our RC1 John

Re: Getting Geronimo to use an upcoming ActiveMQ 4.x release and the activemq-gbean & activemq-gbean-management modules

2006-03-23 Thread Hiram Chirino
Hi John, On 3/23/06, John Sisson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cross posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so the Geronimo team is involved in > discussions regarding ActiveMQ integration, as I don't think the missing > gbean support in ActiveMQ 4.0 has been discussed on the Geronimo dev list. > > The missi

New AMQ C++ client update

2006-03-23 Thread Mats Forslöf
Hi, The new update should make the C++ client on par with the C# client. The client is now APR free which makes it totally independent of 3rd party libs and it compiles on both Windows and Linux (make files and updated groovy scripts included). Also, we have made a slight architectural re-desig

[jira] Created: (AMQ-656) Update of AMQ C++ client

2006-03-23 Thread MF (JIRA)
Update of AMQ C++ client Key: AMQ-656 URL: http://jira.activemq.org/jira//browse/AMQ-656 Project: ActiveMQ Type: Improvement Components: JMS client Reporter: MF Attachments: source_060323.zip Attached is a new update of the C++ cl

Re: Getting Geronimo to use an upcoming ActiveMQ 4.x release and the activemq-gbean & activemq-gbean-management modules

2006-03-23 Thread John Sisson
Cross posting to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so the Geronimo team is involved in discussions regarding ActiveMQ integration, as I don't think the missing gbean support in ActiveMQ 4.0 has been discussed on the Geronimo dev list. The missing gbean support was a surprise to me as I wasn't expecting Active