James Strachan wrote:
> Brian McCallister wrote:
> > The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1)
OK
> > we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
> > under a "committer votes all count" style
> FWIW we've had a PPMC in place for some time ;)
As James note
On Aug 16, 2006, at 12:32 AM, James Strachan wrote:
On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a "committer votes all count" style (really, e
On 8/16/06, Brian McCallister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a "committer votes all count" style (really, everyone's vote
counts, it is on a public list without
The ActiveMQ committers have decided to aim for TLP status (1), as
such we need to get a PPMC in place. Thus far we have been working
under a "committer votes all count" style (really, everyone's vote
counts, it is on a public list without any of the "mine is binding"
stuff that has become
