Re: security issue w/ UIXEditableValue ?

I totally agree, Matthias. But the question remains - how do you add a validation framework if not via adding a validator with the normal properties? And how will this framework be called in the case of a null value, if JSF doesn't let the validators (of this extended framework) run? regards,

Re: Re: security issue w/ UIXEditableValue ?

Martin, You don't want the validator to be on the component with the values - once you've said that it's cross-component validation, that's just not the right place. For one thing, you're relying on all sorts of ordering and lifecycle processing that is not likely to be true going forward (see

[plugins] release of m1

Hi guys, it looks like we are very very close for the plugins release. I think I will use that tool for it http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-release-plugin/introduction.html looks promissing. -Matthias -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog:

Re: move token map from UIXCollection to corresponding renderer

I made a few minor changes to this as reported on http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210 On 10/15/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've updated http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-210 with this discussion and a patch. let me know what you think. On 10/9/06,

[Proposal] update unsupported-agent tag for PDA

Hello, The unsupported-agent tag generated in faces-config.xml indicates which agents DON'T support the component.This information isn't used at runtime--rather, it's a hint to JDeveloper which components to show/hide in the component palette you can drag and drop from. For example,

Re: commandNavigationItem - recommend changing 2 properties

Hi, I have 3 thoughts about this. 1] I think navPane and breadcrumbs clearly only need 1 attribute. I actually thought they basically treat readOnly and disabled the same. 2] I can't think of a real world use case for using both attributes on train, if anyone on this list has a real world

Re: commandNavigationItem - recommend changing 2 properties

+1 to use just disabled and to drop readOnly On 10/16/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I have 3 thoughts about this. 1] I think navPane and breadcrumbs clearly only need 1 attribute. I actually thought they basically treat readOnly and disabled the same. 2] I can't think

Re: [vote] gabrielle crawford

Thanks for participance! So... 72 hours later we got 4 binding +1 2 non-binding +1 I already sent the invitation out to Gabrielle. -Matthias On 10/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 (binding). regards, Martin On 10/15/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1

Re: [Proposal] update unsupported-agent tag for PDA

Absolutely. (FWIW, something this obviously just a bug with only one possible resolution, I don't think we really need an e-mail thread - a JIRA issue will do fine.) -- Adam On 10/16/06, Piyush Hari [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, The unsupported-agent tag generated in faces-config.xml