Re: [PORTAL] Getting rid of filters

2006-11-03 Thread Adam Winer
On 11/3/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello everyone, I'm almost done implementing a custom wrapper for the life cycle which should allow us to replace a large part of the functionality of our filter (the other part being handled by FacesContext wrappers). I did have one question

Re: [PORTAL] Getting rid of filters

2006-11-03 Thread Scott O'Bryan
Oh yeah, and I'm moving wrapping of servlet objects out of the filters and into the ExternalContext. That does not mean we can't wrap them in filters as well, but everytime we do, those filters will not run in a portal. Scott Scott O'Bryan wrote: Two questions then: 1) Being that these

Re: Re: [PORTAL] Getting rid of filters

2006-11-03 Thread Adam Winer
On 11/3/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Two questions then: 1) Being that these won't work in a portal environment, should we move these to be executed elsewhere (like my custom lifecycle object) and change the API to be more container agnostic (ie. using the ExternalContext)?

Re: Re: [PORTAL] Getting rid of filters

2006-11-03 Thread Adam Winer
On 11/3/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Then I guess the final question is, is it important if these don't run in the portal. I mean if we can't change the API to be container agnostic and ordering is important, I'm forced to use the Lifecycle/ExternalContext approach for Portlets