]
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2006 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: Pending PDA Patches
On 9/21/06, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Joey,
I haven't had time to respond.
I don't know what the dependency method should be.
Your suggestion:
Is it acceptable
Hi Joey,
I haven't had time to respond.
I don't know what the dependency method should be.
Your suggestion:
Is it acceptable to locally apply the earlier patch that has not yet
been committed and, in effect, include that patch in a new patch?
I think this is acceptable, because I don't think
I have a question regarding pda code.
In Faces Major renderers, do we add pda hooks into the renderer, or
should we have separate pda renderers?
I was looking at the pda patch for autoSubmit, and I see this code in
FormRenderer. Do we have a rule as to when we
should use a pda renderer instead
Hello,
I'm resending this since there was no response to the first one...
I'd particularly appreciate a response to what the desired way to
handle patch dependencies is, when one patch is dependent on another
patch that has not yet been committed. (The review/committing of the
outstanding PDA
Hello,
The following two JIRAs have patches waiting to be reviewed/committed.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-167
Add 'autoSubmit' support for basic input components on PDAs
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-110
Add Agent for BlackBerry Browser 4.0
(this has a fix