Looks like all here have already agreed on that one.
What do you have in mind?
a *separate* project with trinidad-api/-impl as dependency,
where we can test components like the popup from danny?
Or a *branch* that really acts as a sandbox to play with ideas on components
and when stable (or
I personally like the latter.. Unfortunately very few things can be
developed in a Vacuume. At the very least it should have it's own copy
of impl.
Scott
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
Looks like all here have already agreed on that one.
What do you have in mind?
a *separate* project with
)
- the code won't bit-rot! Put it on a branch, and unless
someone is actively maintaining that branch, it'll
rapidly reach the point where it won't compile.
The way I see it, we'll want the same structure as trinidad:
trinidad-sandbox-build
trinidad-sandbox-api
trinidad-sandbox-impl
trinidad
+1 (non binding).
Q1 - Would this add more workload to those with Commit priviledge, or could
we open up the commit access a little more for this project?
On 12/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel directory
to trinidad
Yeah, I like this idea...
+1 (non-binding)
-Original Message-
From: Adam Winer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2006 11:44 AM
To: adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Trinidad sandbox?
I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad
Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first
and allow them to ferment a bit without effecting the main line. I like it!
+1 (non-binding)
Adam Winer wrote:
On 12/14/06, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (non binding).
Q1 - Would this add more workload to
Of course, this only covers high risk projects that are completely
seperable from the main line and don't require modifications
there.
-- Adam
On 12/14/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but high risk projects could be committed to the sandbox first
and allow them to ferment a
Yes, there is no way to restrict commit privileges within a project. Neither
technical, nor according to the Apache idea.
Sandbox is also the place where committers can apply patches much faster
with less care. So the committers workload should not be to much a problem
IMO.
BTW,
+1 for trinidad
+1 for this proposal
I already read here (or at myfaces list) that others are playing on
other ideas currently.
Nice to have Trinidad much more adopted ! :)
-M
On 12/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add a new sandbox project to trinidad, as a parallel directory
to
+1
On 12/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for this proposal
I already read here (or at myfaces list) that others are playing on
other ideas currently.
Nice to have Trinidad much more adopted ! :)
-M
On 12/14/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to add a
10 matches
Mail list logo
