Hi *,
we (Manfred and me, but get in contact with us if you are at J1, we'll
share the stage!) have been accepted for a MyFaces community BOF at
J1, and as the community is the most important asset in this project,
we'd like to talk about the community.
What I've thought about is to do a
Well, that's an exceptionally good title as well!
thanks Bruno.
regards,
Martin
On 4/27/07, Bruno Aranda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hehe The Faces of MyFaces, focusing the community, the pillar of the
project, is a good idea. No problems for me :-)
Cheers,
Bruno
On 27/04/07, Martin
Great Matthias! Keep up the good work...
regards,
Martin
On 4/22/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes,
all lists are moving.
My pref. would be
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
instead of using the standard myfaces lists;
-M
On 4/22/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Woo-hoo!
Do you use tomcat 5.5.x?
Did you get rid of jsp20.jar and commons-el.jar in your WEB-INF/lib directory?
regards,
Martin
On 4/19/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and the website from the Austrian company Irian (a JSF consulting
company) serves the current Trinidad demo as
As long as the community is somewhat similar (at least there are
people in both communities), I'm +1 for taking it in under MyFaces. My
only problem with the subproject approach is that when RCF comes out,
we'll have two sub projects where one sub project depends on the other
- kind of awkward.
in org.apache.myfaces.trinidadinternal.renderkit.html.layout
needs to be rewritten.
-- Adam
On 3/28/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi again,
I've looked at the combined code for CorePanelAccordion and
UIXShowDetail and their renderers and I wonder why the code for doing
the disclosure/closure is spreaded out
Hi *,
can anyone of the Trinidad core developers do me a favour and look at:
http://example.irian.at/trinidad-demo-20070328/faces/components/showOneAccordion.jspx
do you think the behaviour is what a user expects? I would not think
so... When I click on Panel 1 and then on Panel 2, I would
Hi *,
http://example.irian.at/trinidad-demo-20070328/faces/components/selectRangeChoiceBar.jspx
gives a nasty exception - any clue why this is so? Is this just a
problem of our deployment?
regards,
Martin
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses
the rendering of the component? That should be
possible with the event system, right?
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *,
can anyone of the Trinidad core developers do me a favour and look at:
http://example.irian.at/trinidad-demo-20070328/faces
Well, that I would have guessed as well ;)
I was just wondering if this happens maybe just on MyFaces and not on RI or so?
regards,
Martin
On 3/29/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the facet is causing the nice exception
On 3/29/07, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I still wonder if the approach MyFaces originally had wasn't better
than the new approach of the generator in Trinidad.
Apart from the fact of course that generation should happen on every
run of the build - we kind of neglected that.
What you have with the Trinidad generator now is:
Well, if the component is not passed in, you can't. The question is if
the method signature should be changed.
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, I should have been clearer. In the renderer code on the server-side
my component overrides the
I've been reiterating the necessity for this time and again ;) - I'd
be pretty much for an addition like this.
regards,
Martin
On 2/28/07, Danny Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was thinking that instead of displaying alert, the messages would appear
in the same place as they do in
I'd love to have it somewhere in Trinidad - but where to put it? A
section on the website for the download of the jar, and a certain
directory in the repository?
By the way: you should probably rename the image directory to
something not containing oracle/adf/...
regards,
Martin
On 2/8/07,
Sure, d'accord -
just like the Tomcat folks do it, it doesn't make sense to keep the product
versions fully at the spec or API versions. We should do the same for
MyFaces and Tomahawk, by the way.
regards,
Martin
On 2/4/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
resent, because went
+1
regards,
Martin
On 1/13/07, Simon Lessard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 1/12/07, Adam Winer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1.
-- Adam
On 1/12/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, sorry Grant. Forgot that PMCs from the sponsor (which is the
Apache MyFaces crowd)
AFAIK, it's not included in the source here.
Are you using facelets? Go with facelets templating, and you have much
the functionality of af:region out of the box.
regards,
Martin
On 12/1/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all,
I noticed in the Trinidad tag lib documentation that
Sure!
we might do the same sometime ;)
regards,
Martin
On 11/9/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yay.. Thanks Martin.
Martin Marinschek wrote:
There is nothing offending in copying any of the classes over from
MyFaces-Impl to Trinidad!
regards,
Martin
On 11/8/06, Scott
There is nothing offending in copying any of the classes over from
MyFaces-Impl to Trinidad!
regards,
Martin
On 11/8/06, Scott O'Bryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Guys,
All arguments about the need for a common code package aside (yes, I
will continue to champion this), Trinidad has the
Great idea!
regards,
Martin
On 10/25/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Matthias. Okay, this is issue 258
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ADFFACES-258
Thanks,
Gab
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
That would be a great improvement to all the inputDate / calendar
I believe that #1 is what we should do. If you do #2, then the locale
will be changed away from what the view-root offers (and which might
be derived from the accept-header of the request, so you have the
possibility to implement #2) somehow automagically - without the
developer really knowing.
*cross value* validations can be handy. sometimes yeah,
sometimes no. a framework (see sf.net) on top of faces is maybe fine for
that.
what's in swing for the case if field xyz is not submitted handle me
like... ?
or is it only in 296 ?
-M
On 10/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL
yeah,
sometimes no. a framework (see sf.net) on top of faces is maybe fine for that.
what's in swing for the case if field xyz is not submitted handle me like... ?
or is it only in 296 ?
-M
On 10/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi *;
I've added a comment to
http
+1 (binding).
regards,
Martin
On 10/15/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (binding)
Craig
On 10/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey *,
I'd like to start a vote for a new committer nominee
Gabrielle Crawford
Gabrielle Crawford has been very active on
+1 for applying this rule to all non-trivial commits.
regards,
Martin
On 10/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 (binding)
On 10/14/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi,
in myfaces we have the sorta rule to create a jira issue for almost
all commits. That
Most of these probably result from trying to make sure Trinidad works
well with the impl;)
regards,
Martin
On 10/10/06, Arash Rajaeeyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
although my vote is not counted but that's a good idea
just be aware that there are some incompatibilities between those versions.
Hi Scott,
we've had re-occuring discussions about a new commons-module. This
would probably be good candidate for this. Additionally, I've still
got to review a commit for a module by Shinsuke Sugaya, which is about
portlet compatibility - maybe it would be good to put it there.
regards,
Hi *,
I'm reviewing the tree2 currently, and I was wondering if we could
have a discussion about some of the concepts.
First thing I'd like to discuss is what happens with selected nodes.
Currently, selecting a node fires an action-listener. This is somewhat
ok, but I believe the
Yeah, as soon as Tomahawk 1.1.5 is done, there'll be quite some 1.2
work going on. I promise.
regards,
Martin
On 9/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am fine with that, also w/ using RI 1.2 instead of MyFaces.
On the 1.2 is not much work going on. I hope that changes soon
+1 for Gabrielle's latest suggestion. Then the only thing I need to
remember while writing the tag is that a messageDetail attribute
starts with me, rest will be done by code-complete.
regards,
Martin
On 9/27/06, Gabrielle Crawford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Winer wrote:
Well, as
Ho-Ho - I never used the VI - I thought that was Adam's way of coding?
regards,
Martin
On 9/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
same here
Gab's last sug.
On 9/27/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for Gabrielle's latest suggestion. Then the only thing I need
Hi there,
Ed Burns, Jesse Alexander and me will be heading a discussion on what
our users dreamed JSF 2.0 would be like - on friday, 2006/09/29, in
Munich, at the Oktoberfest.
So it's a good opportunity for both talking about JSF and drinking
beer - probably the best of the world. We'll meet up
+1
regards,
Martin
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1
On 8/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey *,
I'd like to start a vote for a new committer nominee
Simon Lessard
Simon Lessard has been very active on the adffaces-XXX lists. He
has
I totally agree with what Mike says here, and I do think that not only
Oracle will profit of once-monthly stable branches.
If there is something to say against a specific branch, we'll discuss
it on the list, and we'll certainly find a solution.
regards,
Martin
On 8/15/06, Adam Winer [EMAIL
for
JavaScript class names? For e.g. In our RichClient framework built on
top of
trinidad all our javascript classes are prefixed with ADF
Regards,
Venkata
On 7/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkata,
the general rule in MyFaces is to prefix
are some
of the important things that I have left regarding the charting:
- Animation support.
- Better Labeling support
- Tooltips
I will ask Matthias to put another version on the server as I am just about
ready to integrate.
Regards,
Venkata
On 7/16/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL
of
trinidad all our javascript classes are prefixed with ADF
Regards,
Venkata
On 7/17/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Venkata,
the general rule in MyFaces is to prefix with:
org_apache_myfaces_
regards,
Martin
On 7/17/06, venkata guddanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you call this ?
http://dojotoolkit.org/~dylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html
http://dojotoolkit.org/%7Edylan/dojo/tests/widget/demo_DatePicker.html
On 7/8/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't
Hi *,
can anybody tell me what the family of the ADF Faces form was before
the rename to
org.apache.myfaces.adf.Form
in a quest for compatibility, I'd like to add the old ADF Faces form
family to be checked for in the following code snippet.
regards,
Martin
public static FormInfo
May I ask about the underlying JavaScript? Do you use global method
names, or object oriented javascript? How about namespacing?
regards,
Martin
On 7/17/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/13/06, venkata guddanti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Matthias,
I would prefer to
yeah, dojo would be great - but dojo doesn't have a popup calendar so far!
regards,
Martin
On 7/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
cool to hear martin,
what's up, should we both take a look at dojo?
(the xml way)?
On 7/7/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One
One thing more - I don't like the javascript codebase of the current
tomahawk calendar, just to put this into the discussion.
So if someone comes up with a better solution (and the same or better
functionality) I'll happily put this component into tomahawk as well.
regards,
Martin
On 7/7/06,
You got a spam mail asking you to subscribe to the adf-faces list?
wow!
regards,
Martin
On 7/5/06, Rick Rodriguez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you could send me the link, or guide me to where i can find the link,
i would
greatly appreciate it.
I signed on to the email list from a spam mail i
+1 for the proposal in a whole
+1 for using inhibit - I like it more than reset or null
suggestion for ca new prefix-name: changing ora to oam (org apache myfaces)
regards,
Martin
On 6/24/06, Jeanne Waldman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I have another skinning proposal. This is a
robust
solution, and would be a great isolated task. I'd be more than
happy to point anyone tackling this in the right directions.
-- Adam
On 6/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi *,
Ernst Fastl - in his SoC beginning review - has worked
to the best approach for bringing Trinidad skinning framework into the
overall MyFaces world.
Regards,
Catalin
On 6/14/06, Martin Marinschek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Adam,
inspired means it will be based on the ADF Faces skinning framework.
We
evaluated Tobago's and Trinidad's thing
Hi *,
Ernst Fastl - in his SoC beginning review - has worked on comparing the
different PPR solutions so far. He's compared AjaxAnywhere, PPR in Trinidad,
and some of the Avatar approach.
What he's come up with so far is that he really likes the server-side
integration of Trinidad, especially
Gold wasn't intended to stand alone - instead to be used in conjunction with
MyFaces:
MyFaces Gold (like jakarta-commons)
regards,
Martin
On 6/8/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+1 for Trinidad.
-1 for Gold. The term Gold is often used as an abbreviation for Gold
Master,
meaning
We've had an additional name proposed while we were voting - should we still
take it in or not?
Zuku for some japanese name for steel and the german Zukunft=future
regards,
Martin
On 6/8/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
as pointed out in [1] there is still a name
I do believe as well that jMock doesn't provide enough context for
writing proper tests of JSF-behaviour.
At leasts whatever tests I have written so far needed some more than
just a method to call and the information on whether this method has
been called.
regards,
Martin
On 5/13/06, Adam
Done.
regards,
Martin
On 4/17/06, Mike Kienenberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just in case no one (who's around this week) is monitoring the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list, The ADF Faces section of the April board
report needs to be filled out. It's a wiki, so anyone should be able
to help out.
51 matches
Mail list logo
