Re: DRM prepare files

2000-08-18 Thread Henrik Hansson
Thanx for the clearification. got one more question however. I'm running ADSM Version 3, Release 1, Level 1.3 Is there any UNIX script that can be used to break up the planfiles? Henrik Hansson Nomafa AB Tel + 46 35 14 73 00 Fax + 46 35 14 73 99 Web; www.nomafa.com Mail; [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Restore with GUI - Rename of file

2000-08-18 Thread Karl Weigel
Gerd, after you have selected your file to restore, you will get the next window, where you can select to restore to same or different location, and some options to restore the directories path. Regards, Karl

Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset

2000-08-18 Thread John Naylor
Am I missing something obvious? I am doing some comparison testing of backupset restores against standard restores. I understood that in both cases restore would only be of active files and yet I see with a standard restore ANE4955I (Session: 5106, Node: PORSD1) Total number of objects

Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset

2000-08-18 Thread Barth, Terry V. (MBS)
It looks like the larger restore containes both active and inactive, try adding -active to your restore line. -Original Message- From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 6:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Discrepancy between standard restore and

Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset

2000-08-18 Thread John Naylor
Terry, -active is not a documented option with the netware client restore command -inactive is an option(which seems to confirm that active is the default) "Barth, Terry V. (MBS)" [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 08/18/2000 12:06:00 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset

2000-08-18 Thread Barth, Terry V. (MBS)
Sorry - didn't have my book with me - I recall always using inactive and pick for the novell restores - we only have 5 novell servers, so novell restores are not in a high demand for us. -Original Message- From: John Naylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 7:15

ms exchange updating winnt directory

2000-08-18 Thread Frost, Dave
Hi *SMers We were restoring an exchange server to a point-in-time - both the server itself and exchange. While we were restoring the server, we found that there were no "winnt" directories for the date we wanted. Investigating this, we have found that if the nt server is NOT running exchange,

Re: 3494 and RS6000 SP connection

2000-08-18 Thread Tom Melton
Eric, Did this require an additional serial port (card) to be added to the node, or was it connected to the 9 pin on the rear of the node? Thanks in advance for your assistance. -Tom [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/17/00 08:35PM Yes, previously I have 3494 connected to sliver node (tty port) via

Re: several storage pools in one library

2000-08-18 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
yes , i have created several differnt storage pool in the library platformwise , and migration destination is tapepool. but about shared i dont know, ask Dwight.

Windows Device Drivers and IBM manual

2000-08-18 Thread Richard Sims
Recently the topic came up about managing device drivers under Windows. An excellent reference that too many users don't know about is the "IBM SCSI Tape Drive, Medium Changer, and Library Device Drivers" reference. It addresses Magstar tape drives and libraries for a variety of platforms. The

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread Remeta, Mark
Hi Dave, are you saying that the WinNT directory was not restored? As far as using a special dirmc, the WinNT directory should still be there as long as it is still on the client. Mark -Original Message- From: Frost, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 8:11 AM

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread Frost, Dave
hi mark the defaults for the server are "keep 7 versions"; however, for exchange, we keep several weeks of logs. The requirement was to restore -14days. (a bit inconsistent, but all the other servers on the site use the same mc). We were able to restore a recent version of the server (say

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread Frost, Dave
hi mark surely if a _file_ was being updated within the directory, then the file would be backed up but not the directory name itself?? we intend investigating the dsmsched.log, when we can find the time! dave -- "on a clear disk, you can seek for ever." -- From: Remeta,

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread Remeta, Mark
I believe it backs up both the file and the directory. Mark -Original Message- From: Frost, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 10:29 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory hi mark surely if a _file_ was being updated

Re: ADSM-L Digest - 21 Jul 2000 to 22 Jul 2000 (#2000-200)

2000-08-18 Thread Ducati900
Anyone have any luck doing a bare metal restore of NT to different hardware. We have done the restore and it boots, but it is trying to load a SCSI driver that the physical device doesn't exist. I have tried reloading the driver so it couln't find it but we still hang during the boot process.

Veritas BackupExec interface to *SM

2000-08-18 Thread JerryLawson
Date: August 18, 2000 Time: 11:55 AM From: Jerry Lawson The Hartford Insurance Group 860 547-2960[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Hello! One of my customers came to me

Delete vol.

2000-08-18 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
Hi all , Again me . i inserted 20 vols. ACSLS labels volumes. issued command checkin libvol stk9710 search=yes status=scratch checklabel=barcode all scratch volumes including the volumes used by other volumes checked in as a scratch. TSM started writing data on Thise volumes. i want to remove

Re: ADSM-L Digest - 21 Jul 2000 to 22 Jul 2000 (#2000-200)

2000-08-18 Thread Lindsay Morris
NT (and most OSes) detect hardware configuration at boot time. If you restore \WINNT\SYSTEM32, you overwrite what the machine detected with what the old machine had. A bad thing. Prevention: exclude \WINNT\SYSTEM32 from backups. (Maybe exclude all of \WINNNT ? Not sure.) Solution to your

Re: Veritas BackupExec interface to *SM

2000-08-18 Thread Remeta, Mark
Hello, we were actually going to use that product because ADSM did not have an agent for Oracle running on NetWare. Basically ADSM becomes another backup device for Backup Exec. I had it running on ADSM 3.1.2.41 but it's not a very good solution. You loose all of the advantages of using ADSM.

Re: Discrepancy between standard restore and restore backupset

2000-08-18 Thread John Naylor
I am not sure if it was clear in my original note but ANE4955I (Session: 6894, Node: PORSD1) Total objects restored: 1,381,024 was the figure from the backup set restore. If anyone has seen this sort of discrepancy or has any thoughts that explain the difference, please let me know John

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread James Thompson
Adsm will backup a directory if a file is created or deleted within that directory. This pertains to NTFS partitions and not FAT partitions. This is important for people wanting to do point in time restores with the backup/archive gui. For a PIT restore using the GUI, ADSM builds the directory

Re: ms exchange updating WinNT directory

2000-08-18 Thread Remeta, Mark
Which is why you should make sure you have verexists=nolimit and retextra equal the number of days you want to be able to go back to. Mark -Original Message- From: James Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 18, 2000 1:51 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: ms

Re: Delete vol.

2000-08-18 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
I am allready having that in printed frormat . doesent say anything about deleting volumes in range. for your information i am pasting it it here again , find if anything you can ? TSm3.7.2 , (Otherwise once again i will get a mail that our server shows in help) -CHECKOut

Re: Delete vol.

2000-08-18 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
Thank you yar. "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" on 08/18/2000 04:25:36 PM Please respond to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us" @ X400 To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]/P=Internet/A= /C=us"@X400 cc: Subject: Re: Delete vol. Our server level is 3.7.3.0. Maybe the vollist feature was new in

Re: Delete vol.

2000-08-18 Thread Shekhar Dhotre
hi Just issued command : tsm: TSMcheckout libvolume stk9710 vollist=vol.log ANS8003I Process number 817 started. q actlog : 08/18/00 16:40:26 ANR2017I Administrator ADMIN issued command: CHECKOUT libvolume stk9710 vollist=vol.log 08/18/00 16:40:26 ANR0984I Process

Re: Veritas BackupExec interface to *SM

2000-08-18 Thread Joshua S. Bassi
I have heard several stories of problems trying to get this configuration to work. I had a customer a while back indicate he worked with (then Seagate) support to get it to work and they strung him out for months without ever giving him a resolution. -- Joshua S. Bassi Senior Technical

Re: Delete vol.

2000-08-18 Thread Joel Fuhrman
The syntax shown below is wrong. It should be: tsm: TSMcheckout libvolume stk9710 vollist=file:vol.log (and other options) You may want to fully qualify the file name. On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Shekhar Dhotre wrote: hi Just issued command : tsm: TSMcheckout libvolume stk9710 vollist=vol.log