I've been researching this for a client and the only "listed" platforms are
Sun Solaris and AIX - both of these platforms are further restricted by the
version level and the file system that must be on the client.
Ron L. James
Senior Software Consultant
STORServer, Inc.
719-536-4801
[EMAIL PROTEC
Raymond,
Did you grant access to all filesystems or to only a
few? This could be why you're not able to restore
them.
Thanks,
Angela
--- Raymond Chao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi,
> I am restoring from one Aix client node to
> another.
> I am able to restore some filespaces and
Hi,
I am restoring from one Aix client node to another.
I am able to restore some filespaces and not others.
The message is "No files matching search criteria were found" for
those that are NOT successful.
I looked at the "query backup " from the source node a
IBM has a Redbook for DR that goes through the
procedure in depth that can accessed off the Tivoli
web site or www.redbooks.ibm.com.
Thanks,
Angela
--- Ken Sedlacek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> TSM'ers:
>
> Our Management is finally getting where we should
> have been years ago with
> Disaster Rec
Hi TSMers,
I'm having trouble finding out if all of the following filesystem types are
supported for client file backup on HPUX.
DCFS
HFS
VxFS
UFS
Is there any known problems/issues with backing up HPUX clients ??
Thanks
Craig Murphy
Tivoli Certified Consultant
Enterprise System Management
Un
A Correction. TSM 4.2 will support NDMP V3.0
---
Mike Kaczmarski
Product Architecture
Tivoli Systems: Storage Software
(520)799-2318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hervé CHIBOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.
Wanda wrote, in part..
> I don't believe there is any 3.1 server that is still supported by
> Tivoli.
Tivoli ADSM 3.1 for AS/400 goes EOS today.
Tivoli ADSM 3.1 for VM EOS has not yet been announced and is listed as
requiring 14 months written notice (see
http://www.tivoli.com/support/st
Hi Geoff,
TSM 4.2 (coming soon this summer), will support NDMP v1.0
rv
- Original Message -
From: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:03 PM
Subject: Network Appliance
> Can someone contact me who knows the particulars of the N
TSM'ers:
Our Management is finally getting where we should have been years ago with
Disaster Recovery. I need to start getting my TSM tapes off-site and need
you advice.
Environment:
Two H70s (one test, one production), AIX 4.3.3, 3GB memory each, shared 300
GB SSA disk drawers.
One 3570 Magstar
I have recently setup TDP for Domino on our mail system which has over 1700+ mail files. I am running archivelog periodically to archive the log files. When I look at the domarc.log file it shows that there are 12 log files to be archived, but 0 archived. I am really concerned about this. I hav
>...I have no idea what
>algorithm it uses to choose a tape if there are several candidates.
See the Admin Guide, chapter 8, How the Server Selects Volumes with Collocation
Enabled; ... Disabled.
Hi,
Does anyone know if and/or when Tivoli Space Manager (formerly HSM) will
support HP-UX clients? And HP-UX TSM server?
We are looking at an SAP Archive product from Mobius (also their report
distribution), and they interface with Space Manager.
TIA
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Laboratories
TSM will select a tape with status "FILLING" that has enough capacity for
the object or aggregate that is being backed up. It will not use a new
scratch tape unless there are no FILLING tapes to use. I have no idea what
algorithm it uses to choose a tape if there are several candidates. But it
I would like to request comments on the use of HSM or Tivoli Space
Management on a Sun Solaris OS.
Specifically what versions of Solaris has it been installed on successfully
and with what version of the Veritas File System (VxFS). The Products
supported and devices web page reads Sun Solaris 2.6
>ANR0482W (session terminated - idle for more than 15 minutes)
Bob - Boost your server IDLETimeout option, as it's too small for
real-world client work.
Richard Sims, BU
FYI
SET OPT CMD FOR DSMSERV.OPT FILE
Pl look at perf tuning and set the values.
-Original Message-
From: Brazner, Bob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 1:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Is the session lost or not?
>From the server activity log, I'm seeing bac
We recently converted a client to backup direct to tape. In the client
log, I'm seeing excessive "waiting for mount of offline media" messages.
Normally, I would expect to such a message after a complete tape's worth of
data had been transmitted, but I'm seeing the messages repeatedly come out
af
>From the server activity log, I'm seeing backup sessions being lost due to
ANR0482W (session terminated - idle for more than 15 minutes). The server
activity log goes on to show that a new backup session (using an entirely
new session id) starts for the client soon after that (and the new sessi
Welcome to Oblivion.
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> To all,
>
> Is there anyone who can get me a contact for pricing on all the TSM products
> who will actually get back to me? I have been running in circles trying to
> get answers from my IBM contacts to no avail. If they don'
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Gill, Geoffrey L. wrote:
> To all,
>
> Is there anyone who can get me a contact for pricing on all the TSM products
> who will actually get back to me? I have been running in circles trying to
> get answers from my IBM contacts to no avail. If they don't want to sell to
> me
Geoff,
Good Luck! It has been my experience that pricing Tivoli products is
damn near impossible until you get the bill. You can try the tivoli
manamgement points (tmp) calculator at
http://www.tivoli.com/Tivoli_Electronic_Support/Pricing.nsf/Welcome?OpenForm
but it is not 100% complete.
The las
To all,
Is there anyone who can get me a contact for pricing on all the TSM products
who will actually get back to me? I have been running in circles trying to
get answers from my IBM contacts to no avail. If they don't want to sell to
me then I'll go someplace else.
Thanks,
Geoff Gill
TSM Admi
Can someone contact me who knows the particulars of the Netapp, it's NDMP
protocol, and how it will actually interact with TSM to do it's backups. I
have them coming in tomorrow for a meeting and would like to be a little
more knowledgeable so I can ask smarter/better questions if I need to. The
l
select node_name as "Nodes with no filespaces:", -
date(reg_time) as "Registered:", -
date(lastacc_time) as "Last Access:" -
from nodes where node_name not in -
(select node_name from filespaces)
-Original Message-
From: Rajesh Oak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31,
Brian,
Couple of questions.
How are you specifying the NDS backup, and is the tree replicated on multiple
servers? Also, do you have the most recent TSA nlms?
Obviously 18 hrs is a 'bit' excessive! We back up one as part of the regular
backup of one of the servers in the tree with no additional
Does anyone have a script that can report all the clients that have never backed up.
No Filespaces are present for that node.
I am running TSM 4.1 on WIn2000 Sp1.
Thanks in advance.
Rajesh Oak
Get 250 color business cards for FREE!
http://businesscards.lycos.com/vp/fastpath/
There is a presentation on the Tivoli website comparing 3590, 9840, LTO, and
DLT.
http://www.tivoli.com/news/press/analyst/tsm.pdf
I agree with Jeff & Dwight;
if you are used to 3590, consider that LTO is a competitor to DLT, not a
competitor to the 3590.
I would base the decision on load:
If y
Brian Nick wrote:
>We are running TSM 3.7.4 on OS/390 2.10 and are using the TSM 3.7.2 client
>on a Netware server. Here is our situation.
>
>Our NDS Tree backup take about 18 hours for us to complete. I am being
>told by our Netware support group that this is a TSM client issue because
>accordin
> Hello All,
> We are testing out the use of SUBFILE processing. We have a user
> group that would have to do dial-in backups or we buy them zip drives.
> Using SUBFILE processing, a very narrow include/exclude list, and
> compression we still se backups that are close to 40MB. We insist
I've found that reboots in order to proceed with the install have been necessary on
around 1/3 to 1/2 of the NT boxes I've done. It's definitely related to the Installer,
possibly whether it's been used before or not.
Just curious, why the push to upgrade, other than support (and that d**n DST b
Yes, I was told the receive side is digital.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Robert Clark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 12:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: ANYONE ELSE TRY USIG SUBFILES?
5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances
I have done restores on NT5 from a similar config, and had NO problems.
I agree that autonegotiate is a likely culprit when the throughput is that
slow. When autonegotiate is the problem, our network guys can see errors
being recorded on the switch; ask for help there.
Another possibility is th
The 3590's are the better drives...
(how many LTO drives do you see in MVS environments ?)
and especially if you have the E drives !
We are still running on 5 year old B1A's
(have about 40 or 50 of them around...)
the tsm environments take in a total of 2 TB nightly (on average)
In 5 years (best I
5K bytes/sec is good for 56k under good circumstances isn't it?
With lossage due to a less than optimal PPP implementation, 2k doesn't
sound all that unusual. (To me anyway.)
Is at least one of the ends a digital connection?
[RC]
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 12:31:52PM -0400, MC Matt Cooper (2838)
Hello All,
We are testing out the use of SUBFILE processing. We have a user
group that would have to do dial-in backups or we buy them zip drives.
Using SUBFILE processing, a very narrow include/exclude list, and
compression we still se backups that are close to 40MB. We insist that the
Greetings,
Does anyone out there know about plans for Tivoli client support for AIX 5L
version 5.1?
I called Tivoli support, who recommended speaking with our marketing rep,
who then could contact Tivoli development...though I would ping this forum
as well.
Thanks.
John Bremer
LANL
Were having problems with our TSM server hanging during nightly
backups.
server: RS/6K-S7A
tsm:TSM 4.1.1
Drives: 3494 with 8 3590E drives
Within the last several weeks our server has hung during nightly
backups about a half dozen times. Actually, we don't think it's
hung, just running ve
Ruud,
You CAN use ANY of the devices listed. Notice (looking at the Gateway) that
your Medium Changer is listed on the first SCSI channel. Be aware that the
communications path between TSM and your library is across THAT path. Since
you only have one SAN Data Gateway (and I assume on FCA on yo
Hey John
pl let us know the developments.
thankx
BALANAND PINNI.
PHONE 314-206-5911.
EM:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PG:1-800-451-6897.
-Original Message-
From: John Bremer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 11:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AIX 5
Greetings,
Does
We run into this problem a lot. I believe there are a couple of issues
here. One issue, that Gerhard mentioned, is that the log utilization does
not drop quickly when the db backup apparently finishes. The other issue
is that a thread can have the log "pinned", preventing the log utilization
fr
Hello Folks
I was wondering if someone might give me a clue. I'm running a command
file to do backups for the TDP for Domino client. The command file is run
and the log file sindicate connection to the servers etc. I have the mount
window up and the server calls for a mount request, sees the
David,
Lisa is exactly right! We decided to save some money and go with LTO, but
research shows that the 3590 would have been MUCH better. Don't get me
wrong - the LTO technology outperforms even the new Super DLT - and blows
the old DLT's away. But if you already have 3590e's in house, you'll
I will be out of the office from 31/05/2001 until 30/06/2001.
If urgent please send to Storeuk or contact Martin Woolf
Hello everyone.
We are running TSM 3.7.4 on OS/390 2.10 and are using the TSM 3.7.2 client
on a Netware server. Here is our situation.
Our NDS Tree backup take about 18 hours for us to complete. I am being
told by our Netware support group that this is a TSM client issue because
according to t
This is exactly how we backup our more than 200 Oracle databases. We
have a script (actually, a rather large suite of scripts) that create
the backup in a a staging area on the db server. The backup is
completely contained under a directory that contains the db name,
date, time, type (hot/cold),
I think the best bet is to plan for reboot on ALL these systems.
One of my methods on these systems BTW is to totally delete old version(s) and then
install new versions, saving dsm.opt of course. I find that in many cases there may
be two *SM versions on system and some other misc stuff, so t
David-
For what it's worth, we just went through an eval of which to expand to
and decided to go with the Cadillac-- the 3590. For thruput, it will beat
LTO hands down, due to the stopping and starting technology on the drives.
We archive Oracle data thru an SP switch, and we get rates of 40MB/
Hi Rajesh,
I'v added the TCPCLIENTADDRESS in dsm.sys file, it solved the problem.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Phillip Guan
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rajesh Oak
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 1:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
I can tell you from experience that if you are upgrading to 4.1.x client on
an NT 4.0 machine you will need to reboot. Starting with 4.1.x they use the
w2k installer and this requires a reboot after the installation of the w2k
installer before it installs the client. On w2k clients a reboot is n
Upgarde ur server and client file sets to 3.7.2 atleast.
and all the patches on client and server side.
Because there were tons of problems with 3.1 ver .
This is only a suggesion.
-Original Message-
From: Chibois, Herve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:13 AM
To:
What is the speed of tcp/ip set for IF card I mean is it auto negotiate mode
???If yes change to 100mbps on server side.
-Original Message-
From: Chibois, Herve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Slow NT Restore
Hi Phil,
-
Hello,
I have read some archives about LTO vs 3590. I get mixed feelings about
which is better depending on the situation. I would like to ask for your
opinions on my specific case. Here are the facts:
I am a TSM newbie < 6 months.
Current hardware is:
3494 w/2 3590E1A drives
3466-C00 w/H50 serv
My site is about to upgrade its Windows NT client systems to 4.1.2.12.
We are starting with the ones that currently have 3.1.0.6 client code,
and will subsequently upgrade the ones with various service levels of
the 3.7 code. We currently have to plan every upgrade to allow for the
possibility of
The first time a node goes into the Archive GUI you will get the following
message:
ANS5148W The server needs to do a one-time conversion of your archive data
before you
can continue. This operation may take a long time, and cannot be canceled
once it has started. Are you willing to wait for the
> However, with a
> schedmode of prompted,
> the server is the machine that may actually have to
> do the resolution, in
> order to contact the clients.
With schedmode prompted, the client schedule service connects to the TSM
server and the TSM server stores it's IP address. The TSM server conta
I also vote for archives. Archives are designed to keep a set of related
files together. You do not want any type of versioning to occur when doing
a file level / os level backup of your database files.
James Thompson
>From: David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
Hi Phil,
- what do you see in a 'q node XXX f=d 'in the lines '% xxx Wait Last
Session' ?
- Have you ever had good restore rates with your TSM server ?
- what are your TCPxxx client params (in dsm.opt) ?
- How much RAM does your AIX box have and how much is allocated for
network buffers ? (no -
Jeff
Equipment involved:
IBM 2108-G07 SAN Data Gateway (1)
IBM 2109-S16 SAN Switch (2)
IBM 3584 LTO Library (1 Library with 4 SCSI Drives)
Entering the "lsdev -Cc tape" command within AIX produces this output:
rmt0 Available 14-08-01-1,0 IBM 3580 Ultrium Tape Drive (FCP)
rmt1 Available 14-08-01-
>There are no TDPs available (Dynix) so we have to use the command line client
>to backup.
Well, there is also the TSM API where, if you program in C, and your database
system itself provides an API, you could potentially create your own client.
It's not for everyone, but it's there.
Richard
All,
sorry if this is a beginner question, but that's what I am at this ...
I have a TSM server (v 3.7.4) on AIX and it has 1 3590 library attached to
it.
I'm labelling some tapes, but as we do not have a barcode reader I'm forced
(apparently ) to enter the labels manually one by one.
however if
$)C
Hello,
A few things to check...
Make sure the SQL userid "sa" has the Sysadmin fixed server role.
It appears that you are using "sa" because your command line entry
does not show you using /SQLSECURE option (for Windows authentication)
or the /SQLUSER and /SQLPWD options for entering altern
You can extend that argument almost forever...
If you go to disk, you have a single point of failure until migration is
done.
If migration gets done, you still have single pint of failure until copy is
made.
Once copy is made, you are only protected against media failure until copy
is sent offsit
One question pops up to consider in the planning. Do the files they put in the
staging area have a unique filename each day or will it be the same filename each day?
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321
Right. Sorry, I meant don't set HI to 0, but I said LO.
Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 8:35 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: adsm 3.1 and stgpool
DO IT WITH AN ARCHIVE ! ! !
A big reason is to keep "sets" of backups/archives complete...
If you do things with backups (versions) say something goes wrong half way
through your processing...
you now have not one but two incomplete sets of the data base
one is the set that only got half processe
Suad,
You can just set the VEREXIST and VERDELETED to "NOLIMIT". This removes
version count from the algorithm, and retention is solely controlled by
date. This is what Tivoli recommends if you intend to do Point In Time
Restores. As long as you can control how many backups get done, it
should
We are about to start backing up our enterprise databases.
They are comprised of about 15 Oracle instances ranging from 7GB to 25GB.
About a third are being backed up nightly and the others are either 1 or 2 times
weekly.
On the server side, we will set up a seperate stgpool hierarchy as they the
Patrick,
Sorry if some of these questions seem silly,
but sometimes the obvious is overlooked...
1. Are you certain the other backups succeeded?
If you are seeing "active" backups from Day 1,
then it would normally mean that no other "full"
backups would have been done. Otherwise, the
Check the port on the network device for alignment errors also.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Lambelet,Rene,VEVEY,FC-SIL/INF.
[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 3
IBM doesn't make the tapes ... FUJI actually makes the tapes (I think one or
two other companies do also) They will sell direct.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART CONFIDENTIAL
-Original Message-
From: Mark Stapleton [SMTP:[
hello,
i like using lowm=0 highm=10 to avoid the thrashing
René Lambelet
Nestec S.A. / Informatique du Centre
55, av. Nestlé CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland)
*+41'21'924'35'43 7+41'21'924'28'88 * K4-117
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our site: http://www.nestle.com
This message is intend
>After I finished configuration about LTO 3581, I try to label Tape.
>After I finished labeling tape , I can't see it in the volume library
Michael - Follow the guidance in the TSM Admin Guide. If you use the
recommended Label Libvolume command, you can label and
check in tapes in one
1. try "q actlog begind=-2 s=recla" (or maybe s=100 or some other search
string) to see when the reclamation threshold got reset. If you find that
it happened at 15:00, then say "q actlog begind=-2 begint=14:55" to see who
issued what command. That ought to shed some light.
2. I suggest you not
For further testing try moving the content the needed tapes to the primary
storagepool.
Redoo the backup.
Good luck,
Stefan Holzwarth
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Phil Stockton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 31. Mai 2001 12:23
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betref
Phil,
Did you check the general network speed between the client and the server
( e.g. ftp put and get a large file ). If you are in a switched 100 mb
network
sometimes ( i saw it on our Compaq and RS6000 servers ) the autonegotiate
port speed / mode does not work correct. We set all components (
I agree with the fixed full duplex 100 mb/s. Performance increased by a
factor of 12 for the modified clients.
René Lambelet
Nestec S.A. / Informatique du Centre
55, av. Nestlé CH-1800 Vevey (Switzerland)
*+41'21'924'35'43 7+41'21'924'28'88 * K4-117
email [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit our site: ht
Hi out there,
I was just staring at my screen, as you do sometimes when out of the blue it
displayed
ANR0984I Process 585 for DELETE ARCHCONVERSION started in the BACKGROUND
at
11:45:27.
ANR0985I Process 585 for DELETE ARCHCONVERSION running in the BACKGROUND
completed with completion state SUC
I had this problem on my 4.11 servers with TSM client 4.1.2.0. Per Tivoli I
had to upgrade to client version 4.1.2.16. The other option was to stop
running the dsmc scheduler & use cron to kick off my backups. So far they
seem to be running ok. They have been running this version for about 2
Hi
We are trying to restore the C drive on a NT server 4.0 Service Pack 5. We
have TCPIP 100 mb full duplex. The client is 3.1.0.8 and the server is
3.1.2.90 on AIX 4.3.2.
We are observing very slow restore times. There is no waiting for tape
mounts but when I query sessions wait times of some
Hello everybody,
is there anybody who have seen the problem discribed below. In order to
solve here is an additional information.
During the task that stops the funktionality of the processor, the backup
client (Version 4.1.2) backuped the volume
Sys: of the Novell Server Version 4.11 The task as
Can anybody know how it works??
Please check this out and give me a clear answer..
Thanks in advance..
05/31/2001 11:58:46,COMMAND LINE : sqldsmc /backupfull:* /adsmnode:donghwa_sql
/adsmpwd:donghwa_sql /logfile:c:\progra~1\tivoli\tsm\mssql\sql.log /logprune:14
05/31/2001 11:58:46,Loggin
I will be out of the office starting 05/30/2001 and will not return until
06/11/2001.
I will respond to your message when I return.
__
The information contained in this communication is intended solely for the
use of the indi
I would search the activity log for all references to the stgpool of
interest. You should see the command that does the update. Hopefully with
the time stamp you can find the culprit.
Ex: query act begind=today-1 search=some_stgpool_name
On Thu, 31 May 2001, Steve de Souza wrote:
> Hi,
>
The install readme says use ultrium or ultriumc.
Also, as Richard mentioned, look at the microcode on the drives.
Cheers, Suad
--
On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 02:18:23PM +0100, Fab System wrote:
> All
>
> We have 4 LTO drives in a 3584 libary which is connected using a SAN Data
> Gateway. When I look
Before we got proper labels we made a bunch of labels on a crappy $200 colour
inkjet printer using light card that are stuck on with a glue stick, they are
hand cut so they are slightly crooked.
I can definitely say they none of them had problems (except a couple labels fell off
when we used infer
85 matches
Mail list logo
