Re: cuSignOnResp (SOLUTION ! ! !)

2001-07-05 Thread Cook, Dwight E
but the problem is if the admin id doesn't exist... so by deleting the "bogus" admin name, the problem will be created ! this seems to currently be mainly on Sun Solaris 6 boxes with tsm 3.7.2 clients on the client you will see a 06/15/01 15:41:32 cuSignOnResp: Server rejected session; r

Moving Nodes to a different domain

2001-07-05 Thread Joe Cascanette
I have setup some separate domains and have moved the nodes to them, however I am under the impression that the separate Domains will have their own tapes, how do I move the file space?. Yes the file space shows up in the new Domain under the node, however there is no process that starts to actual

Re: Antwort: Re: total # of bytes by each client on a daily basis

2001-07-05 Thread William Boyer
I'm assuming it's the amount of data transferred. -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gerhard Wolkerstorfer Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 5:35 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Antwort: Re: total # of bytes by each client on a daily basi

Ask for a Linux Mandrake 8.0 Client for ADM 3.1

2001-07-05 Thread Juan R. Obando
Hi ADSM's We have an ADSM Version 3.1.2.90 Server, and have some machines with Linux Mandrake Version 8.0. Is there any ADSM Client suitable for this Plattform ?? Thanks in Advance Ing. Juan Reynaldo Obando AIX/HACMP/ADSM Administrator

Solaris 7/8 Slow Restore

2001-07-05 Thread Boireau, Eric (MED)
Hello, I have an issue with some Sun boxes. Backup works fine (I am able to overload the Network 100Mb/s). But the restore troughput seems to be limited to 10Mb/s. Network config seems good I able to do FTP between the box with good transfert rate. Tests are made with 256MB files size and disk stg

Re: cuSignOnResp (SOLUTION ! ! !)

2001-07-05 Thread Lisa Cabanas
Wouldn't it be easier/cleaner to just delete the "bogus" admin name? I have noticed when you register new clients, that if you don't type in NONE where it says By default, an administrative userid will be created for accessing the client remotely. Specify NONE, below, if you do not want this use

Re: Database backup performance

2001-07-05 Thread Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
*1* I have increased it to 9 to see what happens. This could help in a *BIG* way, expecially migration and such. Thanks for pointing it out. === Zoltan Forray Virginia Commonwealth University University Computing Center e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] voice: 804-828-4807

Antwort: Starting Script from server console

2001-07-05 Thread Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
Wolfgang, the documentation may be wrong The fact is - that you can't Run Scripts from the server console. But the reason is clear: Some of the scripts are a) making a lot of output und b) you could start some foreground process and for the time, the Script is running, your console would be bu

Re: Distribution of PERL TSM Module

2001-07-05 Thread John Marquart
There already exists / did exist one AdsM/TSM related perl module - though I believe its author has fallen off the face of the earth or something. (Never responds to e-mail.) I vote for your second approach: Create a TSM modules, then have specific capabilities be part of derived modules - ala

Clarification on support of IBM 3583 with TSM 3.7.4 on Windows 20 00

2001-07-05 Thread Rushforth, Tim
I know there has been a lot of mail on this in the past and the recommendation seems to be to go to 4.x to support the 3583 on Windows 2000. I just want to to clarify if the 3583 is supported on 3.7.4 running on Windows 2000. (We need the extra capacity now, but may not be able to update to 4.x f

Re: Distribution of PERL TSM Module

2001-07-05 Thread Wallace, Gary C
I would like a copy.Thanks Gary Wallace Storage Engineer Email:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Office:(916) 356-6465 Pager: (888) 787-9831 Cellular:(916) 799-4479 <<...OLE_Obj...>> -Original Message- From: Jörg Nouvertné [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 1:14 AM T

Re: TSM 4.2

2001-07-05 Thread Andy Raibeck
Because someone uploaded the Win9x version of the README.FTP file instead of the WinNT version. This has since been fixed. Regards, Andy Andy Raibeck IBM Tivoli Systems Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked." "T

Re: Solaris 2.6 bad performance with TSM

2001-07-05 Thread Richard Sims
>We are running TSM 4.1.2 server on an enterprise E4500 server with Solaris >2.6. Our performance is terrible... Bonnie - Our AIX system is an NFS server to various client system types, including Solaris. NFS performance with AIX was just dandy; but Solaris users complained of poor perf

Antwort: Re: total # of bytes by each client on a daily basis

2001-07-05 Thread Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
Bill, when you fell in love with this table: Do you know, what the value in the Field BYTES means ? When the activity is BACKUP, is the value in the field BYTES the amount of BYTES TRANSFERRED or BYTES BACKUPED ? I remarked, when a Node is backing up and some big files change during the Backup (an

Re: cuSignOnResp (SOLUTION ! ! !)

2001-07-05 Thread Cook, Dwight E
Richard, YOU GOT IT ! ! ! ! If you have clients that were registered prior to the level that automatically created admin id's and those clients still don't have ids... you get the blah 53. I just took a box that was causing problems... registered an admin, set the auth, and tried a client sessio