Hi,
our laptop users begin to call us after upgrading the TSM client from
3.1.0.6 to 4.1.3 (Win95). Our server is 4.1.4 (OS/390).
Since the upgrade, incremental backups take 5 times longer (see below). Why
??
08/31/2001 15:57:28 ANE4952I (Session: 163, Node: CHVEV0295) Total number
of objects
Yes, we have, by using REXX and SMTP.
Via OPC we have scheduled job BLC1DXMB and BLC1DXME (which is dependent on
BLC1DXMB):
//BLC1DXMB JOB (WY0130ASHK3O,7),'UICM/15',
// CLASS=0,GROUP=,USER=,MSGCLASS=P
/*JOBPARM SYSAFF=E9
//*
//STEP0030 EXEC PGM=IKJEFT01
//SYSPRINTDD DSN=
hi *smers,
It really surprising me that how q occupancy is not showing few nodes.
whereas , q file space still show .
whats happening !! can any tsm guru can help me out this.
thanks in advance
regards
sree.
L&g
We have TSM4.2 on AIX 4.3 and 3584 LTO library.
09/10/01UYA005, Mountable, 09/10/01, 06:04:50,
LIB_3584_1
on the 10th this volume UYA005 was moved to offsite vault using :
move drm * wherestate=mountable remove=untileefull
move drm * wherestate=notmountable tostate=vaul
Probably your tape drives need to be cleaned (see APAR IC27618). Try using
the CLEAN DRIVE command.
Stefano Massi
TSM 4.1 Certified Consultant
Alan Cheski
Cc:
Inviato da: Oggetto: ANR8302E I/O error cc=42
if the tape contained a TSM database backup (q volhist type=dbb) then your
setting for drmdbbackupexpiredays has come into affect. find out the setting
for that with 'q drmstatus'
if the tape contained normal client data, then your setting for noreusedelay
will keep the tape offsite until it's pa
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Large
Sent: 24 September 2001 14:22
To: 'Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ISES-31'
Subject: RE: copy storage pool volumes missing
Ruud,
No problem.
'delay period for volume reuse' needs to be greater than
drmdbbackupexpiredays because..
imagine that you need to r
-Original Message-
From: Van Ruler, Ruud R SITI-ISES-31
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 24 September 2001 14:00
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Cc: 'Matthew Large'
Subject: RE: copy storage pool volumes missing
Matthew
thanks for the quick response.
(q volhist type=dbb) only shows 4 tap
Our first try with the SAP backup resulted in a failure because of only 2
tape drives available when it requested 4. This doesn't make sense to me so
maybe someone can explain. Why wouldn't the backup run and just start using
the 2 drives. Then when the other 2 came available it pick them up inste
Eric,
if you set-up an EtherChannel on both sides (!) it is like connecting
through 400 Mb/s interface (virtual one which distributes load on real ones
- ent0, ent1, ...). This is done at interface (OSI Level 2) and has to be
transparent to your sessions. Anyway you must have 4 adapters on both e
Matthew
thanks for the quick response.
(q volhist type=dbb) only shows 4 tapes.
drmdbbackupexpiredays is set to 7. If uya005 was a DBB volume then uya005
should be available as from tomorrow
but this is not the case as uya005 contained client data:
copy storage pool STG_DATA_1C
For all cop
You need to modify your initSID.utl and include this option:
BRARCHIVEMGTCLASS MC_SAPD00_LOG1 MC_SAPD00_LOG2
With this option you can do two redo logs copies.
Check the Sessions option. If you want two copies the Sessions must be
two, and the REDOLOG_COPIES must be two too.
The management cl
This would happen if a node has backed up only directories but not files.
You have information stored only in the TSM DB but no actual files stored.
So info about the filesystem is there without occupancy.
Try yourself a empty directory or one with only subdirectories:
dsmc incr d:\tmp\
dsmc incr
On the first part, nope, not that I've found...
if you elect to go directly to tape, you want to make sure you have enough
tape drives available when it starts...
This is why I like to go to a diskpool first (even though we are about to
roll out our first "direct to tape" environment)
On the BKI,
Hi all ,
I just ended new installation of TSM server 4.2 on OS/390 with Exchange
clients
with TDP for Exchange version 2.2 - from time to time full backup ends
with error ( from TSM server log ) ANE4993E and ACN3502 with rc=418
( TSM B/A client 4.2.0 ) on NT4 and Win2000 . No additional messages i
Because when time comes to restore from this DB your volumes could be
already overwritten. Do you want this.
Check carefully disaster recovery procedure if your TSM server and primary
pool volumes are completely destroyed!
So if you want to restore DB which is 7 days old your volumes must be kept
> I just ended new installation of TSM server 4.2 on OS/390 with Exchange
> clients
> with TDP for Exchange version 2.2 - from time to time full backup ends
> with error ( from TSM server log ) ANE4993E and ACN3502 with rc=418
> ( TSM B/A client 4.2.0 ) on NT4 and Win2000 . No additional messages
On 24 Sep 2001, at 15:46, Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
> Eric,
>
> if you set-up an EtherChannel on both sides (!) it is like connecting
> through 400 Mb/s interface (virtual one which distributes load on real ones
> - ent0, ent1, ...). This is done at interface (OSI Level 2) and has to be
> transpa
Ray,
let me point small and very rare but important issue:
If you update AIX 4.3(.1) to 4.3.2 or 4.3.3 you have the ability to change
a volume group to "big volume group" using chlv -B
If you make a mistake to change to rootvg to big vg AIX 4.3 and 4.3.1 are
completely uncapable to handle it.
I a
The backup will run as you wish. Your problem seems to be that you have
MAX_SESSIONS set to 4 but your server stanza down at the bottom of the
config only has SESSIONS 2. The way backint works, MAX_SESSIONS is the true
control - you WILL run this many sessions, and if you don't have that many
avai
TSM Gurus,
I found several reference to my problem in the archive but, did not find an
explanation or a real fix for it. If I over looked it, I will shamefully
take the time-out chair in the corner.
Our TSM environment is relatively new (< 6 mos). We are running 4.1.3
server on AIX 4.3.3 ML6 w
Maybe the tapes don't have proper internal labels. Look at the LABEL
LIBVOLUME command.
Jim Sporer
At 10:11 AM 9/24/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>TSM Gurus,
>
>I found several reference to my problem in the archive but, did not find an
>explanation or a real fix for it. If I over looked it, I will
I did try and do a drive cleaning. As soon as ADSM
tries to read the file afterwards, it fails with the
same message and cc=422. And the drive cleaning light
comes on again. I even replaced the cleaning tape with
a new one and ran the cleaning again...same result.
Must be a hardware thing.
Al
---
Matt,
BACKUP_DIR is what Oracle uses to decide where on disk to backup the data
when using Oracle's Internal Media Manager (DO NOT set this while using
TDP for Oracle). What this is telling you is that Oracle/Rman does not
recognize that there is a third party vendor available to use. Follow the
TSM guru's
We are implementing an NSM network storage manager model C01 with a LTO
library attached to it. At the moment the NSM has 87 nodes and a total of 16
TB. But we are now experiencing , already after a few months, a lot of
troubles with tapes and drives.
We seem to have a number of broke
If there is no internal label, or the internal label does not match the bar
code, or if the WRITE PROTECT thingy is set on the tape, it can cause such
problems.
1) eject one of the tapes and check the WRITE PROTECT thingy to make sure it
is NOT enabled.
2) Since you know there is no data on the t
Hi,
do you checkin with barcode or reading the label? If the former, maybe the
tapes aren't labelled? Try label libv with overwrite=no.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen - With best regards
Serdeczne pozdrowienia - Slan agus beannacht
Paul Baines
TSM/ADSM Consultant
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Vo
Thank for reply Del ,
I checked Tivoli knowledge base and I find following for TDP for SQL
APAR= IC31171 SER=IN INCORROUT
PROBLEM IN TSM API THAT CAN CAUSE TDP FOR SQL TO FAIL BACKUP
W/ ERROR ACO0302E A FAILURE OCCURED ON STRIPE NUMBER (0),RC=418
Status: CLOSED
>As already Petr wrote use convert archive. This a
>half-documented command -
>it is not available (in my) Administrator's Reference but you
>can find it
>through help as you can see:
>
>tsm: PUMBA.ACIT.BG>help convert arch
>CONVERT ARCHIVE
>CONVERT ARCHIVE (Allow Clients to Query Archive Files by
I would label them again.
Or at least check them out and check them back in with "checklabel=yes"
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: Taylor, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 10:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: volume status being changed erroneously
T
> Do you think that TDP for Exchange can be affected by this error ?
> Can I replace API for TDP ?
>
> Regards
>Petr
Petr,
No. APAR IC31171 cannot happen with TDP for Exchange.
Thanks,
Del
Del Hoobler
IBM Corporation
[EMAIL PR
hi Eric,
I am not sure whether it's feasible or not because I don't know how
etherchannel works. Is data going to go through four etherchannels
because you start four sessions? If so, your implementation might work.
Make sure not to start more sessions than your max mount point for your
node on
Remember no matter how fast your network is you can only move data as fast
as your disk will read or write. I have a setup similiar to this and run
multiple sessions on our Oracle server but don't get gig throughput because
of how fast it can read from disk where the Oracle database lies. The ma
Hi * SMs,
I have a drive(/dev/rmt2) proble showing "drive unavailable since /09/23/01 09:09:27"
I used update commad to make it online, but I could not do.
we have total 8 drives in that third drive /dev/rmt2 is giving this problem.Remaining
drives working properly.
Please can anybody send pro
hi Matt,
BACKUP_DIR not set is issued by Oracle internal library. Your oracle is
still linked with Oracle internal disk library. Please perform the steps
described in the manual to re-link oracle with TDPO.
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/storage_mgr/admanual.htm#op
Is it possible to group query output by a value that is *not* directly
present in a column in a table? What I'm trying to achieve is something
like producing a tally of volumes that are pending, grouped by day that
they went pending.
If I try something like this:
select count(*),cast(pen
We have just installed a Virtual Tape System and my Storage Administrator
is wanting to move our onsite server backups to the VTS, does anyone know
of any issues with doing this?
Is the drive available to the operating system? On occasion we've seen the
drive as unavailable when we enter lsdev -Cc tape.
At 01:36 PM 9/24/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi * SMs,
>
>I have a drive(/dev/rmt2) proble showing "drive unavailable since
>/09/23/01 09:09:27"
>I used update commad to mak
>I have a drive(/dev/rmt2) proble showing "drive unavailable since
>/09/23/01 09:09:27"
>I used update commad to make it online, but I could not do.
Your drive has probably suffered a hardware problem: have you
inspected the drive yet? There should be an indication of a problem
there, and probab
My goof... I mis-typed your FROM clause. I should have written:
select count(*), cast(pending_date as date) as "Reclaimed" -
from volumes as pending where status='PENDING' -
group by pending_date
But not my question becomes, why do you have "from volumes as pending"
instead of just "fro
I think there are a couple of problems that stand out:
1) For the pending_date, you want to say
as "Reclaimed"
not
as 'Reclaimed'
(note the double versus single quotes)
2) In the "group by" clause, use the actual column name PENDING_DATE
So
select count(*), cast(pending_date a
Andy,
Thanks for the feedback. I may not have been clear in stating my original
question, and now that I've gone back and re-read your ADSM SQL reference,
I think what I'm looking for may not be possible within the syntax of the
SQL Query.
Just to clarify:
>But not my question becomes, why do
> So we can dismiss a error at the factory.
I wouldn't necessarily say so. We recently purchased a 3583 library and
40 LTO tapes -- within the last 6 months or so.
My tape drives rejected three of them with error #6 (bad media). So, I
RMA'd them, and got three replacements sent to me. Of thos
There's lots of misunderstanding about Etherchannel. Check out this
Cisco web page for a highlevel overview.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/media/lan/ether/channel/pro
dlit/faste_an.htm
In article , Lawrence Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
>Hi:
>Earlier this year we migrated to 3.7.2 from 3.1.
>
>That involved a database migration, but otherwise was straightfoward.
>
>Has anyone gone through the 3.7.2 to 4.1 migration?
>
>Is there a database migration invol
When I had the same problem I used
echo "/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/bin1/dsmc sched -pass=XXX
>/tmp/dsmsched.log 2>&1" | at now
This worked ok but the "nohup" does not. I have no explanation why.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Paschal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2001 ã
I have found the following client options must be in the server stanza, but are not documented as such in the TSM 4.2 UNIX Client manual
DirMC
EnableLanFree
LanFreeCommmethod
LanFreeShmPort
LanFreeTCPPort
ResourceUtilization
Attached is my spreadsheet summary of the client, server, and storage ag
The original question was what can you do and with what setup.
HP client OS, Informix Database, 100 Base T on the client to four Gigabits
autoport aggregated together on the server(4.3.3 AIX and 4.1.3 TSM) . The
database backup is configured and runs 6 onbar processes at the same time
for the
Query the drive from the OS using this command:
mtlib -l /dev/lmcp0 -f /dev/rmt2 -qD
This should tell you the status of the drive. If it hangs, I would call a
CE, or check the a SAN switch with a switchshow commmand.
Jeff Bach
Home Office Open Systems Engineering
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
WAL-MART
when check with lsdev -Cc tape showing rmt2 is available.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/24/01 01:52pm >>>
Is the drive available to the operating system? On occasion we've seen the
drive as unavailable when we enter lsdev -Cc tape.
At 01:36 PM 9/24/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>Hi * SMs,
>
>I have a dri
Greetings,
I'm getting ready to upgrade to 4.1.3 this weekend (as we also go from
2.6 to 2.10 on OS\390) and I'm wondering how long the upgradedb process
might take. Presently we're at 3.1.2.50 with a DB of 9GB that's 80%
utilized. This is on a 9672-XA
So far the guesses (both educated and unedu
Je serai absent(e) du 09/24/2001 au 09/28/2001.
En cas d'urgence, veuillez contacter M.Roger Viret au 021 313 78 31 ou 079
250 85 72 qui me contactera en cas de besoin.
Mon remplaçant est M. Massimo Galizia et est atteignable au 021 313 78 04
(079 250 85 73)
Just suggesting...
I've been throught a similar situation once, and the only thing that worked
was a stop/start on the TSM Server.
Rgs,
Mauricio
Muthyam Reddy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
M> cc:
This has been discussed pretty thoroughly on the list in the past; go to
www.adsm.org and search on VTS.
Here is the information I posted last time; in general, yes there are
performance issues to consider. Whether or not you can live with them
depends on your environment:
+
I have with the 4.2 client
-Original Message-
From: taford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2001 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Authoritative Restore on W2K
Has anyone successfully done an authoritative restore using 4.1.2.12 of TSM
on W2K?
What parameters did you use in the dsm.opt file to ensure the AD was fully
backed up?
I found the Include.systemobject ALL works for 4.2.
-Tim
-Original Message-
From: Garrison, Tony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2001 3:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: A
Hi,
I am having some problems setting up my TDP for R/3. The server does
not seem to be able to brarchive due to the wrong password of. I have
checked the setup of other servers, and everything seems the same. I can go
into dsmc and do a query schedule for nodename pv_devt. Could someone l
On Sat, 22 Sep 2001 07:32:19 -0400, it was written:
>>We now have a Law Enforcement organization interested in some "unusual
>>activities" that occurred in one of sixty databases that resides on one of
>>the servers. The "request" they placed was to retain the oldest copy that
>>we had of this da
On Fri, 21 Sep 2001 16:31:14 -0600, it was written:
>We have recently installed a TSM 4.2.0 server on OS/390. We are
>interested in emailing relevant portions of the activity log and/or the
>event log to a contact person for each client, informing them of the
>results of their scheduled backups o
We currently have a procedure for that in place. We have a script that
scans the event log and parses each line that has a missed, failed or
pending message to a file. Using the file, we send an e-mail to each user
informing them their backup missed, failed or was pending at the time we
scanned
This is slightly off-topic, but thought I'd ask. I've read it's possible to
write a makesysb to a file, like on a NFS server.
My question is is it possible to restore from a makesysb if the makesysb is on a
NFS server? Can you boot from a CD, mount an NFS volume, and restore from the
makesysb wit
its a problem with media. try cleaning drive first and then audit volume
fix=no to findout if any file damaged. and try to move data again.
thanks and regards
sree,
ProtoTipo srl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 09/24/2001 18:43:58
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECT
I'm having to re-invent the wheel myself. I'd appreciate
a peek at what you're using to parse the logs, etc.
In my environment, I'm going to need to check NT, Netware,
Solaris, and AIX. At this point, the lowest common denominator
is ftp to get the files, and perl or ksh to parse them.
Any tips
A noteworthy point. You can use the AIX 433 install CD to create the
AIX 4.3 SRT. It can then handle AIX 4.3.1, 4.3.2, or 4.3.3. Generally,
you want to use the latest relese of the level of the OS to build the SRT.
Zlatko Krastev/ACIT wrote:
>Ray,
>
>let me point small and very rare but impo
Ted,
I've got it at the end but what a nasty solution :-O
select count(*),startdate -
from volumes,client_schedules -
where startdate=date(pending_date) -
and domain_name='SCHED' -
group by startdate
To achieve this I defined dummy domain ('SCHED') without nodes and created
one schedule per d
If you missed it maybe someone else missed it too. So I'm re-posting it to
the whole list.
Thanks to Mark for sharing knowledge.
-- Forwarded by Zlatko Krastev/ACIT on 25.09.2001 00:39
---
"Remeta, Mark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06.09.2001 18:22:36
Plea
Hi Eugene,
have you updated the password for TDP? As far as I know you have to set it for the
first time.
Wolfgang
>>> Eugene Awyong - Singapore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 25.09.01 01:43:42 >>>
Hi,
I am having some problems setting up my TDP for R/3. The server does
not seem to be able to bra
67 matches
Mail list logo