Hello,
you are hit by the "0" byte password bug...
Your encrypted password is stored in a file. If the encrypted password
contains a "0" byte than some TSM clients are not able to handle this.
This bug is fixed in the newer clients.
Bye
Rainer Tammer
Tivoli:
=
DCF Document ID: 1049593
I agree with Don, I prefer non-protected RAID-0 stripping for TSM disk
pools. That is unless it a unique type of data that is not re-creatable
such as backup logs.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
Rachida,
tivoli.tsm.server.com is 4.1.0.0 while tivoli.tsm.server.rte is at level
4.1.3.0
your server maintenance update is incomplete and this may cause some
memory leaks or interoperability problems. Both filesets *must* be at the
same level!
BTW: You may also consider update to v4.1.5. Have
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Oing, Stefan
> I´m searching for a Linux TSM Client supporting XFS for Linux. Does anyone
> knows something about this? Is it supported by the regular TSM Client for
> Linux???
Not explicitly, but you can take a hint from our Li
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Talafous, John G.
> We are finding that, due to incremental forever backups, recovery
> times are
> extremely long because of tape mount after tape mount after tape
> mount. In a
> real disaster, we expect to take an entire day o
Hi,
I am trying to understand DRM concept especially the reclamation part.
As the volumes become "FULL" they will be reclaimed when the data is low
(define in pool's RECLAIM value)
even if they are offsite copies. The primary pool volumes onsite will be used
and
reclaimed EMPTY copy pool vol
No, Del..I wasn't aware of this. thanks
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/02 17:18 PM >>>
> The TDP is 1.1.2
> The TSM client is 4.1.0
Larry,
I am sure you are already aware of this but I thought
I would mention it anyway. TDP for SQL 1.1.2 went
out of service on 01/26/2002. See this web page:
ht
Wanda has identified the critical choices; there is no single, right answer
because the performance factors intersect at different points for nearly
every situation -- if only because most sites are at different points along
the evolutionary development of IT infrastructure, different sized disks
> We're looking for someone with experience with the TDP for Domino setup
and
> scheduling. The admin's of the Domino boxes are not sure why when TSM
runs
> the .CMD file it doesn't work, at least that's what it looks like. They
say
> they can't find a log file on the local server either. The log
Hello all,
We're looking for someone with experience with the TDP for Domino setup and
scheduling. The admin's of the Domino boxes are not sure why when TSM runs
the .CMD file it doesn't work, at least that's what it looks like. They say
they can't find a log file on the local server either. The
That's more along the lines of what kind of info I'm digging for - but
doesn't quite address how one goes about coming up with a number or size.
There may not be a "right" or "single" answer however you must admit there
is a generalized "right" answer. Consider for example that while RAID-5
arrays
=> On Tue, 28 May 2002 14:01:25 -0700, Gerald Wichmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Bottom line is I was just speculating out loud perhaps on whether there were
> any pro's or con's to how many volumes and what size one would make the
> volumes on a RAID5 array. Say you had a 100GB RAID5 array. Wo
Well yes, it does matter.
Trouble is, there is no "right" answer.
It's a performance thing.
Assuming you have multiple clients backing up concurrently to your disk
pool, TSM will start as many I/Os as there are clients sending data, up to
the number of TSM "volumes" in your disk pool.
If you
The password are encrypt in:
WINDOWS REGISTER:
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE ->
Software ->
IBM ->
ADSM ->
CurrentVersion ->
BackupClient ->
Nodes ->
[node_name]
Here you can see the key "Password". If no exist, then you can any problem
with the TSM Client instalation or you account dont h
Hi Gerald,
I think that the answer to your question really depends on how your disk
subsystem works and spreads volumes through the RAID arrays. the object of
the game is always the same: spreading data as much as possible on all
disks in the subsystem and try to parallelize everything. in my expe
Yes I'm well aware of the different pro's and con's to using various levels
of RAID vs non-RAID. In my application protection is paramount and mirroring
is simply too wasteful to use. I've used RAID5 repeatedly in the past in
regards to TSM and have always been very happy with the results. So the
No,
Thank you.
Elenara.
---
Kind Regards,
Elenara Geraldo
Analyst Support
MML Systems
Phone: 55 41-342-7864
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 28 May 2002 13:58:16
Del Hoobler wrote:
>> I installed TDP for Exchange and after restarting the server the
>> base of data of the same it presented cor
Hi Gerald,
I think you have to consider that if you use RAID5 logical drives, you have
to calculate and write a parity every time you write any data on the disk:
so if you have a write intensive application, RAID5 is not so efficient as
other RAID protections (1,10, etc); if you have instead read
thanks edgardo. i'll try that.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/02 04:09PM >>>
Upgrade the TSM client to 4.1.3.11. This what I did.
From: Lawrence Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/28/2002 03:59
PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
We received the same error running 4.2.1.11 server code for AIX. TSM 3rd
level support told us to go to 4.2.2 server code and it should fix these
errors. BUT you have to run an 'auditdb' to rid the database of the
orphaned entries that are generating all of errors. Of course, depending on
your
You don't want to create one big RAID-5 disk. If you plan to have say
100GB disk pool, I would create say 10 RAID-5 disks - unless the
number and size of disk you have means you need bigger Raid arrays.
Also create filesystems on separate disks (UNIX system?) for disk pool vols.
Reason is for b
Hi,
I have been working with TSM Server 4.2.2.1 on Windows 2000 and TSM client.
But I don't know, what on hell, this message say. Is the DB defect?
After this event, the tsm Server stoped.
Can anybody the say where is the defect?
regards Norbert
05/28/2002 14:42:27 ANR4391I Expiration pr
Upgrade the TSM client to 4.1.3.11. This what I did.
From: Lawrence Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/28/2002 03:59
PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: TDP for MS-SQL error on restore
The TDP is 1.1.2
The T
The TDP is 1.1.2
The TSM client is 4.1.0
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/02 03:27PM >>>
I got the same error before and the problem is in the version o API. By the
way what's the version of TSM client?
From: Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/28/2002 01:54 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Sto
Since a RAID-5 array shows up as one big filesystem, what's the best
strategy for determining how many and of what size disk pool volumes to
create for your primary disk storage pool? For the most part I don't think
it really matters unlike allocating volumes on individual disks but perhaps
I'm no
Hi,
I have been working with TSM Server 4.1.5 on Windows 2000 and TSM client
4.1.13 on Windows NT.
In dsm.opt of the client I set the option "passwordaccess generate" , but
it always requests the password.
All the others options are ok.
Why does the client request the password ?
Thank you.
N
I got the same error before and the problem is in the version o API. By the
way what's the version of TSM client?
From: Del Hoobler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/28/2002 01:54 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: TDP fo
You have to change the domain statement as you have done (this is a pain!)
and you should be able to use the "Backupregistry" option.
Below is from a 4.2 manual, I assume 5.1 is similar:
Backupregistry
The backupregistry option specifies whether to back up the Windows registry
during domain inc
> "ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connections failure DB-LIB
message:
> Read on TDPSQL-sqladsm-2002150210-5370 failed, status=995.
> See SQL server error log for more details."
>
> SQL server error log shows the following:
> "BackupMedium::ReportIoError: read failure on backup device
'T
> I installed TDP for Exchange and after restarting the server the
> base of data of the same it presented corrupted data.
> I know that the installation and configuration of the
> TDP non influence in the perch of data of the base
> because TSM just proposes the backup of the base online.
> He/sh
I don't know if there is a lot of people, but according to this mailing list
there are some!
In Share Session 5722: TSM Performance Tunining
(http://www.share.org/proceedings/sh98/share.htm), Tivoli mentions that
Adaptive Subfile backup is good for pst files.
Generally Outlook is closed when I d
Hi Del,
I installed TDP for Exchange and after restarting the server the base of data of the
same it presented corrupted data.
I know that the installation and configuration of the TDP non influence in the perch
of data of the base because TSM just proposes the backup of the base online.
He/she
Hi,
Add the line below in the file /etc/inittab (of the servers 3, 4 and 6) and restart
the server.
tsm:2:once:/usr/bin/dsmc sched > /dev/null 2>&1 # TSM Scheduler
Them service for the scheduler becomes automatic.
-
Verify the service
=> On Fri, 24 May 2002 11:22:01 -0400, "Seay, Paul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Yes, it will require all the inactive files to come back. But, the DR
> vendor can provide enough disk. They cannot provide 30 tape drives. So
> with about 8 tape drives restoring the pool in about 18 hours (estima
While trying to restore a 5GB MS SQL Server database in to another database with the
same configuration our DBA is getting the following error:
"ANS1017E (RC-50) Session rejected: TCP/IP connections failure DB-LIB message:
Read on TDPSQL-sqladsm-2002150210-5370 failed, status=995.
See SQL serve
Hi all,
I have six clients TSM :
NodeName Platform
Ú1) BOUIBLANE AIX
2) IBMCW AIX
3) MICHLEFEN AIX
4) OUKAIMDEN AIX
5) ÚPIONEER Linux86
6) PATAM Sun Solaris (OS level : 5.8)
ÚTSM Client Version: Version 4, Release 1, Level 0.0
And I have a schedule (Client.Backup) which run an
incremental backup
Do not worry. This is just data not entered somewhere within IBM/Tivoli.
Look carefully - price for initial purchase, maintenance renewal and
after-license renewal are equal. And also same for IBM PA Levels A, B, C,
..., J !!
Same is here in Europe but more funny - 11795.68 EUR :-)) Can you
I've seen this problem re-surface from time to time over the years. We
have a little Rexx script that we run before bringing up our TSM server
that re-configures devices to get around this problem. Here's our script:
#!/usr/local/bin/rxx
/*
adsm.device.configure - configure ADSM devices th
I was experiencing the same phenomenon - each reboot of the
server would blot out my mtx devices and I have to remove them
and then redefine them. Trying to troubleshoot another problem,
I found that the microcode for the FC adapter cards was
woefully backlevel. Once the cards were updated, no mor
Tim,
As far as I know there has not been a change in the spec of 20 subfiles
backups before a refresh - unless the file has reached 40% of its original
size which in this case it has not. So it would seem to be an undocumented
feature. perhaps a call to support is needed.
However, is there a l
The IBM Redbook - TSM 3.7.3 & 4.1 Technical guide - states "delta file
backup can occur up to 20 times before a new base file backup occurs again."
Can anyone confirm if this is still true?
I'm running 4.2.1.20 client on W2K, 4.2.0.0 Server on W2K.
I've setup a separate schedule to backup my ou
Yes, if for some reason cannot restore via the SAN the default path will
be across the LAN.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
Sr. Solutions Architect @ rs-unix.com
IBM Certified - AIX 4/5L, SAN, Shark
eServer Systems Expert -pSeries HACMP
Tivoli Certified Consultant- ADSM/TSM
Cell (415) 215-0326
-Original
TSM host is AIX 4.3.3
Recently upgraded TSM server from 4.1.3 to 4.2.1.15.
The install removed the lb0 and mtx devices.
I used smitty to put them back and they worked fine.
Now every time the host is rebooted, the lbx and mtx devices come back as
"Defined", but not "Available", and I have to put
> I installed and I configured TDP for Exchange in a server
> Windows 2000 after restarting the server, the same it
> didn't come back and its base of data was rotten.
> The fact of me has just installed TDP it could have
> caused damages to the file of the base?
> I installed same TDP in another
My experiences are a little bit different from Thomas.
We had a similar reduction, the sqls were faster, BUTafter two or three
weeks, everything went back to the point where we started. The reduction had
gone, the sql speed had gone
I'm not sure, if it will make sense (to us!) doin
Hi Guys,
A quick question:
Is it possible to restore data through a LAN that has been backed up through
a SAN. So if I make a backup with my storage agent directly to tape and
later I turn off this storage agent can I restore that data? Does TSM make a
difference between that data? I ask this be
Yes, I nearly fell off my chair until I read "only valid in the United
States and
Puerto Rico".
This announcement is a joke, isn't it?
Greetings from Austria
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
MAIL: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
TEL:++43/5574/4991-251
FAX:++43/5574/4991-820-8251
--
There is an equivialant Canadian annoucement - it is much scarier seeing the
Canadian prices! (replace all the $2,499,750 US with $4,087,000 CDN)
-Original Message-
From: Rupp Thomas (Illwerke) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: A
Thanks for the suggestion.
We finally got it to work by going to an earlier V4.1 client. The user had
updated the glibc libraries to the listed acceptable level, but not the
kernel.
Zlatko Krastev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
05/24/2002 04:42 PM
What I understood is that these prices are so high because IBM can not
remove these numbers from passport advantage.
So what they did now is making the prices virtual very high so nobody will buy.
This proofs IBM/Tivoli will go back to their 'old' pricemodel.
They could have saved some people a
Anyone else notice this ?
Can we say PRICE GOUGING !!
http://www.ibmlink.ibm.com/usalets&parms=H_302-098
Price Changes: IBM Tivoli Storage Manager
Overview
Today, IBM announces increases in one-time charges on features of IBM
Tivoli® Storage Manager products.
Increased one-time
Hello,
I send You the information you asked me for resolving my
problem.
Thank you very much for your very important help
---
-) The machine is : RS/6000 SP IBM , composed from 3 "High
Node" Power 3.
2 with 16 processors 375 Mhz, 9 GB of ÚPhysical me
Hello from Austria,
we saw a 30% reduction and much better EXPIRE INVENTORY performance.
Size has increased by about 15% in 4 months and performance dropped a bit.
I've got the impression that a reorg run once a year will be OK for us.
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
Vorarlberger Illwerke AG
MAIL: [E
Thanks Sam and Bill for the answer.
Now I have Loaded my DB again.
Regards
Bo
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Sam Sheppard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 27. maj 2002 16:25
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Parm field length for for
Top of message -
I asked this before, but did not see an answer. I did a test
unload/load on my test server, and saw a 44% reduction in the database.
My selects ran with blazing speed, even on a much smaller box than the
production box. What I wanted to know, from people that have seen
significant reductions, ho
Hello all,
can somebody help me? I have problem with snmp, I cannot use defined own script
I can see some information with command:
# snmpinfo -v -md ibmAdsm
but command doesn't work:
# snmpinfo -v -ms ibmAdsmServerScript1.1="q_db_util"
noSuchName at position 0 - with result 255 return code
Sorry, code levels as below:
Server: TSM 4.2.0.0 on AIX 4.3.3
Client: TSM 4.2.0.0 on NT4
DB2:v7 fixpack 5
Qlogic FC catd is at firmware 1.61 and driver 8.00.08
On the client side there is nothing in the dsmerror.log other than
20-05-2002 22:33:11 sessRecvVerb: Error -72 from call t
Wolfgang,
The Estimated capacity of 3590 Cartridges depends on the following:
Are you using 3590J or 3590K cartridges (K has factor 2 more capacity)
Are you using B of E drives (128 or 256 tracks, E drives have also factor 2
more capacity)
Do you use compression (factor 3 more capacity if you don
Hello,
On Mon, 27 May 2002 06:52:49 +0200, Burak Demircan wrote:
>Hi,
>Last friday I created a large file enable journaled file system on AIX 4.3.3
>and put a
>10 gb single file on it. It was my backup disk pool volume. But I recieved
>following messages on
>TSM and AIX. Any idea?
>
>
>Actlong f
59 matches
Mail list logo
