Hi All
I am trying to expire all my data except the latest active version. My
backup copy group settings are as follows:-
Policy Domain Name WINDOWS
Policy Set Name ACTIVE
Mgmt Class Name WINDOWS
Copy Group Name STANDARD
Versions Data Exists 1
Versions Data Deleted 0
Retain Extra Versions 0
Retai
Thomas Denier wrote:
The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will "back
up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last
incremental backup stored at the server". This is somewhere between
ambiguous and incoherent. An incremental backup takes place over a
>Unix Clients (5.1.5.x): how do you determine when to use domain and
>when to use virtualmountpoint? Is one better than the other? Thanks.
The two are not mutually exclusive. A domain is a set of meta file collections
(volumes, file systems, etc.) defining your default incremental backup objects
Hope fully something simple . . .
Unix Clients (5.1.5.x): how do you determine when to use domain and
when to use virtualmountpoint? Is one better than the other? Thanks.
Mahesh
Is there any way to set operational priority of the client.
First thing to do, is elimiate the TSM client.
Pick a large file, at least 100MB, preferably 200-500MB.
FTP it from the client machine to a temp directory on the TSM server
machine.
Ignore the stats from the first run.
FTP it 4 or 5 more times, until you see some consistency in the results.
See i
I have an AIX client that is backing up very slow. It is an IBM J50
running an application called Softlab. It use to take
4 1/2 hours per night going to tape. When we put it on TSM for testing
it was doing 4 gb in about 4 hours. Which I said
was slow, compared to are other AIX boxes
Does anyone have scheme for Archive Data that the users need kept forever?
Ho do you move and track Data was Archive from a server that has been retired?
My thoughts are to have a server with dedicated drives for "Long" Term Archives.
The user would be told to create folder with a name containing
I have a Linux client running 2.4.20 kernel and Tivoli client 4.2.3.
This client is in an HA configuration and it seems that the Tivoli client
is taking up too much of the resources and the client shutsdonw.
Has anyone ever had experience with Tivoli backing up an HA configuration?
Jacque
"Unavailable" tells TSM not to use the tape, so reclamation skips right
over it. Verify the tapes are in your library, update them to read-only
(or read-write), and do the "move data" process as others have described.
I'd also not trust the tapes without verifying they can take data again - a
data
> set adsm-l nomail
Especially considering that the offering poster has already put the
presentation out on a website so people can download it.
Nick Cassimatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today is the tomorrow of yesterday.
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:12:56 -0700
"Kai Hintze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey guys, lighten up! And read what he said. Those of us forced to use
> poorly designed mailers might find it easier to have both addresses
> in the Reply-To field. Personally, I disagree, but I will do so
> politely. (
I get server names in the allocated-to field with tsm server 5.1.1.6.
David
My allocated-to field contains either the storage agent name or the tsm
server name when there is a tape mounted in the drive.
David
>12/19/02 04:43:43 ANS1228E Sending of object '/bla/bla/file' failed
>
>Every night the client complains about the same files.
>
>And now for the bizarre part: According to our
>customer these files have been removed from
>the client some time ago...
Hmmm... I wonder if the Sending error might b
>The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will "back
>up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last
>incremental backup stored at the server". This is somewhere between
>ambiguous and incoherent...
I encourage everyone finding problems in the manuals to e
Mine is blank also. I suspect that is used for if a drive is DEDICATED
to
a certain process, session or whatever.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/02 11:52AM >>>
That's interesting - what shows up in your "allocated-to" field? (Mine
has
nothing, even when tapes are mounted to processes a
On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 08:10, Alexander Verkooyen wrote:
> One of our customers tries to backup a
> file system on a Solaris 5.8 system
> using a 4.1.2.0 TSM client.
>
> Our server is 4.2.3.1 on AIX 4.3.3.0
>
> Every night the backup fails because
> the client is unable to backup hundreds
> of files
At the TSM server side setup up:
TECHOST and posssibly TECPORT depending on your environment. Both
set in dsmserv.opt. Issue the command q enabled tivoli on the TSM server to
display messages that are being forwarded to the TEC server. To add an event
issue the command ENABLE EVENTS TIVOLI x
I just downloaded the 4.2.3.2 patch for MVS. It does list the character
translation issue as being resolved.
I am going to put it up, shortly !
This going to put a major kink in my plans for the holiday break. I have
an AUDITDB planned.
Cinda Mullen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist S
Hi All ,
We want to be able to send events from TSM to Tivoli Event Console (TEC).
What is needed to send these events to TEC?
Thank You
SD
Have you run out space in the target.
The messages are consistent with that.
Robert Fijan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/19/2002 12:30:57 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE)
Subject: Problems with export nod
> That's interesting - what shows up in your "allocated-to"
> field? (Mine has nothing, even when tapes are mounted to
> processes and restores..)
Mine too. Probably just one of those "version" things again ;-)
By the way, I opened a PMR on the problem of nodes reporting 0.00MB backed
up and ot
Easy way to tell is to
show versions {node name} "SYSTEM OBJECT"
and look for excessive amounts of records that have **EXPIRE IMMEDIATELY**
(or some such, I don't recall the exact text) in them.
-Original Message-
From: Frost, Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19,
Thomas,
Thats a good question.
Since the main advantage of incrbydate is to avoid that tiresome list of active
objects being built,
then it would not make sense to pass individual dates for every active object.
You would think it safe to assume that it does not pass a date later than the
completio
At 11:52 AM 12/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
That's interesting - what shows up in your "allocated-to" field? (Mine has
nothing, even when tapes are mounted to processes and restores..)
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:39
That's interesting - what shows up in your "allocated-to" field? (Mine has
nothing, even when tapes are mounted to processes and restores..)
-Original Message-
From: David E Ehresman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 9:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SE
At 04:37 PM 12/19/02 +, Frost, Dave wrote:
Bruce,
I don't think so.
To tell, look at the occupancy object count for your sys-objects. I would
think that <= 20,000 for an average system is not unreasonable, but the
figure varies with the copygroup settings, whether active-directory is in
use
Bruce,
I don't think so.
To tell, look at the occupancy object count for your sys-objects. I would
think that <= 20,000 for an average system is not unreasonable, but the
figure varies with the copygroup settings, whether active-directory is in
use, etc.
We have had counts > 1.1 _million_ for s
UNSAt 11:19 AM 12/19/02 -0500, you wrote:
The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will "back
up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last
incremental backup stored at the server". This is somewhere between
ambiguous and incoherent. An incremental backup
The documentation for the incrbydate options states that it will "back
up new and changed files with a modification date later than the last
incremental backup stored at the server". This is somewhere between
ambiguous and incoherent. An incremental backup takes place over a time
interval, not at a
Another thought is that when they deleted the files the files were still
open so there is still some link to them. If you can unmount and remount
the filesystem the problem may go away.
Becky
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Verkooyen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December
John Naylor wrote:
>
> I have exactly the same issue with a couple of my clients (netware).
> The files no longer exist on the client, but I see many ANS1228E failure
> messages.
> However the backup completes successfully with the failures totalled in the
> Activity statistics.
> I would suggest
On the TSM Client, check for domain or inclexcl statements in dsm.sys,
dsm.opt or any inclexcl files. If the TSM Client has a defined Client
OptionSet on the TSM Server, also check there. The best way might be to
just do a 'dsmc show opt' and 'dsmc q inclexcl' on the client.
Also, check the cli
Hi,
Imre Csatlos wrote:
> Is yout client backing up the whole file system or just specific files?
> Like 'dsmc inc "/bla/bla/my*files.txt`
They are making a backup of the whole file system like 'dsmc i /bla'
> Also you can try umount and fsck for those file system, but I suspect the
> problem i
I have exactly the same issue with a couple of my clients (netware).
The files no longer exist on the client, but I see many ANS1228E failure
messages.
However the backup completes successfully with the failures totalled in the
Activity statistics.
I would suggest that you take it up with IBM, but
I'm running TSM 5.1.1.6 on AIX 4.3.3 ML10
My questions are:
1. Is systemobject problem fixed at this level?
2. If not how do tell when they start getting out of hand?
Here is the Q OCC for one of my 2000 nodes.
Node Name Type FilespaceFSID Storage Number of Physical
Logical
Cheers guys, I'll look into those posibilities :-)
/Christian
|-+--->
| | David E Ehresman|
| | |
| | Sent by: "ADSM: |
| | Dist Stor |
| | Manager"|
|
You're the man Paul.
This has helped me discover that it looks like upgrading the client is NOT
the answer. I've cut out the crap so you can see just the numbers. This is
from this morning, and as I see it, more than half of the nodes I've got are
not in this report. A very large number of those n
At 02:59 PM 12/18/02 -0700, you wrote:
Look here for more info:
http://www.tivoli.com/services/certification/roadmap/cert_51itsm.html
Test appears to be test# 000-772
Chris Murphy
IT Network Analyst
Idaho Dept. of Lands
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: William Rosette [mailt
Questions for you to ponder:
Are you restoring a TSM server, and then your Application server, or are your
restoring them both to the same box.
If item 1 is "one box", Do you already have the TSM server software sitting
dormant on the Application server.
Are you using DRM?
Have you already attempte
Hi,
Is yout client backing up the whole file system or just specific files?
Like 'dsmc inc "/bla/bla/my*files.txt`
Also you can try umount and fsck for those file system, but I suspect the
problem is somewhere in the
backup file specifications.
If all the other files are backed up apart from tho
select drive_name,drive_state,allocated_to,online from
drives
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/02 07:34AM >>>
Hi list,
Does anybody know of a SELECT statement that will show if any drives
are
available for use (not in use by another process or session)?
I need this for scripting purposes as I have
Theresa --
1) I don't know if this is your plan, but the best bet is to boot from CD,
select the maintenance mode shell, and select "install from system backup".
Then select your mksysb tape as the install device. This will 'clone' your
system, adding device drivers from the CD as required.
2) Sh
Hi all,
I have a rather bizarre problem.
One of our customers tries to backup a
file system on a Solaris 5.8 system
using a 4.1.2.0 TSM client.
Our server is 4.2.3.1 on AIX 4.3.3.0
Every night the backup fails because
the client is unable to backup hundreds
of files. The log file is filled with
If you are just needing to know if reclamation is running, you might just
look at the adsm.processes table...
tsm: TSMSRV02>select * from processes
PROCESS_NUM: 2193
PROCESS: Space Reclamation
START_TIME: 2002-12-19 07:31:00.00
FILES_PROCESSED: 5831
BYTES_PROCESSED: 479807582
Hey,
Can someone point me to client trace options? I've seen the tech guide improvements
section
but can't find the guide to using the trace options.
Jacque
Hi Robert,
I had similar problems because I tried to write the virtual volumes
directly to sequential media. Is your first storagepool on your target
server a diskpool? If not, you should reconfigure the archive copy group
for source server's node to write on disk first.
Bye,
Wolfgang
-Or
We have not been able to locate the ptf that was referenced earlier. We
are tracking for it and can only hope it will be available soon.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/19/02 07:01AM >>>
Hi all,
We where facing the same problem (on AIX 4.3.3), and installed ML
4.3.2.1 which was supposed to solve it : n
Hi all,
We where facing the same problem (on AIX 4.3.3), and installed ML
4.3.2.1 which was supposed to solve it : no luck, it still mangles
everything containing special characters. Did anyone succeed in
correcting this problem, and case of a positive answer, with wich ML or
PTF ?
Thanks in advan
Hi list,
Does anybody know of a SELECT statement that will show if any drives are
available for use (not in use by another process or session)?
I need this for scripting purposes as I have only two drives in my library,
and while doing reclamation both drives are in use.
Kind regards,
Christia
Hi there.
we are migrating from MVS to WIN2K and try to take all the data with us.
so I made up a server2server - connection between the two systems and try to
export data into a diskpool, migrating to tape when necessary.
Some of the exports go well, but now i received the following error:
1
If you create separate subnet/VLAN for backups it is just a matter of
setting the address in dsm.sys.
example:
let say your primary network is 192.168.11.0, TSM server is 192.168.1.3
and TSM client node is 192.168.11.20
let new "backups" VLAN is 172.17.2.0, server is 172.17.2.3 and node is
172.17.
use 'tcpclientaddress ipaddress' in client option file ( windows
:dsm.opt; unix:dsm.sys ). The schedmode should prompted in this case.
Regards
Raghu.
Michelle Wiedeman
cc:
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Subject:
Nope,
well, TSM uses standard routing (from the client back to the TSM
server)
The TSM server uses standard routing to reach the client AS SPECIFIED IN THE
TCPCLIENTADDRESS for scheduled events and the packet return address for
non-scheduled activity.
So just set a route on the client that
Hi,
There is a 64bit TDP for Oracle on Solaris , so I gues you can do that. (At
least on a Solaris box)
Imre Csatlos
-Original Message-
From: Tectrade Computers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 2002. december 19. 10:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 64 Bit Oracle TDP
Hi
Could anyone
hi all,
server adsm 3.1 on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10
client tsm4.1 on AIX 4.3.3 ML 10
This client has been having problems with its network. every night during
the backup the costumers cannot access their databases because the network
card cant handle the load.
Now The idea is to use a second networkcard
Hi
Could anyone tell me if it is possible to perform an incremental backup on
the a 64 bit oracle database?
Regards
Alex
Hi Werner,
I'm sorry about a minor error on my side. I said (believed) that move
nodedata had parameters to move only active files, but the possibilities for
reducing the data to be moved are limited to
type=ANY|Backup|ARchive|SPacemanaged. In your case Werner, that doesn't help
alot. My mistake.
I
This was what I finally provided to the person asking the question.
Try this as a define script input through the browser.
select summary.entity as ""NODE NAME"", nodes.domain_name as ""DOMAIN"",
nodes.platform_name as ""PLATFORM"", cast((cast(sum(summary.bytes) as float)
/ 1024 / 1024) as decima
61 matches
Mail list logo
