Hi Dave,
If both servers are using the same kind of tapes, you could use export node - import
node procedure ! Another possible way doing this would be using server to server
communication, but that implies lots of work just for restoring a node ...
My 2 cents !
Cheers.
Arnaud
I have the same problem too. It started this morning.
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 07 February 2003 06:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple Emails from this group
Strange, not me.
Geoff Gill
TSM Administrator
NT Systems
I have received about 6 blank emails so far all addressed the same. Anyone
know why??
Thanks,
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Jeff G Kloek [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Jose,
The redbook is dated 14.12.2000 and I cannot recall when 6228 went out. It
either was brand new or was not available. Thus was not cited in the
redbook.
But you are absolutely correct - it applies to both 6227 and 6228 adapters
(in fact last installations I make are on 6228's :-).
Zlatko
Hi,
I have a problem restoring from one SQLServer 7.0 to another SQLServer 2000.
I get this error: Message ACO5060E A Tivoli Storage Manager API error has
occurred.
TDP SQL Agent is 2.2.1 on both machines, TSMServer OS390/5.1.5.0
Regards David
I would get the solaris people to check and really make sure the adapater is
really not on autonegotiate.
-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday 6 February 2003 00:05
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Sun Solaris server backups not ending
Hi everybody!
One short question for those who are experienced with Sun Solaris-Systems
and FibreChannel addressing.
Can anybody tell me how can I access the FibreDrives in an 3584 Library?
The following things we have done until now:
- we enabled persistent bindung in 'lpfc.conf' (as you can
Maybe I'm wrong but accounting records are for server resources that are
used during a session (Admin Giude - chapter19 - Monitoring TSM Accounting
Records). So, if the client is using more than one backup session on the
server (resourseutilization2), you will have more than one record in the
Agreed, but it's a bit silly to backup 200 gbyte of historical database
every day. When a incremental backup in RMAN might send 10 Mbyte per day.
Extreme example yes, But I think RMAN is really worth the effort.
-Original Message-
From: Stef Coene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Hoi
Can someone help me with this.
TSM Server 4.2.2.12
Sun Solaris 8 (E450)
BA Client 4.2.1.0
Connect thru Fast ethernet.
Sometimes time the backup takes hours to complete.
Yesterday
Tivoli Storage Manager
Version 4, Release 2, Level 1.0
Hi list,
Could any SQL genius explain me wat is wrong with this statement :
select sum(physical_mb) from occupancy where stgpool_name='TAPELTO1_WIN' - (select
sum(physical_mb) from occupancy where stgpool_name='COPYLTO1_WIN' )
When trying to use it II get following output :
ANR2916E The SQL
Hi all,
since installing the 4.2.3.2 level (after 4.1.4) on my AIX-server (AIX
4.3.3) I have the problem that in the summary-table the field BYTES for a
backup-session of NT and W2K-clients is filled with 0 even though the
client has transfered GigaBytes of data. Restore-sessions of the same
On Friday, Feb 7, 2003, at 20:37 Australia/Sydney, Rodney clark wrote:
Agreed, but it's a bit silly to backup 200 gbyte of historical database
every day. When a incremental backup in RMAN might send 10 Mbyte per
day.
Extreme example yes, But I think RMAN is really worth the effort.
So why not
Dave
You could also use backupsets. which can be defined in and are then available to
the new system
If you have a test system you could try restoring the database from the old
system, so your test system knows about the backup tapes, then restore to your
new client, and your new client can then
Do you use netview event logging for good and useful purposes
If you do then say to the auditors that you can do what they ask, if they can
provide an alternative
mechanism for doing your good and useful purposes.
If you do not use it then your os390 sysprog can remove the anr messages from
your
I've got a lot more than 6!!
Martha-- are you still the list owner I hope you still are.
Would you see if there is a problem somewhere?
thanks
lisa
Jason Stoessler
Jason.Stoessler@KINGSW To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What is EndTxn Verb? It takes 50% of the clients time.
- it indicates the end-transaction verb time on the server.that is
the time it takes to close the transaction.the fact that in the trace Data
Verb is high as well points to a problem on the server.
Cache Hit Pct.: 98.25
we'd like to
Yes, please do. I have literally hundreds. They come in continually.
Thanks!!
Lisa Cabanas
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Sent by: ADSM: Subject:
From: Christoph Pilgram
since installing the 4.2.3.2 level (after 4.1.4) on my AIX-server (AIX
4.3.3) I have the problem that in the summary-table the field
BYTES for a backup-session of NT and W2K-clients is filled
with 0 even though the client has transfered GigaBytes of
data.
There are several ways of changing the default settings and force
full-duplex mode; you may need to alter your switch settings as well.
Setting through /etc/system
set hme:hme_adv_autoneg_cap=0 set hme:hme_adv_100hdx_cap=0 set
hme:hme_adv_100fdx_cap=1
Setting with ndd
ndd -set /dev/hme
I also got nine completely empty (except complains added by my mail
server). No headers, empty body, empty subject (actually missing as all
other headers).
People with Re:-only at least got something :-)
Zlatko Krastev
IT Consultant
Jason Stoessler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: ADSM: Dist Stor
i've gotten about 10 or so emails with the same complaintsonly the
senders names where different ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple Emails from this group
I
At 4:20 PM -0600 2/6/03, Julian Armendariz wrote:
You will have to specify which copypool to get the files from.
restore v 000345 copy=name_of_copypool p=y
According to the manual, copypool is optional, and if not specified, files
are restored from any copy pool in which copies can be located.
Does any TSM gurus have any suggestions for our AIX admin
Thank You,
Bill Rosette
Data Center/IS/Papa Johns International
WWJD
- Forwarded by Bill Rosette/IS/Corporate/Papa Johns on 02/07/2003 09:20
AM -
Steven Schraer
Hi Mark,
The problem occurs when I try to connect to the server, even before
it knows which version of database to restore from.
Thanks,
David
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Stapleton, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 7. februar 2003 14:51
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: MSG.
We use to use journaled mirrored file systems, but found that Raw Mirrored local
provides us better I/O, now we are using Raw volumes on EMC Disk for stgpools which
works even better because the disk is mirrored on the back end of the EMC Symetrix.
-Original Message-
From: William
Haven't you got this one:
Your subscription to the ADSM-L list (ADSM: Dist Stor Manager) has been
accepted.
...
many lines of description of list features and functions
...
More information on LISTSERV commands can be found in the LISTSERV
reference card, which you can retrieve by
Clarificationthe ADSM system on which these backup tapes were created
no longer exists. Databases are gone. Server is gone.
All's that's left are the tapes.
So..now...is this still possible using your suggestions???
Dave Myers
Denver Solutions Group
Senior Systems Engineer
Office Phone:
Hi bill,
What people tend to forget is that y=the data in your diskpool is actual
data comming from your clients, your data is therefore not really lost.It
is possible to make an administrative schedule which starts after all
backups have finished, which backes up your diskpool before it starts
From Steven Schraer:
It looks like for storage pools are recommend for raid 0
(mirroring), raid
0+1 (mirroring stripping) or raid 5 (distributed parity).
These are 0+safe
methods to protect the storage pool. Do you know of any
companies that use just raid 1 (stripping) on their storage
From: Dave Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Clarificationthe ADSM system on which these backup tapes
were created
no longer exists. Databases are gone. Server is gone.
All's that's left are the tapes.
So..now...is this still possible using your suggestions???
Without the database
Recently I upgraded to TDP SQL 5.1 on a SQL server. Once I figured out the
command line differences to get the command file to work they seemed to run
fine. Two days ago I started receiving a failure notification on the
backups, which looks like one of the databases is corrupt.
This particular
Have in mind you will need IBM driver for IBM drives (when they become
available for STK) and TSM driver update for HP/Seagate. Thus you have to
wait either support with IBM drives or new ITSM maintenance supporting
HP/Seagate LTO-2 drives. The answer whichever is earlier is not good
because you
Hi gurus!
I found a lot of queries in the archive regarding if Oracle 9.2 is
supported on TDPO 2.2.1 but no replies. Does any know if this is supported?
I need Data Protection for Oracle 9.2 running on HP-UX. Refering to the
configuration instructions for TDP 2.2.1 the RMAN relinking porcedure
Clarificationthe ADSM system on which these backup tapes
were created
no longer exists. Databases are gone. Server is gone.
All's that's left are the tapes.
So..now...is this still possible using your suggestions???
Without the database or the original system, what you've got is a
There is an upgrade from 2.2.1 tdp which is tdp 5.1.5.
Here are the software requirements for tdp for oracle 5.1.5.
Looks like aix 5.1 is needed but 9.2 oracle is supported.
==
Software Requirements
-
Data Protection for Oracle Version 5
Hi list,
I have a TSM Server running on a W2K Server machine. The tape library is a IBM 3590,
non automated, with two drives. The drives are connected to the TSM Server through
SCSI interfaces (one interface for each drive).
What I need is this: I want to do each incremental backup on three
Orin,
I see that there are many subscribers willing to help you with whatever
you situation is with Data Protection for Oracle. Can you please be more
specific (I'm asking for it, huh?) about the complexities being faced? I
must assume, because you mention TSM for Oracle, that your troubles stem
Hi All,
I have an annoying problem
Hopefully the Doc will be able to fix me up
Seriously, I need to make a particular drive in a WINNT client use large
capacity tapes for its backups
I have a management class LARGE which does this and works for other clients in
this domain
For this particular
I've been putting stuff in the body and not the subject. This list server
always responds back that I am not doing it that way. I wonder if this
list has a problem with my Lotus Notes R6 client. Other lists I belong to
don't seem to have this issue. My work around is to send my problems to
Hi *SM-ers,
we want to do the above mentioned migration.
Mig-1: 4.2.1.8 -- 5.1.0.0 -- 5.1.6.0 -- 5.1.6.1
Mig-2 4.2.1.8 -- 5.1.5.0 -- 5.1.6.0 -- 5.1.6.1
Q: Which one would You prefer ?
--
MfG / Ciao - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Peter Dümpert
From: Mario Behring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I have a TSM Server running on a W2K Server machine. The tape
library is a IBM 3590, non automated, with two drives. The
drives are connected to the TSM Server through SCSI
interfaces (one interface for each drive).
What I need is this: I
I'll assume you did have backslashes when you used them in the
include/exclude statement and not the slashes you have in your note...
I've found that when in doubt, ask TSM what it expects...
Try doing a q file boxwa009 and take its specification for D: and use
it...
probably
Yes you can do this, but if you have a number of tapes that make up the
backupset you need to know the order that they were written in, so you can
define them in the same sequence in the volume names parameter.
If you have the web gui its quite straightforward to define the backupset to
your new
Hi All,
we want to backup oracle transaction logs every hour /everyday of the
week .Currently the model of backing up everything once a day permits
losing an entire days worth of data which isn't necessary.
Any ideas on how I can schedule this job in TSM ?
Thank You
Shekhar Dhotre.
Thanks Martha-- good luck on the servers!
We can put up with it-- it's nice to know you are already on top of it!
lisa
Martha
McConaghyTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:
RIST.EDU
Is ot possible to skip the 5.1.6.0 and go 4.2.1.8 -- 5.1.5.0 -- then 5.1.6.1 being
that 5.6.0 is suppose to be buggy.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Duempert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 9:55 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: From TIVsm 4.2.1.8 to TIVsm
Bill,
The real question is, what is your client data profile? While I don't
think I'd mirror a stgpool used solely for filesystem backups, I myself
would be inclined to mirror a stgpool that contains live data such as
archived txn logs from DB2 which then get reused or fileserver cleanup
ADSM server v 3.1, on AIX 4.3.3 system. IBM 3575 L18 tape library. Yes, we
plan to upgrade soon. But right now I'm in a jam:
1) Our backup server is set to hold 1 copy of a modified file for 7 days.
2) Our backup server is backing up home directories on unix disks. We want
to change the group
As a side note to one of the subsribers questions: TDP Oracle 2.2.1
supports Oracle 9i. The only exception is for Oracle 9.2 on AIX 5 64bit,
you will need to download the Data Protection for Oracle 5.1.5 ptf from
IBM ftp site for support on this platform.
IS following configuration supported ?
FWIW--
the complexity isn't due to the TSM side-- its the RMAN scripts as far as I
am concerned. If you are already administering a TSM server-- THAT'S the
difficult part!
And, when trying to diagnose a problem, Tivoli is WAY more helpful than
Oracle or SQL-BackTrak has been in the past too.
Hi TSMers
Has anyone had any challenges with TSM 5.1.5 on a client running Netware 6?
thanks,
Tommy Templeton
Senior System Administrator
DFA-MMRS
601-359-3106
e-mail - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How about:
What does QUERY INCLEXCL show?
Also, you don't indicate why you think this is a problem; are you finding
that the d: files are not being bound to the LARGE management class? Or
are you just basing this on what you see in QUERY INCLEXCL?
Regards,
Andy
Andy Raibeck
IBM Software Group
Shekhar,
My hourly log schedule looks like this:
Policy Domain Name: BWCSQL
Schedule Name: LOGHOUR
Description:
Action: Command
Options:
Objects: c:\SQLLOG.CMD
Yes Andy this is a real problem, the files backup but they go to the default
pool
which is collocated by node not filespace.
The query inclexcl reproduces the option file including the line I have
highlighted
Unfortunately I cannot send a screen print at the moment because the client
admin is not
Hi John,
dsmc q inclexcl will only show the incude exclude parameters, not mgmt
class parameter. You can see if file is bound to the mgmt class using the
GUI, in the backup view, right-click the mouse on the file. To see if it is
backed up bound to this mgmt class, use the restore view. Remember
Dwight,
They read as backslahes when i send them
probably \\boxwa009\d$ so try \\boxwa009\d$\...\*
is a good thought, but I looked at the filespace for this box
which shows \\boxwa009\d$
and a similar box that works and that shows \\boxwz001\g$
so no real difference.
thanks,
John
Cook,
As I understand the reply from Neil Rasmussen, Oracle 9.2.x is supported at
TDPO 2.2.1 with exeption for AIX 5 64bit where you need the (TDP) 5.1.5.
I beleve Neil is answering my question earlier today where I was asking if
TDPO 2.2.1 where supported for Oracle 9.2 on HP-UX (11i). So I will try
You need to isolate the data for that server/filespace in the copypool in
order to delete ONLY that data. I've used this brute force method before:
Turn colocation on for the copypool at client/filespace level as needed.
find copypool volumes containing data for the client using: select
Kolbeinn,
Thats very interesting about the management class not showing in the query
inclexcl.
That threw me off the scent, and here I hang my head in shame.
I did not do the standard thing which I always normally do, and thats check to
see whether the management class is being used in the
try this:
select sum(physical_mb)-(select sum(physical_mb) from occupancy where
stgpool_name='COPYLTO1_WIN') from occupancy where stgpool_name
='TAPELTO1_WIN'
PAC Brion Arnaud
Arnaud.Brion@PAN To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As I understand the reply from Neil Rasmussen, Oracle 9.2.x is supported
at
TDPO 2.2.1 with exeption for AIX 5 64bit where you need the (TDP) 5.1.5.
Not true :
Tivoli Data Protection for
Oracle for UNIX
Installation and User's Guide
Version 2 Release 2.1
Preface
Tivoli Data Protection for
From: Alexander Lazarevich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
3) If we change a group id of a file, then the server backs
up this modified file as a modifed copy, thus having 2
copies of the file on tape, one copy owned by each group.
4) Is there any way to turn off this function so that a
I think it is because Oracle 9.0.1 was probably the highest level at the
time when the installation and user guide was published.
Following is taken from the IBM website
http://www-1.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=666context=SSTFZRq=oracleuid=swg21066380:
Data Protection for Oracle Ver 2.2.1 on
[lobbing armor piercing verbage]
Oh ye of narrow vision and holder of golden horseshoe of hardware luck:
1. Have you ever lost a stg pool disk? And before you answer well ya
just backup again
2. SOME DATA IS IMPOSSIBLE TO BACKUP AGAIN!
3. I REPEAT!
Along with regular clients, I backup data
Hi,
I'm no DB admin but I think you can configure ORACLE in a way
that for every new archive log a backup of this log is started.
If you send this logs to a disk storagepool your backup will be
as close to 'real live' as possible.
Kind regards
Thomas Rupp
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von:
I forgot your case, AIX 4.3.3:
From the IBM web, TDPO 2.2.1 supports Oracle 9i 9.0.1 or later (64-bit)
for AIX 4.3.3 - if I understand right:
Data Protection for Oracle Ver 2.2.1 on AIX
Hardware requirements: RS/6000 or pSeries with 96 MB RAM and 6 MB Disk
space.
Software requirements:
* AIX
And ya know... this is why I just LOVE TSM !
you can do anything you want...
take one drawer of SSA and set it up as JBOD and put it all as a storage
pool for non-critical backups/archives
take another drawer of SSA and set it up in a raid of your choice for more
critical backups/archives
As far as Log sizing, I think the only log size that makes any sense is
exactly 12gb. Why make it smaller, when disks are so cheap? And you
cannot make it larger, because as you say, you've got to leave yourself
someplace to go when it fills up.
However, what you are doing with archive-delete
Now that you guys mentioned this yesterday I also received eight or nine
completely empty emails (???!!).
Mario Behring
Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I also got nine completely empty
(except complains added by my mail
server). No headers, empty body, empty subject (actually
I believe this is more than a server issue. I have been assured it is fixed
in 5.1.1.2 and higher, but I have not installed it yet. Apparently, the
client needs to be updated as well to get a complete fix. I do not know if
there is a client level for 4.2.3.2 and higher that completely
We currently run a 4.2.3.2 TSM server under an OS/390 system that also
supports several other applications. The system is running out of
resources, and we are looking at a number of options for upgrading it
or moving part of its workload elsewhere. One of these options is
moving the TSM server to
At 3:19 PM -0500 2/7/03, Seay, Paul wrote:
Apparently, the
client needs to be updated as well to get a complete fix. I do not know if
there is a client level for 4.2.3.2 and higher that completely eliminates
the problem.
According to the info I got from TSM support, for what I think is the
We run a 4.2.3.2 TSM server under OS/390. We have about 110 active client
systems, sending about 300,000 files and about 70 gigabytes to the server
each night. Our best estimate is that this workload will double in the
next two years. Is it reasonable to stay with an OS/390 or zOS server in
the
Hi list-
Due to some restructuring, I need to export node 'x' from TSM server 'k'
and then import it to TSM server 'c'.
I want to use virtual vols.
I set up the server-server comm stuff, devc, and client nodes as needed.
I ran the export node 'x' on server 'k' specifying a devc that points to
And now a boatload of e-mail about blank e-mails. ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Mario Behring [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 12:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Multiple Emails from this group
Now that you guys mentioned this yesterday I also
It's stuff like this that makes my shake my head in disbelief...
The summary table was working fine will ALL my clients, regardless of
version, when the server was 4.1.5. After upgrading ONLY the server to
5.1.5. the byte counts in the summary table are Zeroes.
Hmmm, compatability tested? I
This will depend on the size of your mainframe, we run on OS/390, we have 6 systems
running 9 LPARS, plus some extra LPARS for other workload. We have 15 instances of
TSM running on various systems and run up to 8 of these on one LPAR at any time. If
you want the exact size of our systems and
Been there, just done this.
First all, if you are at 5.1.5, I was told by someone that you could export
DIRECTLY to another server, without having to do the bogus export-
then-import thing. I would look into that, as it should be easier to
implement than what you are doing.
Second, I have had
TSM as you know works well on the mainframe. VM was the original WDSF
platform. But with the I/O and processing power of UNIX systems
surpassing mainframes, moving off the mainframe TSM off the mainframe
isn't a bad idea especially since you are expanding your service.
--
Joshua S. Bassi
IBM
We recently migrated to Netware 6 our only server running netware. We've not
been able to backup that server for about a week now. I tried to reinstall
the 5.1.5 .0 B/A client again and I am still getting these errors:
02/07/03 16:04:30 ANRD smnode.c(6243): ThreadId27 Error receiving
I don't have the messages manual this error referrs to. Could someone help
me out? Do I have a problem with the drive or with the tape?
It came from my activity log, and I am getting a lot of them.
Thanks in advance ... Jack
02/07/2003 16:23:11 ANR8302E I/O error on drive TAPE3 (MT3.0.0.3)
On a MacOS X 10.2.3 system I'm getting crash logs from something
called 'fix_prebinding' when running the TSM 5.1 client. TSM
continues to run, and does successful backups, as far as I can tell;
the crashes appear to occur on input actions (keypresses, mouse
clicks). I didn't get such crashes when
Jack,
Sense data 03-14-00 means recorded entity not found. Since 03 is media
error, this could be a cartridge problem.
Regards,
HK..
Coats, Jack
Jack.Coats@BANKSTTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ERLING.COM
Top of message
-- 02-07-03 15:11 S.SHEPPARD (SHS)Future of mainframe TSM
We run 2 older 9672s (R52 and R14), with a TSM 4.2.3.2 system on each
backing up 140-160GB a night from 200+ clients. This is with an RVA
T82 and 3590B
Hello,
this sounds like you are having problem with TDP, not SQL Sever. If this is true why
would you want to restore the SQL Server Db?
Yi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07/03 10:00AM
Recently I upgraded to TDP SQL 5.1 on a SQL server. Once I figured out the
command line differences to get the
Hello, Thomas.
We run a 4.2.3.2 TSM under OS/390 2.10, also. We run it on a tiny little
7060-H50 (Multiprise 3000) and have an approximately 110mb/sec network
connection (that's a bandwidth measurement - not a theoretical number).
Furthermore, we run our OS/390 in a V=R virtual machine under
The definition of compatibility may not mean that no features get broken
that are not directly related to the integrity of the system from a Tivoli
point of view. Unfortunately, this stuff has been broken since about
4.2.1.11. And for the most part, the summary table contents are not
necessary
TSM Advance:
I have a I/O Error with LTO 3581 on AIX 4.3.3 (TSM 4.2.2.13).
The error message as follow:
ANR8300E I/O error on library LTO3581 (OP=6C03, CC=-1,
KEY=09, ASC=FF, ASCQ=3B,
SENSE=70.00.09.00.00.00.00.0A.-
00.00.00.00.FF.3B.00.00.00.00.,
On Saturday, Feb 8, 2003, at 09:24 Australia/Sydney, Stan Kerr wrote:
On a MacOS X 10.2.3 system I'm getting crash logs from something
called 'fix_prebinding' when running the TSM 5.1 client. TSM
continues to run, and does successful backups, as far as I can tell;
the crashes appear to occur on
In V5.1 and up you can specify linked copy pools and actually create the
primary and the copy pools at the same time, but you have to have 3 tape
drives.
Paul D. Seay, Jr.
Technical Specialist
Northrop Grumman Information Technology
757-688-8180
-Original Message-
From: Stapleton, Mark
Hello,
To simplify my question,
assume that there are two tape cartridges with same bar codes.
The tapes are extended high performance tapes.
We have two IBM 3494 tape libraries( I call them as 3494A, 3494B).
If I put one tape into 3494A and if I put the other tape into 3494B,
will that
92 matches
Mail list logo
