Alright, time to ask the experts!
Essentially, I'm trying to have our remote TSM servers (satellite
locations) utilize the main TSM server as the next storage pool in it's
hierarchy.
The hierarchy will eventually look like this:
Remote Server (RS) Disk Cache
-Main Server (MS) Disk Cache
-
--> This list of tapes is used by the operators to go and fetch the tapes to
be brought onsite.
I cannot figure it out! For what a reason you prefer to add more risk to
your offsite copies by bringing them onsite? Before new copies reach the
vault you are having *no* offsite copies (or your copies
I'm trying to run some select statements and get a summary of the bytes
transferred during a backup.
No matter what I use, the bytes transferred always = 0. In the msi GUI
it all looks good, but the dsmadmc select queries come up w/ 0.
Is this a known problem or am I doing something wrong? Why d
Hi Zlatko,
If I plug into your formula, I get ...
1492.648 0.81294 14396.6095.29128
(clearly under utilized).
But (ADSM V3.1(ancient)) shows ...
Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used Pct
Max.
Space Capacity Extension Reduction
>There are no errors showing in the logs for any of
>the tapes. Sometimes when I come in in the morning reclamation is
still
>running on the offsite pool
This sounds like you are setting the reclaim level too low. Start by
setting it higher, e.g. 90. If reclaim is able to process that in your
ti
Try running you reclamation at say 90% and see if that doesn't
free a bunch up. You may have so many that it is trying to reclaim
say 100 tapes ansd will take forever as more tapes are added each day.
Try 90% for a couple of days.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fi
Hi,
First off, let me say that this a wonderfully explained set of formulas and
analysis.
Isn't this getting a little off the mark though? Last I checked, almost
every database on the planet (yes even pervasive sql) when allocating
pages/extents, left an amount of space unutilized at the end. I
>I have used the MOVE DATA without any problems. Usually it is
>because of a percieved problem with the offsite tape. But it should work
>for what you want to do.
>WHy doesn't Reclaimation get this done for you?
>Matt
That is a good question. There are no errors showing in the lo
* ATTENTION *
Those who do not like the mathematics, skip to the end (search for word
"select").
*
>From my mathematical background this query is not showing very good
results. The formula looks like
( MAX_REDUCTION_MB * 256 )
100 - -
Gill,
I have used the MOVE DATA without any problems. Usually it is
because of a percieved problem with the offsite tape. But it should work
for what you want to do.
WHy doesn't Reclaimation get this done for you?
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[E
SONY SAIT drives will be supported in TSM 5.2.2 which is scheduled to be
released end of this year.
Himanshu Madhani
Tivoli Storage Manager Development
David,
The underlying backup code is identical for the command-line
and GUI for Data Protection for Exchange.
I agree something doesn't sound right. I would take a closer
look at the logs for both Data Protection for Exchange and
the TSM Server to make sure the same data and same amount
of data w
Mine came back as 0.02 does that mean it is not very fragmented? Our
database is 112GB, 78.8% used, was "new" in October 2001 and has never been
reorganized.
Robin Sharpe
Berlex Labs
|-+--->
| | "Prather, Wanda"|
| | <[EMAI
Have any of you used the move data command to try and consolidate data from
filling tapes that have been sent offsite to tapes within the library that
will be sent offsite? At the moment we have over 180 tapes in filling status
offsite, anywhere from 0.1% to 100% filling. I'd like to at least see i
Dave,
I have just completed moving 300 desktops and servers from 1 TSM
server to another. I do not know how many clients you are dealing with but
the things I can tell you are...
1) the TCPSERVERADDRESS and the TCPPORT on the clients DSM.OPT dictate where
they are backed up to, not the TSM
We are running Exchange 5.5 on a box running Win2k Sp2, 1.1 GHz
x2 with 2.6 gig ram, TSM version 5.1.5.2, and TDP version 5.1.5.0. It's
talking a TSM server running 5.1.6.
The backups are normally ran via a batch file using the command
line program with the switches we wan
That query (taken here from ADSM.QuickFacts) confuses me entirely - can
someone please explain?
SELECT CAST((100 - ( CAST(MAX_REDUCTION_MB AS FLOAT) * 256 ) /
(CAST(USABLE_PAGES AS FLOAT) -
CAST(USED_PAGES AS FLOAT) ) * 100)
AS
Help Please
I am in the market for a new tape library. I have been watching the developments with
Sony's SAIT technology. Not many libraries on the market yet but I have managed to
find a few. So, will TSM support SAIT, and if so what is the timeline?
Thanks
Dean Winger
Network Administrator
I would take the last option anyday.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Export server
We are planning to reinstall our Windows 2000-based TSM server with Linux.
We only use DASD for storage.
Howdy, all.
I've only been around TSM since ADSM 2.1; I recall hearing bits and pieces of
the earlier versions and the roots of the product.
Could someone who was there synopsize, and perhaps someone who FAQs capture
it?
I rooted around in the archives and Mr. Sims' fine quickfacts, but didn't s
John Naylor wrote, in part:
OK I ran Remco's sql and it reports my database is 53% fragmented.
Maybe this makes you feel better? My result is 99.80, but then my
database isn't what it used to be :-)cheers, wayne
It's a two-way procedure:
MOVE DRMEDIA WHERESTATE=VAULT TOSTATE=COURIERRETRIEVE
MOVE DRMEDIA WHERESTATE=COURIERRETRIEVE TOSTATE=VAULTRETRIEVE
Met vriendelijke groet, with kind regards,
Richard van Denzel
Consultant
IBM CATE, TSM Certified Consultant
Is there anyway to manually set a volume from vault to vaultretrieve?
If not, how does one recall offsite volumes in a vault state? I have a
problem
with my expiration, and I'm running VERY low on scratches. So I'm trying to
retrieve some of my offsite tapes. And since expiration isn't automatic
OK I ran Remco's sql and it reports my database is 53% fragmented.
I know that a fragmented database is the natural state, but is there any
level of fragmentation that you should start to get worried at ?
Not being a database expert I would say only worry if TSM cache hits start
slipping badly,
bu
Hi Guys!
The SQL statement can also be found at Richard's quickfacts page:
http://people.bu.edu/rbs/ADSM.QuickFacts
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Remco Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 12:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECT
On Sat, 18 Oct 2003 14:35:09 -0400
"Talafous, John G." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Remco,
> Would you be willing to share your SQL query that reports on DB
> fragmentation?
>
I was allready looking at Eric (he probably saved my thingy somewhere
usefull, I just saved it in my sent-mail folder)
hello,
environment:
windows nt 4.0
tsm server 4.2.x
tsm client 4.2.x
tsm san manager 4.2.x
lto 3584, 4 drives
i need some help upgrading nt4 .0 san agent to w2k.
the problem is, that the registry parameter maximumsglist is false (too
small), but under nt4.0 everything (also restore)
is working
27 matches
Mail list logo
