I just installed a 5.2.2.0/5.2.2.2 system on a Linux server and it
apparently came up with all of these 50 trial license seats. I tried
activating my real entitlements and it seems to ignore me and continues to
have all of those trial licenses still active. The register license
command seems to h
Why not just use the MOVE MEDIA command? Or you could shell out a couple
bucks for AutoVault which will allow you to manage primary storage pool
volumes to/from the offsite vault.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
La
Is there a Red Book or other doc for doing a bare metal restore of an
AIX box using TSM for SYSBACK?
No fooling. (I knew someone would catch this.)
--
Mark Stapleton
-Original Message-
From: David Longo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: The missing FAQ
No Fooling?
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 11:48AM >>>
Hi, I am afraid this is wrong.
I do not now any way how to store/restore security information only apart
from using special tools.
The one I used to use can be found on www.lanicu.com and could help you,
if it is worth for you to invest couple of hours (download, read manual,
install, test, use).
Arent getting any errors, other than from shutting the box off !
"Wilcox, Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/05/2004 10:50 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Can't define IBM3
We have an STK L700e library with IBM Ultrium2 drives. TSM is running on AIX
5.1 using IBM HBA cards. L700e is in the SAN.
We are getting entries in out AIX error report daily, sometimes hourly on
lb0 (robot). STK says it's IBM and IBM says it's STK. I can't find any
errors in TSM and the HBAs chec
No Fooling?
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/05/04 11:48AM >>>
I have to apologize to you folks; I've missed posting the TSM FAQ this
month.
This is not due to indifference; it's mostly due to my desire to give it
a facelift and not having found the time to do it.
The TSM monthly FAQ will b
I have to apologize to you folks; I've missed posting the TSM FAQ this
month.
This is not due to indifference; it's mostly due to my desire to give it
a facelift and not having found the time to do it.
The TSM monthly FAQ will be back on April 1.
--
Mark Stapleton
Maybe on obvious point but are you ettin useful entries in the AIX error
log?
Many thanks
Andy Wilcox
UNIX Systems Administrator
Aquila Networks
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 March 2004 14:30
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can't de
Zoltan,
are you also the AIX admin ? per what your are stating in yr emails that
you have performed all the TSM steps by the "book", then there is something
from the library interface to AIX that is not allowing TSM to properly
handshake and access /dev/smc0... does AIX has all the latest ptfs (scs
Guess it would depend on your server and tape library environment:
/home/root/bin/dsmcmd \
"select volume_name from volumes where stgpol_name="STGPOOL1' AND NOT
access='OFFSITE' " > SQLLIST
grep "^[000]" SQLTEST > VOLLIST
Offsitevols < VOLLIST
Offsitevo
You're opening a big can of worms doing it with only 1 drive. That and you
need to deal with the fact that tape reclamation is a pain in the butt to deal
with tapes that aren't left in the library. Are you planning on taking just
the exchange data out of the library, or both the exchange data *a
Thank you and Richard for showing me the way.
However, this is a still royal pain !
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/05/2004
09:59:28 AM:
> Zoltan,
>
> This is a known problem.
> Go to:
>www.ibm.com
> Search for:
>ACO0004E
>
> You will see a KB article about how
Patrick,
> Is there anyone using LTO2 drives with LTO1 tapes?
Yes - we've been using it to migrate from LTO1 -> LTO2. No problems encountered. We
replaced all LTO1 drives with LTO2 in one go (with TSM 5.1.6.3 at that time).
> How does the transferrate changes?
Not much, loading (and TSM labellin
I am going to install an Exchange server with a TSM client and backup
all the data to our TSM server. Every day I would like the TSM server to
checkout the volume/s that are used by the Exchange node (we are going
to be taking a full backup each day). Does anyone out there have an
example of a scri
Zoltan,
This is a known problem.
Go to:
www.ibm.com
Search for:
ACO0004E
You will see a KB article about how to resolve this.
In a nutshell, you need to uninstall Data Protection for SQL and
re-install it. If that doesn't resolve it, you may need to uninstall
the base client and re-install
Has anybody come across this before.
The TSM Server v5.2.2 for Windows distributions do not contain any Windows
compiled HTML files (*.CHM). However when I upgraded my servers from
v5.2.1.3, the install deleted the existing files from my C:\Program
Files\Tivoli\TSM\doc directory. The TSM Online In
My Windows person has been updating the clients on 2K3 boxes (since we
have been seeing some of the issues addressed in this patch level).
Now, all of those boxes with MS-SQL TDP clients, are screwed/not backing
up. Here is her message:
all the boxes with the sql tdp i upgraded to 5.2.2.5 have sa
Yep. Already checked all of these.
Yes, the library is online. Checked with both the web/RMU and physically.
Even power-recycled the box.
Yes, I am doing a define of the PATH to the LIBRARY, not the drives.
TAPEUTIL can't talk to the library, either.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chris,
I think it is not possible to restore only the NTFS sec. information . Maybe
you can get it back with CHKNTFS ( /?)
This will restore/regenerate the NTFS tables . This command helped me
sometimes
Christian , as you say it could be in the system state. I Think it is not
there , the onl
Christian
Thanks for your reply
However file permissions attributes are backed up /restored with the
files... I don't think the permissions are stored in the system state I
think this because when we change permissions on a file, the file gets
backed up again (as per the client manual). I'd
Hi Chris!
I don't know I'm correct. But does'nt all Windows security stays in System State?
That mean NTFS permissions, User accounts, Groups, Domain settings and et c.
You maybe need to comfrm that with a Windows guy. But if it true. Just restore the
System state and you got the permissions back
We did a full database backup to disk and could remove the volhist for
the tape afterwards. Problem solved.
Thanks,
Geert
Etienne Brodeur wrote:
This seems to be your last DB backup as far as TSM is concerned so it
won't allow you to delete it. How are you taking your DB backups to disk?
It doe
Change schedmode to prompted on the client and restart the scheduler.
With schedmode polling the start of schedule is dependent on the randomization setting
on the TSM server (q sys).
-Original Message-
From: Cecily Hewlett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vrijdag 5 maart 2004 10:09
T
I need with my tsm scheduler. It seems to be wasting alot of time...
I am running TSM 5.1.6 across fibre, with 8 clients backing up to a
3583 LTO with 2 drives on a SAN.
I stop and start my client schedulers & the storage agents from cron.
Often a scheduled event, which is due to start at 15:
I will be out of the office starting March 1, 2004 and will not return
until March 8, 2004.
I will respond to your message when I return. My managers name and email is
: Neobe Velis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi All
I want to know whether there is a way to restore "only" ntfs file
permissions on win2k. We are running tsm server 5.2.2.1 and 5.2 clients.
The reason for this is that last night during some maintenance, a windows
drive (all directories and files) lost all its permissions. The directories
Hi Zoltan,
When you say you are trying to define a path to /dev/smc0 you are trying to
define
a path to the library - not the drives - so even if the drives are
responding fine with
the tapeutil command you can still have problems with the library - the
drives can function
without the library when
hmm ... did you connect all cables at the back of library ?
yeah funny but i didnt so i had problems ...
goran
- Original Message -
From: "Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Can't define IBM3583-L72 LTO li
Hi,
as already posted here,
you can place cache on C: drive
and exclude this drive from OFS:
include.fs C: fileleveltype=dynamic
regards
Juraj
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Jelf, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 04. März 2004 18:52
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff
31 matches
Mail list logo
