Hi,
I would like to use the command line interface to run a command (or select statement)
to get an estimate of the total size of objects backed up under a particular
filesystem by a particular node for a particular date. In fact I want to achive the
same result as provided by the TSM client GU
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004, TSM_User wrote:
> Perl is installed by default with the NT resource kits and active perl has become a
> pretty standard language for Windows. You don't need to install anything from
> cygwin. Also you can use acitve states perl devlopers kit to complie a *.pl into an
> *.
Question,
Why not use the DISK device class with RAW volumes?
Personally, I find FILE classes a pain for user storage because you DO have to
perform reclamation on them.
Ian Hobbs
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:48:07 -0400, Eliza Lau wrote:
>Okay. I got it. It is a pain to manually define the volu
Remember with Windows 2003 you don't use adsmscsi you use tsmscsi. Also you actually
install it on each drive now, you no longer have one device driver running that grabs
all the drives. The latest TSM Manual has a detailed step by step on how to install
the device driver and you follow exactly
Welcome back Zlatko.
Did you have a year long vacation, or I lost a sense of time.
Joe Crnjanski
Infinity Network Solutions Inc.
Phone: 416-235-0931 x26
Fax: 416-235-0265
Web: www.infinitynetwork.com
-Original Message-
From: Zlatko Krastev/ACIT [mailto:Zlatko_Krastev/[EMAIL PROTEC
Perl is installed by default with the NT resource kits and active perl has become a
pretty standard language for Windows. You don't need to install anything from cygwin.
Also you can use acitve states perl devlopers kit to complie a *.pl into an *.exe and
then you don't even need to install pe
TSM Client V5.3.2.1, TDP for SQL V5.2.1, TSM Storage Agent V5.2.3.2 TSM Server
V5.2.3.2.
Windows 2003 Itanium Cluster with 2 servers.
We are doing some SQL backup testing today. We have a 2.5 TB database that we backed
up at 477 GB/hr to 10 tape drives using LANFree (2.5 TB's in 5.1 hours).
We
Our DBA's are currently testing a product called SQL LiteSpeed. When it was installed
the TSM backup archive command line and GUI stopped working. When you would launch
either they would hang and never start. I thought IP or port issue but the TSM admin
command line which was set to use the s
We changed our settings to the following. I'll let you all know if this
fixes the problem in our case. Thanks for all the advice. So far so good.
After we made the changes, I stopped both instances of TSM, and the paging
space was reclaimed in about 5 minutes. It's sitting at 74.3% free now,
after
The manual you are looking for is named "IBM Informix Backup and Restore
Guide". You can find it at URL
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/data/informix/pubs/library/interim/ct1slna-pdf.html
Or you can browse the whole library of Informix Dynamic Server manuals at
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/dat
Okay. I got it. It is a pain to manually define the volumes, but it can be
done. I also received your pdf file.
Thanks to everyone who answered,
Eliza
>
> It depends upon how you configure things. For dynamic allocation of
> volumes, then yes you are limited to the size of the file system that
On Sep 20, 2004, at 2:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, JFS2 has a max filesystem size quite a bit bigger than that.
I've
got several 2.5TB filesystems right now, and I've had them up to 10TB.
For completeness:
See also IBM site article "Maximum capacity of an ITSM disk volume."
(search on
/testfs may grow to 1 TB
there is a way to cheat:
def v filepool /test2fs/file
def v filepool /test2fs/file0001
...
so using a script you can manually define more volumes outside the
devclass-defined directory. their sizes are as defined in the devclass.
another approach might be hierarchy of
==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Eliza Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The FILE devclass defines a directory as its destination and JFS2
> has a max file system size of 1TB. Does it mean the largest stgpool
> I can define is 1TB?
Actually, JFS2 has a max filesystem size quite a bit bigger
It depends upon how you configure things. For dynamic allocation of
volumes, then yes you are limited to the size of the file system that
you mount on that mount point. However if you define the stgpool
volumes explicitly using the DEFINE VOLUME command, you can place the
volumes across as many f
Hi
Go with the TSM backup client 5.2.3.1
Luc
"LeBlanc, Patricia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-09-20 01:21 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:TSM Storage Agent
Mark,
Where do you define this
I use this command to define a diskpool:
def devclass fileclass devtype=file maxcap=64g dir=/testfs
def stgpool filepool fileclass pooltype=primary maxscratch=100
/testfs is a JFS2 filesystem. How big can /testfs grow to? The documents
say 1TB.
When volumes are
Anyone know how to get the tsm storage agent up and running on W2003?
Am having major problems with device drivers.
TSM Server 5.2.2.5 on AIX 5.1
TSM Storage Agent 5.2.2.5 on W2K3
TSM Backup Client 5.2.0 on W2K3
Thanks!
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eliza Lau
>Our 3494 with 3590K tapes in 3 frames is getting full.
>Instead of adding another frame or upgrading to 3590H or 3592
>tapes we are looking into setting up a bunch of cheap ATA
>disks as primary storage.
>
>The FIL
Our 3494 with 3590K tapes in 3 frames is getting full. Instead of adding
another frame or upgrading to 3590H or 3592 tapes we are looking into setting
up a bunch of cheap ATA disks as primary storage.
The FILE devclass defines a directory as its destination and JFS2
has a max file system size of
One simple approach that has been very effective in reducing the DB
impact when archiving lots of small files for me has been to simply
ensure the archived files a tar bundled before sending them to TSM.
Matt.
Man Makes The Machine.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [m
Thanks for all who replied, (we had missed the 'halting of the server')
It ended up being that we never halted the 2nd server instance after
running the dsmserv runfile. It's now working.
Nancy Backhaus
Enterprise Systems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Office: (716) 887-7979
Cell: (716) 609-2138
Cur
Okay: How much physical memory do you have in the system? Also, I think your
max/min/num settings are good, but try turning on "strict_maxperm". In
about 5-10 minutes, you *should* see a tremendous increase in pages
on the free list in vmstat. Another thing is to set your "minfree" and
"maxfree
Thank you.
Here is what I currently have:
vmtune:2:once:/usr/samples/kernel/vmtune -f 1024 -F 2048 -u 64 -p 5 -P 10 -r 2 -R 256
-l 65536 -w 32000 -b 384 -c 4 -B 960 -Q 256 -Z 1536 -t 10
maxperm=10.0% of real memory
minperm=5.0% of real memory
maxclient=10.0% of real memory
I have not set -h (st
Oh yeah: I've gotten this. what you want to do is have a look at
your virtual memory tunings with "vmtune". Of particular
interest are your "maxperm", "minperm", "numclient", and
"strict_maxperm" settings. Remember that, all TSM is, is a
DB2 database, so you need to tune your VMM subsystem accordi
Hi all
Thank you Micheal
It's working perfectly
have a nice day
Luc
Christian Svensson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
2004-09-20 12:42 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
Oops:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/>lsattr -El sys0
realmem 4194304 Amount of usable physical memory in Kbytes
False
Too early in the morning; it has 4GB. Which IMHO, i would think is enough to run AIX
and TSM.
Thanks for the previous suggestions posted to the list, but
On Sep 20, 2004, at 9:03 AM, Miles Purdy wrote:
I have also seen paging space issues my server that runs only TSM.
OS: AIX 5.1 ML 6
TSM server: 5.1 and 5.2.3.1
Memory: 2GB
Space: 2 GB (now 3 GB)
We have logged cases with IBM, to no avail. I have check all the
settings myself. IBM has checked everyt
Thanks. I'll check that out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are a number of things to check :
1) Is the TSM database spread out over multiple disks ? Having the database
spread over multiple disks will result in faster read/writes to disk and
improve the performance.
2) Check the top ten processes on the server when the paging space is high :
ps -A
I have also seen paging space issues my server that runs only TSM.
OS: AIX 5.1 ML 6
TSM server: 5.1 and 5.2.3.1
Memory: 2GB
Space: 2 GB (now 3 GB)
We have logged cases with IBM, to no avail. I have check all the settings myself. IBM
has checked everything and found no problems. I'd also be inte
==> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Browne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We're looking at possibly revamping our TSM system. We've got a OS/390
> server. Looking at all possibilities (adding disk or tape or bandwidth to
> our current server OR changing to a different TSM server platform l
Hi
This really depends on what type of client you're trying to restore.
For large databases, the fastest way would be to utilize the LAN-free
functionality.
For file-servers, utilizing LAN-free is not an option, as it will not
speed up the transferrate of data. If the fileserver cant be restor
We're looking at possibly revamping our TSM system. We've got a OS/390
server. Looking at all possibilities (adding disk or tape or bandwidth
to our current server OR changing to a different TSM server platform
like AIX) what hardware configuration would give us the fastest D/R of
a l
34 matches
Mail list logo
