I've gotta ask Geoff,
Why, with a 3494 and LTO library would you move TSM to LTO? My first option
would be to move veritas to the 3494.
3494 is industrial strength and plays well in multi host and multi
application environments. Use 3592 drives and you'll have capacity to burn.
Also, second-hand
Since there was only one response I think I need to give a bit of info to
help with why I'm asking the question.
We have TSM and Veritas here. Not something I wanted but its here. Currently
each reside on their own libraries mainly because one is LTO2(Veritas) and
the other a 3494(TSM). I'd like
Couple of things comes to my mind.
Without knowing what your TSM environment is like it's hard to say..
however, these similar situation might happen.
Out of scratch tapes. Disk pools fill up to 100%. Migration from disk to
tape pools fail.. tape copies from onsite to offsite fail.
TSM database
I have to agree for off-site reclamation. With reclamation running you
can take up additional tapes that are off-site giving you even less to
work with at the present time. Reclamation for your local tapes(on-site
tapepool) should help gain back tapes.
Eric
-Original Message-
From: ADSM
I'm trying to set up virtual volumes for DB Backups. I have, in this order,
upd server targetserver serverpa=pw nodename=sourceserver
def dev dbbackup devt=server servername=targetserver
reg no sourceserver pw t=server
When I run
ba db t=full dev=dbback
it fails with ANR0424W - invalid password.
W
should the parameter not be begindate
-Original Message-
From: Del Hoobler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 1:55 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:Re: Result 402
402 is a general error code, with no associated meaning.
You will need to look at the Da
402 is a general error code, with no associated meaning.
You will need to look at the Data Protection for Exchange log
to find out what the problem is.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 05/06/2005
01:28:23 PM:
> Hi list,
>
> Af
Hi list,
After issuing a "q event * * begindata=-7 f=d" command I have the
following (part of the output):
Policy Domain Name: Policy_name
Schedule Name: BKP_SRV_EXCHANGE_FULL
Node Name: EM1-EXCHANGE
Scheduled Start: 04/29/2005 01:00:00
Actual Start: 04/29/2005 01:00:08
Dave
I disagree with John's recommendation to step up tape reclamation to get
over a short term lack of scratch tapes unless your pending re-use delay
will expire before the tapes arrive.
My inclination would be to stop all reclamations until the new tapes
arrive. Reclamation gives you a benefit
Dave
The number of days that information is kept in the SQL activity summary
table is configurable.
Try HELP SET SUMMARYRETENTION for info.
Regards
Neil Schofield
Yorkshire Water Services Ltd.
Did you know - in Africa and Asia 1 billion people still don't have access to
safe water - 9th - 1
Folks,
Thanks!
That clears up some things..
Activity Log Retention Period: 2 Day(s)
Activity Summary Retention Period: 30 Day(s)
Thanks again!
DaveZ
"Thorneycroft,
Doug"To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
You are searching the activity log, which has a user defined retention
period. You can set the retention using the command:
set actlogretention ##
Where ## is the number of days to retaining records.
You can see your current settings by issuing a "query status"
command.
Doug Thorneycroft
Systems
Do a "q status". That will show the retention period for ACTLOG and SUMMARY.
At 12:21 PM 5/6/2005 -0400, you wrote:
I'm doing some lookups for amount of data being backed up.
Here's the statement:
select
nodes.domain_name,summary.activity,sum(cast(summary.bytes/1024/1024/1024 as
decimal(6,2)))
as
I'm doing some lookups for amount of data being backed up.
Here's the statement:
select
nodes.domain_name,summary.activity,sum(cast(summary.bytes/1024/1024/1024 as
decimal(6,2)))
as GB from nodes, summary
where (end_time between '2005-03-28' and '2005-03-31')
and (activity='BACKUP' or activity='
Please be more specific, what is it that you
are looking for in the database?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Dave Zarnoch
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 8:59 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Time limit on TSM DB?
Folks,
Sorry if thi
Folks,
Sorry if this is a "FAQ"..
I'm trying to generate reports from our TSM database that are
older than 1 month old and I am not finding any info.
Is this the time retention on the DB?
How do I find out?
Thanks!
DaveZ
> I got to thinking about 3494 category codes in the middle of the night
> when I should have been sleeping (can you tell my DR test is soon?).
>
> If I load the DR 3494 with my copypool tapes and let the 3494 do an
> audit operation while I am restoring my tsm machine from a sysback
> tape, will a
Well, unhappy management springs to mind.
But for the short period you are talking about, can't you do one or more
of
1) Add extra disk storage
2) Step up reclamation
3) Look at tape reuse delay
4) Check whether you have any filespaces not accessed for a long time. Are
their backups still required?
Folks,
UNfortunately as a result of miscommunication with our supplier,
we will be running out of scratch tapes in the next few days.
We should have a new shipment returning on Monday but, in
the meantime, it appears that we will run out Sunday evening.
Aside from missing backups, what other repe
If you go in and look at some of the queries already defined by Tivoli in the
default hourly monitor it shows that the SQL WHERE
clause compares the date/times "BETWEEN '%s" and '%s'" . I've used this syntax
in my own queries and it works fine. I've never found
any documentation on it, just a lit
On May 6, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Doyle, Patrick wrote:
Unfortunately, any time I Audit a volume my server crashes abruptly!
That's what maintenance is for... You can go to a higher level than
your 5.1.6.2, where there are fixes for Audit Volume problems, per
the server Readme file.
Richard Sims
Hi Patrick!
This is probably related to APAR IC36609 which has been fixed in 5.1.8.0.
Why don't you upgrade to the latest 5.1 level, which is 5.1.10.0?
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Doyle, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, M
Thanks Richard. Hope these question are not too basic--but guess I gotta
start somewhere
(who do I see about getting you a raise...)
|-+>
| | "Richard Sims" |
| | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| | Sent by: "
On May 6, 2005, at 8:25 AM, Doyle, Patrick wrote:
Hi,
I have a volume that appears to empty, but I can't delete it, or
reclaim it.
Any ideas?
A frequent question. Do an Audit Volume.
Richard Sims
I got to thinking about 3494 category codes in the middle of the night when I
should have been sleeping (can you tell my DR test is soon?).
If I load the DR 3494 with my copypool tapes and let the 3494 do an audit
operation while I am restoring my tsm machine from a sysback tape, will all the
Unfortunately, any time I Audit a volume my server crashes abruptly!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Loon, E.J.
van - SPLXM
Sent: 06 May 2005 13:46
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [Possible Spam] Re: Empty volume cannot be deleted
Hi Patrick!
Try an audit volume for this tape. If you see that it has repaired files,
you will have to do a move data for the tape.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Doyle, Patrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 14:25
To
>I have a volume that appears to empty, but I can't delete it, or reclaim it.
>Any ideas?
>
Do a
audit vol XX fix=yes
Bruno,
From the TSM Help for the Define stgpool command:
The server can perform simultaneous write to copy storage pools for the
following operations:
o Backup and archive operations by Tivoli Storage Manager
backup-archive clients or application clients using the T
On May 6, 2005, at 4:44 AM, Baker Brendan wrote:
OSD-02041: unable to duplicate a string
Cause: There is not enough contiguous memory available to perform the
task.
Action: Wait a few minutes and try the operation again-memory may
have been freed by other processes. If this happens often, reduce th
Hallo,
And thanks for the suggestions, they prompted us to investigate a few
avenues.
We tracked it down to an issue with the 5.2.0.0 client on Solaris.
Upgrading to 5.2.2.0 has fixed the problem - although I am still trying
to find a page on ibm.com describing the fault.
Thanks,
Matt.
Com
Hi,
I have a volume that appears to empty, but I can't delete it, or reclaim it.
Any ideas?
TIA
Pat Doyle
TSM Server Version 5.1.6.2
tsm: EAGLESTAR_TSM>q drm 75l1
Volume Name State Last Update Automated
Date/
Yes, is possible, we have a couple installations running where the same
library supports both backup products, with IBM3584, and with L700. I am
pretty sure you can do it with all the large scale libraries provided that
the library supports true sharing and zoning.
Brgds,
Othonas Xixis
IBM Global
Hi Eric,
I have checked the sbtio.log file in the udump directories for both RMAN and
PROD database. RMAN stbio.log is empty and PROD stbio.log has a last
modified date of 18/04/05.
Our issue started on 04/05/05.
Regards,
Brendan
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailt
Hi Brendan!
The location of sbtio.log is controlled by the user_dump_dest option in your
Oracle initialization file. The default is directory is
$ORACLE_HOME/admin/hostname/udump
You could also use the find command...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message--
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the reply. I'm a DBA with not much experience of Tivoli.
Where should this log file be located?
Regards,
Brendan
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM
Sent: 06 May 2005 10:10
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARI
Hi Brendan!
Look for the sbtio.log file, it probably contains more useful information
about the error.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: Baker Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 06, 2005 10:44
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject
hi all, i'll first explain the situation and then tell you what we want do ,
i appreciate every
reply and help you offer
TSM 5.2.4.0 on pSeries 640
2x8 port switch
LTO library L32 with 12 LTO1 drives
(and the same configuration on DR site)
as we approached the capacity of this one LTO library we ha
Hi,
Yesterday all our RMAN scripts failed with the follow error message:
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-00569: === ERROR MESSAGE STACK FOLLOWS ===
RMAN-00571: ===
RMAN-030
Dear All,
My TSM backup server holds approx 15Tb of data collected from some 80
servers.
The twin 4560 library holds 56 tapes.
Approx. 150 tapes are offline.
The primary disk storage is 120Gb.
As you can imagine reclamation takes quite a lot of time as the system
become overloaded since it was put
40 matches
Mail list logo