Hi,
STK SL500 is only supported by TSM 5.3 server from the current doc from
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.htmldated
Apr 2005.
Do any one have any idea if the SL500 is supported by TSM 5.2.6 since it is
released after the doc?
Hi,
STK SL500 is only supported by TSM 5.3 server from the current doc
from
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/sysmgmt/products/support/IBM_TSM_Supported_Devices_for_AIXHPSUNWIN.html
dated Apr 2005.
Do any one have any idea if the SL500 is supported by TSM 5.2.6 since it is
released after the doc?
On Oct 3, 2005, at 12:22 AM, Paul Dudley wrote:
Subject: Missing tape in TSM 5.2
Running TSM 5.2, I have a tape that is not defined in a storage
pool yet
I cannot check it in with a status of scratch.
If I check it in with a status of private I then cannot do anything
with
it.
When I run the
Hi *SM-ers!
For those of you who missed it: the TSM 5.3.2.0. server levels are available
for download.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
**
For information, services and offers, please visit our web site:
Thanks again Andrew,
I appreciate your response!
Andrew Raibeck wrote:
At a minimum, your main concern should be that your TSM client software
level is supported with your TSM server level. In order to ease migration
to new levels, client and software are supported one release up or down.
Hi,
Would it be possible to give some comments on next please ?
Because we are requesting some more diskspace (500 GB) for TSM on our
mainframe
our management is wondering why we do not run TSM on AIX where diskspace
is much cheaper.
I agree with them that diskspace is cheaper on AIX, but I
Hello Everyone,
I have been having issues where our Fujitsu servers, which archive Oracle
data, are losing their TCP/IP connectivity to the TSM server with the
messages of:
09/30/05 00:05:06 ANS1017E Session rejected: TCP/IP connection failure
The TSM client is as follows:
Node
Hi All
I recently when to our off-site location where our Copypool DR volumes are
housed to make sure that all the tapes I thought should be there actually
were. That part of the mission was a success and all tapes were present.
However, I also came across a whole bunch of tapes that weren't on
Hi,
Looks like 2 clusters failover again and again. Maybe consult your
sysadmin?
Regards,
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Joni Moyer
Sent: maandag 3 oktober 2005 16:23
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: TCP/IP connectivity
Farren,
I've seen this happen before when the TSM DB tapes get out of sync with
DRM. Basically, what we do, is once a quarter we perform an audit. We get
a list from the offsite vendor and compare it to the output from q drm.
Any tapes that are on the offsite vendor's list and not on the q drm
Hi,
Actually those 2 servers aren't clustered. Please ignore any messages for
FJSU112. This issue is occuring on more than one of our Solaris servers
and that was just a small portion of the error messages I am receiving on
them. Sorry for the confusion! Any other ideas as to what is
Thanks for that Sean
That's kind of what I expected and our DB volumes expire after five days so
this should be OK. But I think I will keep a close eye on the DB volume
numbers from now on and see if they do end up coming back or not.
Many thanks
Farren Minns
Please post what browser and Java level you are using.
Orville L. Lantto
Datatrend Technologies, Inc. (http://www.datatrend.com)
IBM Premier Business Partner
121 Cheshire Lane, Suite 700
Minnetonka, MN 55305
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
V: 952-931-1203
F: 952-931-1293
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This
upgraded from 5.3.1.4 to to producition TSM after testing instalation on
test tsm server,
on test server the starting was okay, worked fine ... on
produciotn it hangs with REPAIR LIBVOL (why is this started?)
and it hangs on EXPIRATION process and does NOT move on
!!!
server is aix 5.2.ML4 p640
Hello,
Do you see this error:
ANR0106E imarqry.c(4655): Unexpected error 2 fetching row in table
Archive.Objects
I' have tsm server versione 5.2.6 HP-UX
When display retrieve date from client guy from client 5.2.4 on HP-UX I see
this error
regards, Mario
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mario Di Pede
Do you see this error:
ANR0106E imarqry.c(4655): Unexpected error 2 fetching row in table
Archive.Objects
I' have tsm server versione 5.2.6 HP-UX
When display retrieve date from client guy from client 5.2.4
on
Hi Everyone,
We may need to put a couple of tape libraries into sites where floor space
is very tight. The libraries would probably need around 300-400 tapes and
6-8 drives, with
room to expand to possibly double or more in size. I went browsing for
libraries that
pack lots of tapes and drives
I am also a mainframer, having spent MANY years doing mainframe storage
management/performance management/capacity planning.
And I LOVE running TSM on AIX.
I never would have believed it until I implemented it myself, but AIX
can push I/O AMAZINGLY fast, it is a terrific TSM platform.
Running TSM
Hi All,
We would like to hook up a Solaris machine to our 3494/3590-H config,
as well as a 3584/lto2 setup. All of the drives are SAN attached. I am
having difficulties finding out from IBM what HBAs are support by IBMtape
and TSM so that I can configure Solaris 2.9 to see and use these
Hi Everyone,
I am completely new to Tivoli.
I have set up TSM server 5.3.0 on Redhat Linux, RHEL3.
I am experiencing a few issues regarding the management of tapes et al.
Inorder not to waste your time with questions that may have been answered 100
times, I would appreciate a link to archives
Hello Steve
We have an 3584/lto2 with connections to solaris 9 boxes.
You can find the support hba from the 3584 point of view at this url:
http://knowledge.storage.ibm.com/servers/storage/support/hbasearch/interop/hbaSearch.do
My fuzzy memory says that the ibmtape readme goes into what it
22 matches
Mail list logo
