Hi David,
You might have to stop & start TSM.
I had to when I added some more drives to our 3584.
Regards,
Stephen.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
David E Ehresman
Sent: Monday, 7 May 2007 23:22
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject:
Paul,
Please send a summary.
I'm are also interested about this issue which is coming to us in the near
future.
Thanks,
Juan Perla
University of Washington
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Paul Zarnowski wrote:
I am looking for best/common practice for backing up an MS Exchange
2007 server.
We find ourse
Hi Paul,
Actually... Data Protection for Exchange support for
Exchange Server 2007 is not as far off as you think. :-)
In fact... we just RTM'ed the support last week.
I "expect" that Data Protection for Exchange version "5.4.1"
supporting Exchange Server 2007 (64-bit) legacy backup and restore
I am looking for best/common practice for backing up an MS Exchange
2007 server.
We find ourselves in a position where we have to backup an MS
Exchange 2007 server for a small group of folks here. We know that
TSM supports Exchange 2003, but 2007 support is a ways off. I am
also aware that Syma
Has anyone else seen this issue with the newer clients? According to the
readme on 5.2.3.0 this was supposedly resolved but we have a client at
level 5.4.0.2 showing these errors in the logs.
05/03/2007 15:01:20 jnlWrite(): Pipe connection was severed, attempting
re-establish session on pipe '\
I moved a drive from one logical library to another in a 3584.
TSM is running on aix. lsdev -Cctape shows the drive. When I try to define
the path to tsm, I'm getting the following error:
tsm: ULTSM>define path ultsm drive506 srct=server destt=drive library=3584 autod
etect=yes device=/dev/r
On May 7, 2007, at 5:55 AM, Ibán Bernaldo de Quirós Márquez wrote:
Hi World,
Could someone explain me the following columns of the summary
table... as far as I understood, the 'examined' column must show
the number of objects processed by the session, and the 'affected'
column the number
Hi World,
Could someone explain me the following columns of the summary table...
as far as I understood, the 'examined' column must show the number of
objects processed by the session, and the 'affected' column the number
of objects that have changed since last backup processed by this
sessio
