Thanks Richard,
Not very sure which processes were running at the time as I had to bounce TSM
in the meantime. By the way, where can I find that technote?
thanks as always.
Daad
Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sep 10, 2007, at 3:48 PM, Daad Ali wrote:
Hi,
my q stg
Hello Daad,
I had this same issue. It's IC51826. I had to upgrade the server to
5.3.5.2 to fix this issue. I would still verify this with IBM support,
but your situation appears to be the same.
Good luck!
Joni Moyer
Highmark
Storage Systems, Storage Mngt
In case anyone is interested - a small refinement to the select statement
to omit clutter:
select * from backupsets, volhistory where date(backupsets.date_time) =
date(volhistory.date_time) and volhistory.type in ('BACKUPSET','BACKUPSET
FULL')
Comments from development on how to really find the
We have a client with a couple old Netware 4.11 servers running TSM client
4.2.3.0. These nodes will be retired and the hardware
will go away. But there is a requirement to keep the data for possible future
restores. We were thinking of installing a newer
version of Netware as a VMware virtual
Novell has a Server Consolidation Utility that allows you to move data from
old servers to newer ones. It's a free download.
We attempted to preform a backup and restore and ran into issues with the
volume sizes being different.
Kevin
William Boyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/11/07 12:52 PM
We
Hi
Block size, queue depth, sequential v random read, back end
spindles/design, array cache size, other array traffic etc will all play a
part.
On an Windows system with default NTFS block size, with queue depth of 16,
on a dedicated HDS array I can quite easily sustain approx 400MBs on a
I've been asked to compare Backup Exec to Tivoli for upper management and
need to find a white paper that describes the differences. I found one on
IBM's website but it's dated 2002 which is a little old. Does anyone have a
link to a newer one they want to share?
Thanks,
Mark
Confidentiality
There is no comparison...
;')
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing CTO
STORServer, Inc.
485-B Elkton Drive
Colorado Springs, CO 80907
719-266-8777
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Remeta, Mark
Sent: Tuesday, September
I was going to say the same thing...
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kelly Lipp
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 12:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Comparison
There is no comparison...
;')
Kelly J. Lipp
I know that but I have to prove it to 'upper management'.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Kelly Lipp
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2007 2:25 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Comparison
There is no comparison...
;')
Kelly J.
Hello Joerg,
with TSM 5.4, the QUERY BACKUPSET command now has the
detailed format output available (F=D). If you use the detailed format
output, it should display the volume. For example :
tsm: TSM02q backupset mygroup f=d
Node Name: TESTNODE1
Backup Set Name:
Hi Ian,
Great information...
I had no idea Windows 2003 could get read speeds of 400MB/s.
My proposed VTL does not do de-dupe in line, it is a post process so I am not
concerned with VTL performance.
I need to backup about 10 TB's from the array. This is a mix of file system,
email and
If we currently have 6 3590-h drives in the 3494 library, do you think can
we get by with 4 LTO-4 drives in the new libraries given that speed and
storage capacity is so much better with LTO-4 drives? Most of the tape
activity is backups only. Occasionally we have a file restore or two.
It
John,
If you are experienced with the 3494 library, they are working well
and tape mount speed is acceptable, you may consider just replacing the
3590 drives with TS1120 (3592) drives. The cartridges fit in the same
slots as 3590 cartridges and you can significantly increase the capacity
of
To echo that, used 3494 tape libraries are going for cheap these days.
We recently bought a used one that had 7 frames and 5 new TS1120 tape
drives for under 100K. That's somewhere between 660TB and 1.8PB for
$100K.
For this case where we have about 8TB a day of seldom accessed archives
that we
In general TSM will send 1 stream for each source, but I would suggest
that you go to a disk pool first unless the objects are very large. We
run our large BCV backup to disk then migrate to virtual tape later.
What you have to be careful of is creating too many virtual drives as
this may slow
The only drawbacks being the need to upgrade the library managers to
a level that will support TS1120, and the maintenance costs compared
to a TS3500 et al.
[RC]
On Sep 11, 2007, at 1:56 PM, Strand, Neil B. wrote:
John,
If you are experienced with the 3494 library, they are working well
17 matches
Mail list logo
