Redhat ES 4, ISC6.0.1.1 install. Just loaded the Redhat and nothing else is on
it. The install goes through the 6.0.1 and then
proceeds to the 6.0.1.1 patch, gets to 99% and then hangs. Never goes any
farther. This is the 2nd time I've gotten this condition.
Which is why I went back to a fresh in
unsubscribeSUBSCRIBE ADSM-L
Steve,
You will need to relocate full-text catalogs also.
When relocating databases that contain full-text catalogs, the full text
catalog names will also need to be specified as values to /relocate ... /to
options. E.g.
tdpsqlc restore SQLDB1
/relocate=datafile1,datafile2,log1,sysft_PageCatalo
KP,
The TSM Server Installation Guide addresses your question. For AIX the
this link should work.
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v1r1/index.jsp?topic=/
com.ibm.itsmfdt.doc/b_install_guide_aix35.htm
Regards,
Larry McNutt
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manag
If you are mounting/unmounting tapes from the current TSM server without
ACSLS then you don't need it for the Storage Agent/LAN-Free backup.
Just let the TSM manage the library.
I'm doing this currently with an STK-L700 library, 2 TSM servers and 10
STA's.
Gerald Michalak
IBM TSM Certified Admi
Guys,
Can any one point me to the documentation that talks about configuring
additional TSM Server in the same server?
Regards
KP
At 01:58 PM 12/12/2007, Hart, Charles A wrote:
We are using the "Other" de-duping product Diligent Protectier
There are actually quite a few de-duping storage products on the
market now. IBM also discussed TSM-based dedup possibilities at the
Oxford TSM Symposium a couple of months ago.
--
The answer is yes, the exact why however, will have to be answered by someone
else. I believe it has to do with the DB design and TSM will only recognize
the actual last recorded DB size, not the last utilized size.
Ryan Miller
Storage Solutions Engineer
MSI Systems Integrators
2600 Westown Pa
Yes. Just because is probably the best answer. It has to do with the
way the db structure is laid out originally. If you were to reduce the
database on the original system before you do the backup, then you could
restore into a smaller database...
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORServ
Have DB with size of 31,440 MB. Attempting to
load a copy of the database on my recovery
system. DB is 53% full.
Available Assigned Maximum MaximumPage Total Used
Pct Max.
Space Capacity Extension ReductionSizeUsable Pages Util
Pct
(MB) (MB) (M
Helder,
In our case we always direct the DB backup to a particular tape library by
design.
backup db type=full devclass=ltoclass7
where ltoclass7 only has one device in it; which is in our DR alternate
site, online electronic tape vault.
Larry
Helder Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "AD
Don,
If you install and configure a storage agent on your client with 2.5 TB
of data, you can take a backup across the SAN.
The backup starts, the client sees in his dsm.sys file that it should go
LANfree. The storage agent asks through TCP/IP the TSM server to mount
him a tape in a drive. The TS
The changed attribs update refers to basic file attributes, such as
readwrite/readonly flag, archive bit, basic security (rwxrwxrwx), etc.,
that are stored in the TSM server database, not as part of the file data
in the storage pools. The intent of this behavior is to optimize backup
time by updati
There was a lengthy discussion six or so weeks ago on this topic.
Perhaps head to the list archives and check out that discussion. It
didn't touch, much, on specific connectivity, etc., but went into quite
good detail about the pros and cons.
Thanks,
Kelly J. Lipp
VP Manufacturing & CTO
STORSe
General VTL Response, not using Data Domain with TSM using it on
Netbackup. We are using the "Other" de-duping product Diligent
Protectier which works with TSM on p570's the challenge for us is that
the Diligent devices only emulate DLT, so using the atape driver is out,
we have to use the TSM Dev
Just one idea (not tested):
>From ¨IBM Tivoli Storage Manager: Building a Secure Environment" -
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/abstracts/sg247505.html?Open [personal marketing
here :) ]
On page 46 we have a script to collect current permissions from a tree of
directory and its files.
[EMAIL PROTEC
Eric -
It looks like your system is storing about the same amount of data, 26TB
/ 27TB, as our system is but I notice that you are using over 300 more
LTO2 tapes to store it on. Is that correct?
Are you using collocation? What does 'q collocgroup' show?
Also, what format are you using for the
Working a new configuration with SAN-connected Sun-STK SL500; it's working
fine, except one client has huge (2.5 TB) database, needs smaller backup window
(ie, LAN-Free might help).
Do I still need ACSLS in order to share library and drives with storage agents
(or, can the TSM server function a
Hi
We are an IBM shop. We were wondering if anyone is using data domain
material with their TSM system?? We were wonder about interoperability
and any operational concerns with adding a 3rd party product into our
IBM shop which could cause any problems?? Thoughts??
PS -- We do not have any
That's odd, so if you get hit with some virus that messes up all your
permissions, you are out of luck? Or worse, a junior CHMOD admin?!
-Shawn
Shawn Drew
Data Protection Engineer
Core IT Production
BNP Paribas RCC, Inc.
Internet
[EMAIL PROTEC
Eric, I meant collocation. It can be by node, by group, by filespace or no
collocation.
On Dec 12, 2007 11:06 AM, Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi Helder!
> I'm 100% sure reclamation is set to 60% on all storage pools on all
> servers.
> Kindest regards,
> Eric van Loon
> KL
On Tue, Dec 11, 2007 at 09:43:29AM -0600, Shawn Drew wrote:
> I'm trying to figure out when the permission of certain files changed. I
> ran a few tests, and I'm not sure I like the behavior of TSM. Maybe I'm
> missing something.
>
> - I backed up a file a month ago.
> - The file hasn't changed
Hi Helder!
I'm 100% sure reclamation is set to 60% on all storage pools on all
servers.
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Helder Garcia
Sent: woensdag 12 december 2007 12:43
To: A
Hi Larry!
We are using EMC DL700 disk libraries which emulate several 3584
libraries with LTO2 tapes.
Personally, I find the difference between primary and copy pool tape
count in your shop not as shocking as mine though...
Kindest regards,
Eric van Loon
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
-Original Mes
Hi Andy!
I have 3 servers (LBU1, LBU2 and LBU3) running. Checkout their private
volume count:
DL_LBU1_CPY_1 Private 634
DL_LBU1_PRI_1 Private 643
DL_LBU2_CPY_1 Private 561
DL_LBU2_PRI_1 Private 564
DL_LBU3_CPY_1 Private 441
DL_LBU3_PRI_1 Private 366
Notice that the figures on LBU1
Hi Farren,
Individual Mailbox Restore (IMR) is not yet fully integrated with
Data Protection for Exchange but you can do it using
Data Protection for Exchange along with the Exchange Admin tools.
Here is a distance learning link that shows you how to do it.
(This is for Exchange 2003, but the
Hi all
We have just installed the TDP for exchange to cover our
soon-to-be-going-live Exchange 2007 environment and I'm now being asked the
question "Can we do mailbox level restores?!"
Now, as far as I'm aware the simple answer is no, and that in order to do
this we would need to utilise a 3rd p
Larry, DB backup tapes does not belong to any particular storage pool.
Anyway, your environment shows more acceptable numbers than Eric's. A little
delta (106 to 112) in the number of tapes is always present due to
reclamation running in different moments, incomplete expiration processes an
other f
Hi Michael,
we experienced the same thing when we asked clients to upgrade to 5.4.1.2
( to avoid the security vulnerability in the dsmcad ): Incrementals started
backing up the entire filestore - which gave us a headache at the server end.
Running: dsmc incr -traceflags=service -tracefile=/path/to
29 matches
Mail list logo
