On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:04 AM, Richard van Denzel wrote:
> Hi All,
>
Hi Richard,
>
>
>
> I'm in the process of installing TSM 6.2 on a Linux Server (SLES 11).
> Has anyone managed to get the AC installed on it?
>
> Every time I try it fails in installing the EWAS (WebSphere). And yes I
> am i
I did update drmedia tostate=vault
but not sure why this happen... any insight will be greatly appreciated.
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 4:23 PM, yoda woya wrote:
> When I q drm it states that one of my volume is mountable. However, I
> check the vaulting location and the tape in question is vau
When I q drm it states that one of my volume is mountable. However, I check
the vaulting location and the tape in question is vaulted in our
offsite vaulting location. How do I correct this issue?
Robert,
Thank you. It is a mix of Windows and Linux clients. And, we impose
a cloptset on all clients that includes a dirmc that writes to disk.
Best wishes,
Keith
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 14:07:56 -0400, Keith Arbogast
>> said:
> I'll redefine smaller, more plentiful TSM volumes for this pool, and
> see if that keeps the sand out of my socks.
Heh. :) Good luck.
Don't go nuts with the "smaller" direction. There are major
performance problems at the extre
Are these windows clients? Is the dirmc (directory management class)
pointed to disk or tape?
You may have windows clients queueing up to write their directories to
tape.
[RC]
From:
Keith Arbogast
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
04/30/2010 08:09 AM
Subject:
[ADSM-L] mediawait during backup to
Thanks to all who offered advice. I may have been taking the book
definition of mediawait too literally -- as pertaining to removable
volumes, not disk.
I was able to correlate the MediaWait condition showed by TSMManager
with dsmaccnt.log records for the nodes last night. 20 nodes were
affected
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 10:49:18 -0500, Robert Murphy said:
> This is Robert Murphy with IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Support Line.
> Regarding PMR 42841,442,000,
> TSM 6.1 Linux Backup-Archive client "best effort" supported distributions
> http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&tcss=New
It's not quite what you're asking for, but in case you haven't seen it,
this method has worked well for me to build .deb installers:
http://www.adsm.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16637
Running the client/scheduler perfectly now on 8 servers: Ubuntu 9.04 and
9.10
Last .deb I built was 6.1.3.1.
--
Allen,
perhaps a little tangental to your request but this announcement (?)
certainly passed me by at the time.
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?rs=663&tcss=Newsletter&uid=swg21417165
Regards
Ian Smith
Oxford University
UK
On Friday 30 Apr 2010 3:41 pm, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> So I just
Check out the "Maximum Size Threshold" that is defined for the disk pool
in question. Perhaps you are trying to back up a file larger than the
threshold and now TSM needs to mount a tape to handle that file...
-Jeff Nast
SMDC Health Systems
Duluth MN
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist
Keith,
You could mitigate this somewhat by creating more disk storage pool
volumes, and spreading them across more physical disks.
I don't entirely agree with Allen that your disk pool is going to be
slower than your incoming networks. It is certainly possible to build a
disk storage pool e
>> On Fri, 30 Apr 2010 11:07:35 -0400, Keith Arbogast
>> said:
> What does it mean when a node incurs mediawait during a backup to
> disk?
It means that the process was blocking on disk writes.
Your disk (usually) can't write as fast as your various networks can
pass you data. So there's some
What does it mean when a node incurs mediawait during a backup to
disk? The disk pool was not full, or even close to the Hi Mig
trigger. The mediawait condition is reported by TSMManager, not the
Activity Log, but the node record does show roughly 50 % pct
mediawait . Several clients showed thi
So I just submitted a PMR asking IBM to officially bless some
procedure for getting the client installed on an Ubuntu box.
I was working on a local doc, which was going to be largely cadged
from the advice in the archives of this list, but figured I'd at least
attempt to do the Right Thing.
Last
Gary,
TDPEXCC will return 0 for success and non-0 for a failure.
Thanks,
Del
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 04/30/2010
08:53:27 AM:
> [image removed]
>
> Question on return codes from tdpexcc command
>
> Lee, Gary D.
>
> to:
>
> ADSM-L
Running tdp for exchange 6.1.
I have batch files which are called for either incremental or full backups on
our test exchange server.
At the end of these, I use a utility to send an email of the log of the backup
just performed.
I would like to vary that email based on success or failure of the b
17 matches
Mail list logo
