I agree. I thought it should have gone straight to tape, too. They are
3592-E06 drives in a TS3500 library.
Zoltan Forray
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
VMware Administrator
Xymon Administrator
VCU Computer Center
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing
No, it does not. All volumes are good.
Zoltan Forray
Spectrum Protect (p.k.a. TSM) Software & Hardware Administrator
VMware Administrator
Xymon Administrator
VCU Computer Center
zfor...@vcu.edu - 804-828-4807
Don't be a phishing victim - VCU and other reputable organizations will
never use email t
On 2017-07-18 22:01, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> Finally got some feedback from the node server owner and it explains what
> is going on. This is his comment but I am about to tell him he is wrong
> since the current active session has only backed up 30GB.
>
> *Looks like a single 8.1 TB file caused an
On 2017-07-18 22:08, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> I just got another comment from the server owner that I thought you would
> enjoy:
>
>
>
>
> *I've stopped the backup. I looked at the file, its a zillion lines
> of:Reply (O)verwrite (A)ppend, or (Q)uit [O/A/Q]:*
>
> Endless loop😱
Well, we do expe
Hi,
Could it maybe be that some disk volumes are unavailable?
Does any volume show up launching these two commands?
q v * stg=BACKUPPOOL access=readonly,unavailable,offsite,destroyed
q v * stg=BACKUPPOOL status=offline,empty,pending,filling,full
Giacomo Testa
Mobile +39 342 847 2983
www.lin
I just got another comment from the server owner that I thought you would
enjoy:
*I've stopped the backup. I looked at the file, its a zillion lines
of:Reply (O)verwrite (A)ppend, or (Q)uit [O/A/Q]:*
Endless loop😱
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:56 AM, Sasa Drnjevic
wrote:
> Could be a huge spar
Finally got some feedback from the node server owner and it explains what
is going on. This is his comment but I am about to tell him he is wrong
since the current active session has only backed up 30GB.
*Looks like a single 8.1 TB file caused an error. I started a manual backup
of that file and i
Yes - the default/1. It has been backing up in the past - over 500TB.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Richard Cowen
wrote:
> Node has mount points?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Zoltan Forray
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18
Node has mount points?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:40 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but there is
plenty of space
Y
Yep - 100+ scratch tapes in both tape libraries. As I mentioned, there is
no sign of any attempt to mount a tape and all drives were available at
that time.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Richard Cowen
wrote:
> Do you have lib volumes available (scratch/empty)?
>
> -Original Message-
Do you have lib volumes available (scratch/empty)?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Zoltan
Forray
Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 11:24 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] No space available in storage pool failure but
No way of knowing. This server is backed-up "every so often" by the owner
and then usually multiple terabytes over several days.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Rick Adamson
wrote:
> Zoltan,
>
> Could it be that the amount of data that the backup is attempting to store
> exceeds the amount of
I already considered that. The tape pool is defined at 1500-scratch and
only 920-are used:
11:22:33 AM PROCESSOR : show sspool
-> Pool ARCHIVEPOOL(2): Strategy=10, ClassId=0, ClassName=DISK,
Next=6, ReclaimPool=0, HighMig=90, LowMig=70, MigProcess=1,
Access=0,
MaxSize=0, Cache
Hi Zoltan!
Try this one: issue a "show sspool" command. If the sum of NumScratchVols and
NumRsvdScratch equals your total amount of scratch tapes, you're probably hit
by this APAR: http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg1IC77685
I have bine there, either raise your maxscratch value or b
Zoltan,
Could it be that the amount of data that the backup is attempting to store
exceeds the amount of available storage space in the pool?
Recall that before sending the data the backup validates with the server that
there is sufficient space to store the data. If I recall correctly that numbe
Long shot...Maybe this could help:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21684682
...
This problem is seen for an almost full (sequential) storage pool as
well as for a pool that has enough space available.
If the storage pool gets full while a backup/archive operation is
running, it
No, the pool wasn't full before it started and it still isn't full.
All tape drives are available for the NEXTPOOL and were available when this
error occurred at 6am today.
This pool uses fixed DISK volumes, not FILEDEV class.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Efim wrote:
> Hi,
> You can get th
I should have mentioned that no, I do not set file size limits:
9:12:03 AM PROCESSOR : q stg backuppool f=d
Storage Pool Name: BACKUPPOOL
Storage Pool Type: Primary
Device Class Name: DISK
Storage Type: DEVCLASS
Hi,
You can get this error if the storage pool gets full during backup (no scratch
tapes, mount points).
If this pool is full before backup starts - it will go to the next storage pool.
Mark this pool as readonly and start backup. it will switch to the tape (next
storage pool).
Efim
> 18 июля 2
Could be a huge sparse file if you have Maximum Size Threshold set for
the pool?
Regards,
--
Sasa Drnjevic
www.srce.unizg.hr
On 18.7.2017. 14:48, Zoltan Forray wrote:
> TSM Linux server 7.1.6.3. Client is Linux 7.1.6.4.
>
> This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" whe
TSM Linux server 7.1.6.3. Client is Linux 7.1.6.4.
This morning at 6am is the second time I have had this "failure" when it
isn't true.
ANR0522W Transaction failed for session 19482 for node VCU-GS1.CHPC.VCU.EDU
(Linux x86-64) - no space available in storage pool BACKUPPOOL and all
successor poo
Thanks for the verification. We have successfully increased tsmarchlog.
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 3:57 AM, Giacomo Testa
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There shouldn't be any issues extending the logical volume using lvextend,
> and extending the filesystem on this logical volume, using the appropriate
> files
Hi to all
Need a little help with this script below , need to get the summary amount
backup result for the node .
Now I got a lot of entries from this script as:
Protect: POSTBACK>run q_obj_0 IHPPROD_ORA
Nodename Date (D/M/Y) Begin timeEnd time
Elapsed time
23 matches
Mail list logo