This bit me too in our test environment, though the DB upgrade worked, but
it later tanked and could not be restarted.
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:15 AM, Rainer Tammer
wrote:
> Hello,
> Is this mentioned in the docs?
>
> That would be a bit difficult in our setup:
>
>
David,
Could you please provide a link for that requirement? We have asked IBM a
number of times, and they are fairly nebulous on what the actual
requirements are. That is a very interesting list you have there, thanks.
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Nixon, Charles D. (David) <
ammer II
> Technology Services Group
> Carilion Clinic
> 451 Kimball Ave.
> Roanoke, VA 24015
> Phone: 540-224-3903
> cdni...@carilionclinic.org
>
> Our mission: Improve the health of the communities we serve.
>
>
>
> ____
> From: A
Is this a scheduled session? There is another setting, maxschedsessions,
that controls the percentage of the total sessions that can be scheduled
sessions. If that is set really low (like 2%, seems unlikely now that I
think about it), then that would be the 4 sessions.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at
This can be done. I have tested copying the DB2 files, wiping away,
create new DB2 instance, copy files back. The main thing to watch is
the permissions. One little wrong permission, and DB2 won't start.
If you want to see my procedures, email me and I will dig them out.
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at
I saw behaviour like this when I had 2 DB volumes, and added 2 more on
the fly. After talking with IBM, I tried a restart, and that didn't
help. What I had to do was restore the database to all 4 volumes. If
you had all 4 volumes there from the start, then I would open a PMR
with IBM.
On Fri,
The first thing I would check, is that you have full volumes that are
10% full (90% reclaimable), which is what the 90 in your command
specifies.
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 14:30, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
TSM 6.3
Our first drop stgpool uses devclass of disk, our next stgpool coded is
I would be interested too. I am just trying to set it up myself.
On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 01:24, Christian Svensson
christian.svens...@cristie.se wrote:
Hi Jim,
I will send you a powerpoint presentation I present at Tivoli User Group
(Sweden) how you setup TIP and ITM for TSM.
But answer to
I ran into this issue with 6.2.2 and ultimately, after talking with
IBM, I had to do a dump/restore to have it start using the space. I
would get ahold of IBM and see if they have figured out a different
way to do this.
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 08:34, Ehresman,David E.
deehr...@louisville.edu
dsmc -se=
where is a server defined in dsm.sys
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 15:01, Tim Brown tbr...@cenhud.com wrote:
Is there an override in the linux backup command to access a different dsm.sys
As there is in windows
Windows
Dsmc inc -optile=dsm1.opt
Linux
./ dsmc inc
We had to recatlog the database after an upgrade from 6.2.2.0 to I
think it was 6.2.2.2 - I have a doc with the instructions, but I can't
get access to it from home for some readon :(
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 14:32, Abid Ilias ail...@uchicago.edu wrote:
Hello Carlo,
Answers are below...
Tape pools are not de-duped, so that is not a consideration.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 13:17, Mark Mooney mmoo...@aisconsulting.net wrote:
Hello,
I had a student ask me today What happens if you have collocation turned on
for a storage pool that you are deduplicating? I did not know what to
I know this is a silly question, but since it's comm wait, did you
have the nic's checked that they were running at the correct speed
with no errors?
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 09:30, Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com wrote:
Not backing up system state. And all firewalls turned off.
We're seeing
Hi.
We have been monitoring our instances for some time by connectiong,
doing a command, and exiting. We ran into a situation with an AIX
hang, where the connection was made, but then the scripts hung because
nothing came back. How are you checking for instance availability,
and TSM server
This would work for existing volumes, but if it's uses a scratch pool,
it could still try to create volumes.
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 09:05, Prather, Wanda wprat...@icfi.com wrote:
Well if nothing else, this will surely do it:
update vol * wherestgpool=filepoolname access=readonly
For DR purposes, I would like to be able to restore a TSM instance
from one machine to another. With V6, and DB2, this has become a
little harder. I have tried to devise my own process, but I have run
into a permission problem. When I try to start TSM, I get ANR0186E
There is insufficient
I/O because that won't be
restored with the mksysb... then the drm file pretty much works like a
charm.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 10:52 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject
Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2011 1:05 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Restore of TSM V6 DB on another machine
I guess I should have mentioned this, but unfortunately this is not an
inactive machine waiting for restore.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:32, Dwight Cook
I am having the same problem, but have not inquired of IBM yet,
because I am already working a backup db problem with TSM support.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 15:42, Pagnotta, Pam (CONTR)
pam.pagno...@hq.doe.gov wrote:
Hello,
Would someone please tell me if they are seeing ANR0293I and ANR0294I
We hit this limit. I don't think it matters the size of the DB as
much as the number of clients. I don't have an exact count, but we
must have been closeto 1000 sessions if not a little more.
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 10:11, John Monahan
john.mona...@us.logicalis.com wrote:
IBM Advanced Technical Support
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Andrew Carlson naclos...@gmail.comwrote:
While I was researching a problem we had, I came across something that
said DB2 reorgs were different in v6.2 than v6.1. Almost like there
were no DB2 table reorgs in v6.2. Of course
While I was researching a problem we had, I came across something that
said DB2 reorgs were different in v6.2 than v6.1. Almost like there
were no DB2 table reorgs in v6.2. Of course, either I didn't bookmark
it, or I can't find it. Our database is growing faster than I thought
it would, so I
://www.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=swg21452146
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2011 1:54 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] The State of DB2 Reorgs in TSM
While I
It may be an annoyance for testing on a very small database, but
would'nt you want a warning if your database was running out of space
in a production TSM environment?
On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 09:57, Remco Post r.p...@plcs.nl wrote:
Hi,
while testing with TSM and trying to build a sensible
Gary,
It is a little confusing - even IBM doesn't always understand. The
TSM DB system tables are located under the instance directory. So,
for instance, if your instance is named tsm1, most likely the DB is in
/home/tsm1/tsminst1. The DB name is TSMDB1.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 08:31, Lee,
Has anyone gotten
ANR2984E Database backup terminated due to environment or setup issue related
to DSMI_CONFIG - DB2 sqlcode -2033 sqlerrmc 406
from a database backup? We upgrade from 6.2.1.1 to 6.2.2 last week
because of a problem, and we haven't gotten a DB backup since. I have
a call in to
-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Thursday, January 13, 2011 5:19 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] ANR2984E
Has anyone gotten
ANR2984E Database backup terminated due to environment or setup issue related
Nevermind - I typoed the ANR message . . . Thanks a lot!
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 16:46, Andrew Carlson naclos...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Wanda. I swear I searched for ANR2984E on the IBM site and it
didn't come up. Did you search there, or did you know about this one?
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011
Hi all
I am running TSM 6.2.1.1 on AIX V615 in a LPAR on a P770. The LPAR
has 6 shared CPU's, 12 virtual CPU;s, and 64GB of memory. There are 2
VIO servers with 4 fiber channel connections to XIV storage for the DB
and LOG, and 2 10Gbit Ethernet in each VIO in an Etherchannel
configuration.
it's as good as 15k FC or SAS.
..Paul
On Oct 8, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Andrew Carlson naclos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
I am running TSM 6.2.1.1 on AIX V615 in a LPAR on a P770. The LPAR
has 6 shared CPU's, 12 virtual CPU;s, and 64GB of memory. There are 2
VIO servers with 4 fiber channel
Hi Folks.
I am running TSM 6.2.1.1 under AIX 6.1.5. I am writing data to a Data
Domain DD880 using NFS.
We have a long running DB2 backup that backs up about 7TB. By the
way, this is a fairly new setup. Most things are fine, but sometimes
I get:
DATE_TIME: 2010-10-06 11:32:11.00
I submitted a PMR, 82034. TSM 6.2 running on AIX 6.1.4.2, hanging on
shutdown, and hanging starting up after killing it. They say it looks
like PMR 80033, where they had to downgrade to AIX 6.1.2, which fixed
the hang. No info yet on why, or when a later fix will be available.
This is not
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] Namens Andrew
Carlson
Verzonden: woensdag 12 mei 2010 4:32
Aan: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Onderwerp: [ADSM-L] TSM 6.2 Slowness
I have been testing TSM 6.2 on a P570 P5 8 core 32GB box (I'm kinda
lucky right now
q content damaged=yes shows nothing also, just as q content showed nothing.
Is it possible, that since I had deduplication turned on, it turned
the files into chunks and it has way more chunks obviously than files,
and that's why it's taking so long? I never got any deduplication,
because the
I am running TSM 6.2 . . . with no maintenance.
On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Richard Sims r...@bu.edu wrote:
Andy - This might be APAR IC67982. You are running TSM 6.1 with no
maintenance, and looks like it needs some.
Richard Sims
--
Andy Carlson
It would probably not be a problem with it working, but with the two
lun's concatenated, there is probably little to no chance DB2 will be
able spread the I/O out among the 2 lun's. If it's in a separate
filesystem, DB2 will spread the data out across them. It will be even
worse with 3, 4, 5, or
I have been testing TSM 6.2 on a P570 P5 8 core 32GB box (I'm kinda
lucky right now to have that as a test box).
I am attending TSM 6.1 Advanced Admin and Tuning class right now, and
found out some stuff about Deduplication that I didn't know. So, I
went to delete all the filespaces in the
Could you explain why you feel the need to use disk pools vs
sequential disk files? We are going the route of sequential disk file
storage pools, and I haven't run across anything that would make me
want to keep disk pools for certain uses. Thanks a lot.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:48 AM, Steven
I have been looking through the commands and outputs of commands,
trying to find something to tell me how much deduplication has
occurred. Is there one there I am missing? Thanks.
--
Andy Carlson
---
Server side dedup, Server V6.2, client V6.2.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mark Yakushev bar...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Andy,
Are you doing server- or client-side deduplication? What are the versions
of your TSM Client and Server?
Regards,
Mark L. Yakushev
From: Andrew Carlson naclos
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 4:13 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Deduplication Status
Server side dedup, Server V6.2, client V6.2.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mark
I totally agree on this. At one time, we had such a time with offsite
reclamation, we would set it to 99, then have a script run checking for
reclamation processes, and bump the number down by 1 if there were none. A
hack, to be sure, but we eventually caught up.
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 8:31
Could you share those reasons? I would be interested because we tested one,
and the NFS seemed to work great. Thanks.
On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Howard Coles howard.co...@ardenthealth.com
wrote:
Thanks. I don't want to do the NFS stuff with TSM for a few reasons,
but this helps.
I am not an expert in this area, but I have been told by a number of Dedup
vendors that compressed data cannot be deduped. YMMV, but it seems correct
to me, because small changes in the file could potentially change much of a
compressed file, depending on the compression method used.
On Sat, Nov
Sorry, meant to say defaults to filedata=no.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Andrew Carlson naclos...@gmail.com wrote:
It looks like the filedata parameter defaults to filedata=all. You either
need to say filedata=all or look at that parameter in the help and decide
what you need. If you
It looks like the filedata parameter defaults to filedata=all. You either
need to say filedata=all or look at that parameter in the help and decide
what you need. If you have that, then it might be time to call IBM.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Richard Mochnaczewski
Will a TSM v5.4 talk to a tsm V6 library manager then?
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Mikael Lindstrom
mikael.lindst...@se.ibm.com wrote:
Nope, you need to be on 6.1 level on the Library Manager.
Prepared by IBM Attorney - IBM Confidential
Do you have any spare disk storage at all? If you do, you could start
staging some of the more important restores to disk using move nodedata.
On Jan 22, 2008 11:35 AM, Whitlock, Brett
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good Luck, Roger!
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager
This happened to me one time, Investigating with lsof and netstat showed
nothing, so we ended up rebooting.
On Jan 21, 2008 1:35 PM, Schneider, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
We had a TSM instance on a AIX 5.3ML1 server hang because of a
temporary disk problem (powerpath
I am running TSM 5.3.2.3 on AIX 5.3.6. We started using big disk pools for
our onsite data some time ago. We are noticing an odd behaviour. It takes
up to 20 minutes for disk volumes to start varying online, and can take
longer obviously for it to finish. Before opening an incident with IBM
could be severely fragmented.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2007 7:12 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Long Wait for Disk Pool Volumes
I am running TSM 5.3.2.3 on AIX 5.3.6. We
I believe that if they are marked as offsite, they will be reclaimed. If
not, for instance if you have them in an online remote library, you will
have to do the move data.
On 10/9/07, Nicholas Rodolfich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
Thanks for your help!!
I have TSM server 5.3.5 on AIX
Thedownside to this solution is that the new volumes have to match in size
to the old volumes - may not be a problem, but if you wanted to take this
chance to change the layout and size of the volumes, this solution would not
work.
On 8/13/07, Wojtek Pięcek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another
I'm sorry, I guess you didn't bother to read what he wrote. He was talking
about doing dbcopy volumes, which have to be the same size (I believe any
extra is wasted if you make them bigger) as the primary volumes.
On 8/14/07, Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
no, the volumes you are
The way to do it with no downtime is to add the new volumes to the database,
then delete the old volumes (through TSM of course). TSM will then move the
data for each deleted volume to space in the new disks.
On 8/12/07, Norita binti Hassan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
How to move TSM
Could you elaborate on why the log should be in smaller volumes? I have
always heard the DB should, because it opens multiple threads with multiple
volumes, but since the log is sequentially written to for the most part, I
can't figure out why that should be in multiple volumes. Thanks.
On
Is this really a good answer? I know it's working as designed, as IBM is
sometimes fond of saying. TSM knows whats on what tapes. It seems like,
unless the processing required to do it would be substantial, TSM could
split the processes so this doesn't occur, at least as often. With
to the new
sequential access pool (which is to be done anyway) and have the your6TB in
the old random pool expired with the time.
Best
Juraj
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von
Andrew Carlson
Gesendet: Dienstag, 19. Juni 2007 19:45
There is a script called biggest.sh here:
http://www.unixreview.com/documents/s=9700/ur0504arevised/ur0504_script.html
that will do what you want I think.
On 6/20/07, Tim Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way in a script to display files in filespaces that are of a
certain size or
I would like to move about 6TB of data for a node from Random Access disk to
sequential accesss. Since move nodedata doesn't work on random access
pools, I was wondering if there is an easy way to do it. The data is
archive data, and the only plan I could come up with was moving data from
Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8:21 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Moving one nodes date from primary direct access disk
I would like to move about 6TB of data for a node from Random Access disk
to
sequential accesss. Since move nodedata
It's not our largest node by a long shot. We have several DB2 nodes that
are holding upwards of 15TB apiece, and a couple more in the 10TB range.
On 6/19/07, Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 19, 2007, at 11:20 AM, Andrew Carlson wrote:
I would like to move about 6TB of data
This is an idea I had not thought of. Thanks for the tip.
On 6/19/07, Thorneycroft, Doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you could export/import the node.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 8
One thing you could try, if you have a well defined directroy structure, is
do incrementals on lower level directories, one at a time. Something like a
script that has a list of dsm incrementals on directories, or you could even
generate the list from the directories.
On 5/30/07, Nicholas
We have a situation where we have two entries in our dsm.sys. One of the
entries contains an inclexcl that excludes certain database filesystems,
though the exlclude is using exclude not exclude.fs. The other has no
inclexcl, so that when the DB person runs their backup script, the files are
Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 10:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Expiring Files that Have Been Exluded
We have a situation where we have two entries in our dsm.sys. One of
the
entries contains an inclexcl
From searching the archives, it seems that TSM does not have a tape erasure
ability, but must be done outside of TSM. I understand TSM, and that there
is little to no need to erase a tape, but of course, management doesn't
always understand or believe that. Has anyone solved this problem, made
We tried file device class with our onsite pool with disappointing results.
I believe the problem was our decision not to stripe across LUN's. This
would have made performance much better, at the cost of a LUN failure
causing more damage than if we used them indicidually. Now, I can't
remember
I have recently changed my 3 TSM instances to use a collocated copypool in a
direct attached silo offsite. What I am seeing, is that TSM appears to be
using more tapes than it needs to. I have may 10 -15 tapes every day that
have may .2% utilization, but if I move that data, it doesn't mount a
Try auditing the volumes. If they are offsite, you will have to make them
readonly or readwrite. We have had volumes like these before - it doesn't
even mount the tape, it just fixes something in the database.
On 11/7/06, Rao, Kamran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
TSM 5.1.6.2 running on
I went through this same problem. Never got a satisfactory answer,
totally. It behaves differently depending on if you do it from a terminal,
or disconnected, like from cron. Also it depends on the setting of
sqldisplaymode. Try the command `set sqldisplaymode wide` and see if that
makes it
The only reason for this that I have run in to is that all of the data that
needs to be backed up is from one node. TSM will not currently create
multiple processes for a single node's data, which is pretty inefficient.
The same goes for migration, which used to bite us alot.
On 10/5/06, Scott
Is your interest in sharing the FC adapter so you can share disks? The problem
is, I do not believe that a tape library and tape drives are sharable in this
fashion. If you want to share disk, use separate FC adapter for this, shared
out through the virtual scsi of the vio server. Use
,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month,
The feeling of seeing the red box with the item you want in it:Priceless.
- Original Message
From: Richard Sims [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Andrew Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 18, 2006 5:07:20 PM
Subject: Re: Strange
19, 2006, at 10:10 AM, Andrew Carlson wrote:
Richard,
I think it was obvious, but maybe it wasn't. People don't normally
make their onsite disk pools into offsite status. When my copypool
tapes get full, I mark them offsite so that reclamation will read
the disk pool, not do reclamation
There is no next storagepool at this point, so it would be impossible for it to
migrate.
Andy Carlson
---
Gamecube:$150,PSO:$50,Broadband Adapter: $35, Hunters License: $8.95/month,
The feeling of seeing the red box with
I am running TSM 5.3.2.3 on an AIX (5.2.5) platform. We recently finished
migrating our onsite pool to disk only, and out offsite pool to directly
attached 3592 drives in a 3584 silo. We started getting multiple ANR1163I
messages. I started investigating this, and found an odd behaviour. If
Do the correct copy operation, then delete those tapes with discardd=yes.
Since they are in a copy storage pool, this is a safe operation - your primary
copy of the data will not be affected.
Andy Carlson
---
There are a couple of ways of doing this:
1) Create the new raw volumes, the same size as the JFS volumes, mirror each
volume, then break the JFS mirrir leaving the raw volume DB
2) Create the new raw volumes, any size you want. Define the raw volumes to
the database, then delete the old
What happens during a copy is that any data that has not been copied is
copied. So, for your example, the second copy on Tuesday morning will
copy all files that have changed since the copy ran on Monday. Think of
it more as a sync up than an incremental. For example, if a copy pool
tape gets
One thing to watch out for is to put the commit=yes on the restore
command. Otherwise, it was waiting for incremental to be applies over
the full restore.
--- Orville Lantto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What command did you use to restore the database?
Orville Lantto
Glasshouse Technologies,
I submitted this very request at Share about 4 years ago. I saw it on
one of the furtures lists, but I am not sure whether they construed my
request as what we got - copypool during session backup - or not. this
no longer concerns me as it did, because we have gone to a disk onsite
pool.
---
What do these commands do?
--- Josh-Daniel Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know how to tell how big the expiration table is?
The reason is that I ran CLEANUP EXPTABLE on Monday.
On one of my servers, it finished up almost immediately.
On the other, it's been running for almost
Is your log extrememly full? I have been told in the past that when the
DB backup ends, the log pages are appended on the back, and played back
if the DB is restored.
--- Brenda Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running a database backup that has been going for approx. 4
hrs.
now, it
of the other threads in use, our TSM server
would die at around 1800 active threads.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Random
I don't know what level you came from, but we had to put on 5.3.2.3 to
fix repair stgvol hanging TSM.
--- Lawrence Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just upgraded to 5.3.2 on our DR server.
Any required maintenance at this level?
Session established with server BACKUP: AIX-RS/6000
Server
nomigrrecl will stop migrations and reclamations, but as far as I know,
if you want to remove it, you have to stop and restart the server after
it is removed from the options file.
--- Nancy L Backhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24,
at around 1800 active threads.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2006 11:04 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools
I have heard in the past
I have heard in the past that random access disk pools can become
fragmented and practically unusable after a while. I was wondering
if anyone sees this in the real world? I posted the other day about
managing predefined volumes in a file type devclass, and the only
answer I got said they were
We bought enough disk to handle our onsite pool. I am currently
having my backups go directly to disk. The problem I am having, is
that TSM seems to select volumes based on sort order. What ends up
happening is that it selects volumes on the same hdisk, until those
are exhausted. This gives me
Has anyone ever seen ANR2997W cause a transacton failure? Here is a
snippet of my log:
03/08/06 14:39:10 ANR2997W The server log is 80 percent full. The
server
will delay transactions by 3 milliseconds.
(SESSION:
152212, PROCESS: 1586)
Hi.
TSM 5.3.2.3 running on AIX 5.2.5
Yesterday, after formatting about 8TB worth of volumes for a file device
class, I defined the volumes to my stgpool. I migrated some data there,
and let my backups run last night into the new 8TB space. When I
checked this morning, everything ran fine, but
We had a problem last night where out POSTSchedulecmd did not run.
Checking back, it turned out that between the time the client picked up
it's schedule, we had disabled sessions pending installation of an
emergency patch on TSM. What the client did was run the PREShedulecmd,
then found out the
for each server and see if it
shows uniform growth.
If not, drill down to node occupancies (num_files), and so on.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Carlson
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 2:39 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re
I saw something very like this. If I increase my bufpool size above
2GB, eventually TSM slows down to a crawl. I called IBM, and they tried
to send me to the performance group, so I just told them nevermind, I'll
put it back down to 2GB.
Matthew Glanville wrote:
Some lucky individual (me),
On November 11th, we upgraded our 3 tsm instances from 5.2.1 to
5.2.4.5. Since then, our three databases have grown at an alarming
rate. They have grown:
56GB to 75GB (33%, 19Gb growth)
46GB to 65GB (41%, 19Gb growth)
53GB to 63GB (18%, 10Gb growth)
Anyone have problems like this? Thanks.
I might have thought that too if it wasn't all 3 instances. I graphed my
database sizes back to 2004 (I have them in a mysql database), and it is
striking the growth curve since 11/12/2005.
Jack Coats wrote:
No unusual new clients being added? Retaining more data?
Change of include/exclude
Good question, I didn't think of that one. It does appear that
expiration is working (at least it says it is working - it is expiring
objects, and a fairly normal amount).
David Longo wrote:
Have your Expirations been running successfully?
David Longo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 01/25/06 2:05 PM
Is there a limit on the number of directories (filesystems) that can be
put in a file type device class in TSM 5.3? I looked in the Admin
Reference and Guide, and did not see it mentioned there. Thanks.
Allen S. Rout wrote:
I would think that the importance of contiguous placement would be very
strongly correlated with the disk tech. If I go to FILE devclasses on my SSA,
I would think preallocating would be indicated. If I were deplying on
something more abstracted (shark, netapp, etc) I
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo