As much as I do agree with the shrug issue at times, I fail to see where the
fact that restores take ages is actually connected to the Netware side.
We have exactly the same issue, and with all the "experts" we'v had here
testing it out, not one has been able to point to the Netware side being th
what the minimum requirements are. Sun makes these new machines
> called Blades. Some are as cheap as 1300usd and perform similar an
> Ultra60.
> We are trying a few of them out now. That wouldn't be such a large
> investment. Otherwise there is always next years budget.
>
nd but I believe that the BMR server
> itself is a separate server and requires Unix. BMR does not care what the
> TSM server is itself. Check the FAQ out on their site.
> http://www.tkg.com/bmr/tsm
>
> This looks promising!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: M
Ray,
Do you have some idea when you will have BRM that will work when the TSM
server is an NT server ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Schafer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â îàé 22 2001 15:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: bare metal restore for NT...
>
> Thank
server, and the TSM Clients and
> the TSM
> server. There is a FAQ available for BMR, as well as other documentation
> on the
> TKG website: http://www.tkg.com/bmr/tsm.
>
>
> Mike Glassman - Admin wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > We just had a meeting with our
All,
We just had a meeting with our support people for TSM, regarding finishing
the project we have.
To cut things short, one of the options we required was Bare Metal Restore
of NT and Unix servers.
Our TSM server sits on an NT server.
We were just informed (and this is what I want to ask abo
Andy,
Taking all you say into consideration, and fully understanding how hard it
is to do what we are asking (which in my opinion should have been a major
concern before shipping, and not afterwards), I am still unsatisfied.
I am not going to bash one software against another, but with all due
r
took over 6 months of Tivoli and
> Novell "working together" that resulted in Novell sending us a custom
> TSA.NLM that worked. Tivoli is just issuing Novell API calls, they didn't
> write the OS, only the backup software.
>
> Mark
>
>
> -Original Message
Mark,
I would say not actually.
The fact that the problems centralized around the TSA modules in many cases,
was based on the fact that TSM/ADSM versions changed, not the TSA modules.
In every case, Netware was the one to bring out a new TSA module (including
some that weren't in SP's) in order
In cases such as this, it is much more advisable to go the full
uninstall-reinstall route (after as you say, backing up the required files).
Duplicate entries in the registry under Control Panel, more then once also
refer to duplicate entries elswhere, so it's more then just a cosmetic.
Where it
accepting login parameters
>
> It is not asking for a NetWare ID, it is asking for a TSM nodename and
> node
> password. Look at what is in <>, this is the default...
>
> Mark
>
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Mike Glassman - Admin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
&
What do you mean by something adverse?
What symptoms ?
Are you using the latest TSA files from Novell ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Suad Musovich [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â îøõ 06 2001 0:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Netware/NAV-CE
>
> We are trying to fin
Anyone,
I have just installed the 4.1.1 Netware client on one of my servers, after
we shifted from ADSM to TSM server.
After I enter the line to start a scheduled backup, I get the following
prompt :
Please enter NetWare user for "nwserver":
In the previous clients, If this happened, I entered
Rename the filespacename where ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Jelle Komrij [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: á éðåàø 22 2001 15:44
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Novell Issues
>
> Marc,
>
> There seems to be an upgrade problem to long file name space with the
> 3.7.x
The answer is yes.
You need to define a storage pool for the BE on the TSM server.
See the module for this on the Veritas site.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacques Butcher [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â éðåàø 16 2001 8:34
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Backup Exec
Seth,
Which TSA versions are you using ? The ones from the SP or a later version ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Forgosh, Seth [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: ã éðåàø 03 2001 15:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Latest TSA's for Netware 5.1
>
> Latest TSAs do indeed
Rob,
Which version was suggested by Tivoli for this ?
Let me know and maybe I can get ahold of them, altho please remember that
any files that are not released by Novell, will not be fully supported, and
as such, any other issues you have due to using them, are on your own head.
If I can get th
Anyone,
I have just been given an offer for our new in progress TSM system.
The offer also includes clients for various OS's, such as Win9X, WinME,
Win2K (WS) at a cost.
I am a bit surprised at this, as I know I can dld the clients foe win32 for
free of the TSM site, so is our peovider BS'sing
All,
I have a user I am trying to remove from the list.
I have sent all the necessary commands to the listserv, but he is still
getting all the email.
Anyone know of who I can contact or how I can force remove him ?
He's about to leave and I do not want to get the emails to my Administrative
a
Larry,
If you perform a manual backup instead of a scheduled one, does it work ok ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Larry Way [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: â ðåáîáø 14 2000 18:37
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Netware
>
> We have recently upgrade of server to TSM 3.7.2.
ts of how TDP for Exchange works.
> If you are happy with Backup Exec, stay with it.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Del
>
> --------
>
> Del Hoobler
> IBM Corporation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Mike Glassman - Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 11/14/2000
> 07
>
> it is just a question of load, we backup more than 180 servers / night,
> bringing about 250 GB into our adsm server via network (in fact 2
> networks,
> production and service).
>
> Rene
>
> > -----Original Message-
> > From: Mike Glassman - Admin [
may contain information that is privileged and confidential.
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mike Glassman - Admin [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:59 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject
Del,
>From what you say it seems it should be a rather forwards sort of
backup-while-active and as easy to restore.
Yet in Rene's email of a short while ago today, it seems that he has to work
rather hard once the restore has been done.
I am very much questioning the need to drop BE and try the
Seems that a lot of you are happy with the exchange backup.
So let me ask if I may :
1. Do you backup Exchange while active or do you shut down the services
prior to backup ?
2. How many of you have had to restore your whole Exchange from backup, and
how long did it take, and did it work fully
y
>
> Andy Raibeck
> IBM/Tivoli
> Tivoli Storage Manager Client Development
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> "The only dumb question is the one that goes unasked."
>
>
> Mike Glassman - Admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/08/2000 02:45:42
>
> Please respond
All,
I just downloaded the TSM client for Windows (Intell) version as above, and
I noticed after the install, that even tho I told it I wanted to have the
administrative software installed as well, that it does not install and
administrative client.
Since I need this Administrative capability, a
All,
We are currently running ADSM on an AS400, with an attached 3494 (OS/2
internall OS) containing two internall 3590E tape drives.
We are checking to see if we should continue to use this current system, and
simply upgrade the ADSM system to the latest TSM version, or if it is better
to move
Using the client on a NW5.1 server (3 actually) with no issues so far, but
then, I don't use it to backup NDS at all.
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Brown [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: ã ñôèîáø 27 2000 19:59
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Novell and TSM version 3.7
that can trash any backup
> system's
> backup and restore times. In our case, thanks to raid, we do a lot more
> single file restores than restores of entire filesystems.
>
> Jim
>
> > --
> > From: Mike Glassman - Admin[SMTP:[EMAIL PRO
chnical Consultant
> Symatrix Technology, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Mike Glassman - Admin
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2000 11:58 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Slow resto
Kelly,
I don't know regarding Arcserve as you couldn't pay me to go near it, but BE
I do know.
Restore of a 600MB directory (talking small here) on ADSM to a Netware
server takes up to (no exageration here) 6 hours. And this is after we made
all sorts of changes (not me, our AS400 guy as that's
Tomas,
You have two options.
The one which is easiest is to start using the web access part of the ADSM
which will then allow you a graphical interface of sorts, and which is a
million times easier to work then the command line.
The second option is of course the command line, and then you have
These are NDS objects.
We get exactly the same issue showing when ours gets backed up, even tho we
know for a fact that the size of the files is much smaller.
We put it down to a quirk in ADSM.
By the way, we do NOT trust the ADSM NDS backups as a restore-able backup.
All our NDS backups are do
Can I run this client if my ADSM server is still at ADSM and hasn't been
moved to TSM yet ? Or is this only for environments running TSM on the
server as well ?
Mike
> -Original Message-
> From: Loon, E.J. van - SPLXM [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: a ieli 31 2000 14:17
> To: [EMAIL P
35 matches
Mail list logo
