We installed 12 LTO5 drives a couple of months ago We have a mixture of LTO2,
LTO4, and LTO5 drives in our library. LTO5 drives are only using LTO4 media,
but we haven't had any issues as of yet.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Ours is designed the same, I asked the same questions and was given the
following advice:
The alternative to specifying multiple database directories is to use hardware
RAID controller or LVM to assemble multiple disks into a single
filespace/directory, You don't get the benefit of DB2's stri
Ok, we've never collocated our copy pools because I was under the impression
that TSM consolidates each node to a small subset of tapes which in turn makes
restores very fast/less mounts blah blah blah, but if you're writing out new
backup data for each node from the night before out to a copypo
:13 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] copypool volumes requested instead of primary pool
On Jan 14, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Park, Rod wrote:
> ... why would it request the copypool if primary tape is available and
> read/writable in the library?
>
Rod -
The most common reason
We have a situation where dba's are doing a full db restore to a client.
The client is requesting and using primary tapes, but it is also
requesting copypool tapes that are offsite. All of the primary tapes are
online r/w in the library and some are actually in use that has the same
db file that th
I don't see anything in the activity log. The backups are going straight
to diskpools and the backups are single threaded. I did add disk space
to my diskpool this week in case that was the issue. Looking at my
diskvols, data doesn't seem to be striped across all disk evenly, would
that be that pro
I have a dba that has one sql server that has "tsm hang" issues
according to him. They have a full backup job that backs up 7 sql db's.
The size is about 80GB total. Sometime it backs them all up with no
issues, sometime it says "waiting on tsm server" but if I look at "q se"
there are no active se
I posted this before, not sure if it made it out there. I have a TSM
server version 5.3.3.1 on AIX with a 70GB database. I recently moved my
db/log vols from 500GB sata drives to internal drives along with
mirrored vols on separate internal drives on the aix box. My backups
went from 2 hours to 30
I have a TSM server version 5.3.3.1 running on AIX. Database is 70GB, I
recently moved the db and log vols off of 500GB SATA drives to internal
drives on the AIX box. I have the dbvols spread across 8 disks and
mirrored within TSM on 8 separate internal disks. Everything is much
faster now with the
Kinda weird...i had the exact same thing happen yesterday and I've never
seen it before either. We had to halt/restart to fix the problem..
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Mark Stapleton
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 11:35 AM
We might have a change in policy where we no longer need a 2nd copy of
certain storage pools. If this were the case, would it be ok for me to
just delete volume with discarddata=yes on those volumes, or when I
discarddata does that affect my primary tape pool also. Looks like I'll
be able to free u
I have a tsm server at level 5.3.3.1. I have a disk pool that does
migrations to tapepool for any data 90 days or older. I have been
getting the following message:
10/23/06 08:34:27 ANR1025W Migration process 109294 terminated
for storage
pool NT_DISKPOOL - insuffi
Yeh...i agree Joe. We have the same situation here. We have a 3583 with
LTO2 in a test/DR environment and it is painful to work with it, load
failures, locks up, you name it, just very inconsistent behavior. No
drive failures though and we have LTO2 in it. We also have a 3584 in our
production envi
We do a daily sysback to tape which also goes offsite which has all of
the DRM info and volhist,devconfig,dsmserv.dskall pertinent files
needed for restore.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Kauffman, Tom
Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2
I'm sure this has been discussed in past...the "dsmc sch" process
slowly has a memory leak over time and the only way to free it up is to
kill the process and let it respawn. We are at version 5.2.2.9 on AIX
5.3.3 Does anybody know if this has been fixed on any later versions of
the ba client...th
value...
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Park, Rod
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2006 2:31 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Migdelay explanation
Could someone in the group please explain to me how migdelay works. I
am wanting to setup a
Could someone in the group please explain to me how migdelay works. I
am wanting to setup a disk pool to migrate data 90 days old. I was under
the impression that when data was 90 days or older it would
automatically migrate to next pool. I was told that one thing that would
happen is, as soon as
anyone? Ideas?
-Original Message-
From: Park, Rod
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 7:10 AM
To: 'ADSM: Dist Stor Manager'
Subject: RE: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools
So, can someone explain the difference at the TSM level and aggregate
level. Really I'm trying to unders
k vs devclass=file
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Park, Rod
Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 10:39 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Random Access Disk Pools
Let me ask again because I didn't get much feedback. How do w
andom Access Disk Pools
We found the limit. There are some posts in this forum from the first
of the year about the problem we ran into.
Andy Huebner
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Park, Rod
Sent: Monday, March 27, 2006 6:45 AM
To: A
I believe ServerGraph and TSMManager both say they have the
functionality. We have a pretty sizable TSM environment here...3 TSM
servers 10TB b/u a night, 3584 1700 slots 60 drives and we do not have
scripts to do any of the daily housekeeping. We use tsm scripts and
scheduler and it runs fine. Wha
Andy,
That's interesting. Did this level actually fix your problem. We are at
5.3.2.3 and still have the repair stgvol problem. We have on open pmr
with them, but supposedly there is still an open apar to address repair
stgvol. We had this problem again just yesterday.really a pain
because it d
We use random access pools, how do you know what your thread limit
iswe've never had any issues with ours but we're thinking about
adding a lot more. What's the biggest reason you do/don't use
devclass=file over disk storage poolsarguments either way?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM:
Sorrythat was a typo on previous message, we have a 3584, not a
3589.
> _
> From: Park, Rod
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 7:53 AM
> To: 'ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU'
> Subject: 5.3.2.2 volume question
>
>
I recently upgraded to 5.3.2.2 server level, about 2 1/2 weeks ago. I
have 2 tsm servers, tsm1 and tsm2, each share a 3589 library with 5
frames 60 drives. tsm1 is the library manager. We have been noticing
lately that when we run a report to show private, scratches, dbb vols,
we have a column of
Hello all,
I recently upgrade my tsm servers to AIX 5.3 ML1 running tsm 5.2.3.3
since our aix upgrade, our database backups went from 20-35 minutes per
server to about 2-4 hrsanybody else experienced this and any
suggestions? This is the only significant event that has happened to
lead me to be
Just curious Why would you not do an audit DB and what all does an audit
DB do?
-Original Message-
From: Henrik Wahlstedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 8:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TSM migration from 5.1 to 5.2
No!
I would not do an audit db
Right now we have about 800 clients and to do a restore, the password is
the same for all clients. How are others doing this. We don't want to be in
the business of password generation/maintenance to change passwords all the
time. We also don't want just anybody being able to do a restore on any b
28 matches
Mail list logo
