Re: CPU Utilization

2004-11-15 Thread David McClelland
Operations Backup and Recovery Projects Shared Infrastructure Development Reuters 85 Fleet Street London EC4P 4AJ -Original Message- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Lee Sent: 10 November 2004 18:50 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

Re: CPU Utilization

2004-11-10 Thread Jason Lee
Hi there, yes, we've disabled HT in the BIOS. Other boxes see "4" CPUS. Thanks jason On Nov 10, 2004, at 10:44 AM, Neil Schofield wrote: Jason I've got to start by saying I know nothing about Linux so take this with a pinch of salt but... The Generation 3 (& Generation 4?) DL380 has hyper-threadi

Re: CPU Utilization

2004-11-10 Thread Neil Schofield
Jason I've got to start by saying I know nothing about Linux so take this with a pinch of salt but... The Generation 3 (& Generation 4?) DL380 has hyper-threading Intel processors, so each physical processor appears as two virtual processors. Your dual processor system should therefore appear as

CPU utilization

2004-11-10 Thread Jason Lee
Hi, I'm running TSM server 5.2.3 on an HP DL380 (Dual 3.2Ghz) with RedHat AS 3.0. What I'm finding is that no matter what load I put on the machine, TSM will not use more than 49.9% of the available CPU, even when there are idle cycles to be had... Here's a typical "top" 09:10:09 up 6 days, 2

Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100%

2002-12-13 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
n is performed on the client side. During backups you will notice CPU utilization peak because the client is doing much more work to get that data compressed before it's sent to the server. I have watched while backups are running and seen some low CPU usage and some high, depending on the numbe

Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100%

2002-12-13 Thread John Naylor
Bertrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/13/2002 04:24:32 PM Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: John Naylor/HAV/SSE) Subject: Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100% Geoff, I am experiencing the same problem and my se

Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100%

2002-12-13 Thread Mark Bertrand
, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 13, 2002 9:58 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100% > How can i bring the CPU > utilization down to lower levels? Check if compression is on or off. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support En

Re: TSM client CPU utilization 100%

2002-12-13 Thread Gill, Geoffrey L.
> How can i bring the CPU > utilization down to lower levels? Check if compression is on or off. Geoff Gill TSM Administrator NT Systems Support Engineer SAIC E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: (858) 826-4062 Pager: (877) 905-7154

TSM client CPU utilization 100%

2002-12-13 Thread Raghu S
Hi Greetings, I am receiving complaints from clients that CPU utilization of TSM clients ( Winodws NT 4.0, Win 2 K,Win 98 &95) is shooting up to 100% during the time of scheduled backup. Due to this , end users are feeling the system is hanging up and they are either stopping the Client ser

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-09 Thread Richard Sims
% idle. > When a TSM incremental starts up the CPUs are 0-5% idle. > Some of the hdisks are 100% busy and I/O wait is > 80%. > I'm not the actual admin of the machine, just a TSM resource > who is getting posed the question and am not sure what things > to look at for high C

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-08 Thread arhoads
e 100% busy and I/O wait is > 80%. > I'm not the actual admin of the machine, just a TSM resource > who is getting posed the question and am not sure what things > to look at for high CPU utilization issues. > > James > > >From: Steve Schaub <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-08 Thread James Thompson
ental starts up the CPUs are 0-5% idle. Some of the hdisks are 100% busy and I/O wait is > 80%. I'm not the actual admin of the machine, just a TSM resource who is getting posed the question and am not sure what things to look at for high CPU utilization issues. James >From: Stev

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-08 Thread Steve Schaub
be your problem but it's worth a check. Steve Schaub Haworth, Inc email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/07 5:04 PM >>> Hello, Has anyone dealt with high CPU utilization problems on an AIX SP node? Were you able to do anything to reduce the CPU utilization? This

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-08 Thread Ganu Sachin, IBM
] Regards Sachin Ganu IBM Global Services ( India ) > -Original Message- > From: James Thompson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 3:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory > > Hello,

Re: High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-07 Thread George Lesho
tivity. If it is below 98 percent or so when you are experiencing the cpu utilization issues, you might want to bump your BUFPOOLSIZE paramter in your dsmserv.opt file. I would suggest doubling your current value and watching your cache hit percentage for a few days. Your cache hit percentage shou

High CPU utilization on AIX SP node with 1 gig memory

2001-02-07 Thread James Thompson
Hello, Has anyone dealt with high CPU utilization problems on an AIX SP node? Were you able to do anything to reduce the CPU utilization? This happens during incremental backups. Other less powerful (fewer procesors) machines with less memory do not experience this issue. Are there any commands

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-19 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bill.Colwell[bcolwell]@DRAPER.COM Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM.Dist.Stor.Manager[ADSM-L]@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization Darlene, you were the victim of a bug; I am attaching the apar below. This bug bit me once too. I didn't recogni

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-19 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
Mon, 18 Sep 2000 16:57:00 -0400 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Bill.Colwell[bcolwell]@DRAPER.COM Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM.Dist.Stor.Manager[ADSM-L]@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization Darlene, you were the victim of a bug; I am attaching the apar below. This bug b

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-18 Thread Bill Colwell
depending upon the state and usage of the memory. - - - In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 09/18/00 at 04:57 PM, Darlene E Wnukowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >Good news! I have been running for a week with rewritten ADSM backup scripts >and my CPU utilization has not gone above 10%

Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-18 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
Good news! I have been running for a week with rewritten ADSM backup scripts and my CPU utilization has not gone above 10% of our 7060-H50. Most of the time it's under 5%. I rewrote my daily ADSM backup scripts to remove the parameter "wait=yes". I had to break the scripts up to do

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-08 Thread Bill Colwell
hu, 7 Sep 2000 13:12:00 -0400 >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: Bill.Colwell[bcolwell]@DRAPER.COM >Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Reply-To: ADSM.Dist.Stor.Manager[ADSM-L]@VM.MARIST.EDU >Subject: Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization >John, >TAPEIOBUFS came in with 3.7. All my storage pools are

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-08 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
- From: Darlene E Wnukowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cut MVS CPU Utilization I have been able to cut the MVS TSM server's use of CPU from a high of 60% of a 7060-H50 to under 10% of a 7060-H50 during backup of tape s

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
TED] Reply-To: ADSM.Dist.Stor.Manager[ADSM-L]@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization John, TAPEIOBUFS came in with 3.7. All my storage pools are on stk 9840s but they are emulating 3490's. I have tapeiobufs set to 9 anyway; after the storage pools were in use, we got some 9840

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Bill Colwell
//www.cis.corp.inside.tkr/networkstorage/ >Ask me about free firewood! >-Original Message- >From: Darlene E Wnukowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:26 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Cut MVS CPU Utilization >I have been able to cut

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Richard Sims
>Does anyone know when the TAPEIOBUFS parameter was introduced to *SM? I did >a search of my ADSM 3.1 documentation and didn't find this parameter. I see >the PTF on IBMLINK and it looks like, maybe, 3.7. Can anyone confirm? I >could really use some CPU relief on OS390 with ADSM 3.1. The quick ch

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
: John.G.Talafous[Talafous]@TIMKEN.COM Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: ADSM.Dist.Stor.Manager[ADSM-L]@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization Does anyone know when the TAPEIOBUFS parameter was introduced to *SM? I did a search of my ADSM 3.1 documentation and didn't find this parameter. I se

Re: Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Talafous, John G.
ene E Wnukowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2000 11:26 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Cut MVS CPU Utilization I have been able to cut the MVS TSM server's use of CPU from a high of 60% of a 7060-H50 to under 10% of a 7060-H50 during backup of tape storage pools

Cut MVS CPU Utilization

2000-09-07 Thread Darlene E Wnukowski
I have been able to cut the MVS TSM server's use of CPU from a high of 60% of a 7060-H50 to under 10% of a 7060-H50 during backup of tape storage pools. I did it by changing two parameters in the server parameter file. One of them, TXNGROUPMAX, is not the one that made the difference but I am incl