---Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Cameron Hanover
> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 5:10 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: [ADSM-L] empty offsite volume can't be reclaimed
>
> Before I go calling in some of
.
If not you may have to open a PMR.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Cameron Hanover
Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2013 5:10 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] empty offsite volume can't be reclaimed
Before I go
For
> example:
>
> From the activity log, when attempting to reclaim:
> 12/22/13 15:21:46 ANR1163W Offsite volume 701339 still contains files
> which could not be moved. (PROCESS: 5426)
>
> tsm: TSM-ELAENIA>q vol 701339
>
> Volume Name Storage
wo
where the source volumes are suspect, I'm still looking into that. But there
is certainly more than one that is, as best I can tell, empty. For example:
From the activity log, when attempting to reclaim:
12/22/13 15:21:46 ANR1163W Offsite volume 701339 still contains files which
cou
Bill,
Did you ever get this resoved? I'm guessing that the tape you're trying to do
move data on has a file split across tapes and you don't have one of those
tapes onsite. So it goes to the primary pool instead to find the data.
David Ehresman
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/16/05 9:26 PM >>>
TSM
What does it look like when you "q med 001360..."? I have
seen a cart that's been checked in show up as "mountable not
in library".
Original message
>Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:05:48 -0400
>From: William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: [
SM-L] Move data for offsite volume
Did that, got the tee-shirt. This is one of the volumes, it's in my library and
access is read-only...
tsm: TSM>q vol 001360 f=d
Volume Name: 001360
Storage Pool Name: 3584CPPOOL
Device Class Name: 3584CLAS
MAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Stapleton,
Mark
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2005 9:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: Move data for offsite volume
Because checking in a tape with CHECKIN that was checked out with MOVE DRM
still has "offsite" as its access. You need to run
u
-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
>Subject: Move data for offsite volume
>
>TSM server 5.2.4.4 on AIX 5.2
>
>Due to a capacity "issue" with my libraries, some of my onsite
>primary pool tapes are not resident in my library. So to reclaim my
>offsite tapes, I've been checking in ta
TSM server 5.2.4.4 on AIX 5.2
Due to a capacity "issue" with my libraries, some of my onsite primary pool
tapes are not resident in my library. So to reclaim my
offsite tapes, I've been checking in tapes that have 90% reclamable space and
doing a move data on them. I've noticed a couple times
wh
;
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 8:57 PM
Subject: [ADSM-L] delete offsite volume - did not go to a pending status
Hey all -
I've been doing a little cleanup of some offsite tapes
- long story - but bascially I'm doing some "delete
volume discard=yes". Ran one today on a ta
gt; T. Lists
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:42 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: Re: delete offsite volume - did not go to a
> pending status
>
>
> Can't - it's offsite.
>
> --- "Ford, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
&
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:59 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: delete offsite volume - did not go to a pending status
Thought I had to physically have the tape onsite in
the library to run an audit volume. Doesn't it mount
the tape?
--- David E Ehresman <[EMAIL PROTECTED
> This usually takes care of
> > it. Sometimes you have to run the delete volume a
> > couple of times.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Phillip
> > 320-4462
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: T. List
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:58 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: delete offsite volume - did not go to a
> pending status
>
>
> Hey all -
>
> I've been doing a little cleanup of some offsite
> tapes
> - long story - but bascially I
Behalf Of
T. Lists
Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:42 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: delete offsite volume - did not go to a pending status
Can't - it's offsite.
--- "Ford, Phillip" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Try an audit volume on it and see what happens.
hillip
> 320-4462
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: T. Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 1:58 PM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
> Subject: delete offsite volume - did not go to a
> pending status
>
>
> Hey all -
>
> I'
@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: delete offsite volume - did not go to a pending status
Hey all -
I've been doing a little cleanup of some offsite tapes
- long story - but bascially I'm doing some "delete
volume discard=yes". Ran one today on a tape,
and for some reason the tape did not go to a p
Hey all -
I've been doing a little cleanup of some offsite tapes
- long story - but bascially I'm doing some "delete
volume discard=yes". Ran one today on a tape,
and for some reason the tape did not go to a pending
status. It's still at a full status. I did get all
the other messages about i
56
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Auditing Offsite volume
I have a volume in my copypool that is a problem
it is access=offsite
location=vault
it will not reclaim and if I try to delete it, it say it is e
rator
Selective Insurance Co. of America
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(973) 948-1306
-Original Message-
From: Bill Fitzgerald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 9:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Auditing Offsite volume
I have a volume in my copypool that is a problem
I have a volume in my copypool that is a problem
it is access=offsite
location=vault
it will not reclaim and if I try to delete it, it say it is empty offsite and can not
be delete
I know that there is a way to Audit this volume while it is still offsite
how do I do that?
Bill
William Fitz
I have a TSM 5.1.x server where I have a handful of tapes. They are a part
of an offsite storage pool. I do not have the onsite storage pool tapes. If
I try to do a restore of this data, TSM tries to mount the onsite tapes.
What should I do to get TSM to ask for the offsite ones? Don't I just set
t
Update the vol to access=readwthen try the restore again.
-Original Message-
From: Marc Lowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 5:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: unable to restre from offsite volume
Hi,
I am trying to restore a file from an offsite
003 12:11
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: Re: AW: unable to restre from offsite volume
>
>
> All the disk volumes are offline (should this matter?), the
> storage pools
> are all access = readwrite.
>
> I am restoring this data after performing a DR and re
we maintain.
Marc.
"Salak Juraj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
30-Jul-2003 10:51
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ADSM-L
cc:
S
cern as well
if it is not set to "unavailable".
No more ideas, this kind of stuff usually works flaweless ;=8)
regards
juraj
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marc Lowers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Juli 2003 11:13
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: unable to re
cc:
M.COM> Subject: Re: Offsite Volume sort of
missing.
Sent by:
"ADSM: Dist
Stor Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RIST.EDU>
12/11/01
Since there is data on the tape, you won't be able to check it in as
Scratch, you'll have to do it as Private. Then you can check the tape out
as normal.
Nick Cassimatis
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Today is the tomorrow of yesterday.
I have a strange phenomenon that occurred with one of my offsite tapes. The
tape was written on the 9th as you can see below. It was supposed to be
checked out on the morning of the 10th but it was not. All data points to it
being what it says it is yet I can't figure out why this happened. mtlib
Try this:
Q DRM volser
MOVE DRM volser wherest=Vaultretrieve tost=onsiteretrieve
-Original Message-
From: Gill, Geoffrey L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Offsite Volume sort of missing.
I have a strange phenomenon
>The command failed with the following message:
>
>ANRD ASVOL(2751): Volume 600206 cannot be deleted to
> SCRATCH - it still has SEGMENT references.
>Attempts to run the 'audit volume' command again fail because the
>access is offsite. Attempts to change the access to read/write or
>read-only
Quoting "Prather, Wanda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Bring the volume back (it's empty, anyway). Check it in, run AUDIT
> VOL FIX=YES. That usually fixes this problem.
I had the volume retrieved from the vault and inserted into the
tape library. TSM under OS/390 does not have a check-in procedure
of
use delete vol xxx discard=yes force=yes
-Original Message-
From: bbullock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Offsite volume in strange state
Hmm, we have about a dozen tapes in this state that are empty but not empty.
We
Bring the volume back (it's empty, anyway). Check it in, run AUDIT VOL
FIX=YES.
That usually fixes this problem.
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Denier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 4:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Offsite volume in strange state
TED]]
> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 2:37 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Offsite volume in strange state
>
>
> Our TSM server log for yesterday afternoon shows many pairs of
> messages like the following:
>
> 14:00:21 ANRD AFMIGR(2967): Space reclamation terminat
Our TSM server log for yesterday afternoon shows many pairs of
messages like the following:
14:00:21 ANRD AFMIGR(2967): Space reclamation terminated for volume
600206 - unexpected result code (1).
14:00:21 ANR1092W Space reclamation terminated for volume 600206 -
internal se
37 matches
Mail list logo
