On 27 okt 2009, at 01:09, Steven Harris wrote:
Allen,
I see your point on the hardware side, but what about all the various
flaky driver issues with Linux. Would it be reasonable to consider
Intel/Solaris to get an industrial strength OS on commodity hardware?
and you thought that
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:09:05 +1100, Steven Harris st...@stevenharris.info
said:
Would it be reasonable to consider Intel/Solaris to get an
industrial strength OS on commodity hardware?
Meh, Solaris. also-ran? Solaran.. ? I know that's blasphemy in some
circles, but Sun is not even a
: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
Caterpillar: Confidential Green Retain Until: 26/11/2009
Allen,
I see your point on the hardware side, but what about all the various
flaky driver issues
driver folks caught up. Now they supply the tape drivers as source and
you do an rpmbuild.
From:
Steven Langdale steven.langd...@cat.com
To:
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Date:
10/27/2009 01:47 PM
Subject:
Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
Sent by:
ADSM: Dist Stor Manager ADSM-L
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:57:20 +0330, Mehdi Salehi
iranian.aix.supp...@gmail.com said:
According to IBM, AIX outperforms Linux on the same box between 5%
to 10%. Maturity, flexibility and reliability of AIX and POWER
architecture in my opinion make it a far better choice for such a
Allen,
I see your point on the hardware side, but what about all the various
flaky driver issues with Linux. Would it be reasonable to consider
Intel/Solaris to get an industrial strength OS on commodity hardware?
Where's AIX for Intel when you need it!
Regards
Steve
Steven Harris
AIX and
challenges.
Once and for all.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On
Behalf Of Paul Zarnowski
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
Kelly,
At 11:27 AM 10/23
On 23 okt 2009, at 00:13, Dury, John C. wrote:
We are currently running TSM server v5530 under AIX. The AIX server
has a mixture of different speed (266mhz and 133mhz, both 64bit) PCI-
X slots. With 4 4g HBAs. Our system is connected to a Clariion
CX3-80 where the TSM DB and Recovery Log and
According to IBM, AIX outperforms Linux on the same box between 5% to 10%.
Maturity, flexibility and reliability of AIX and POWER architecture in my
opinion make it a far better choice for such a critical service. (I am not
against Intel)
I wonder why you don't configure lan-free scenario instead
of SAN disks for all of the TSM servers after
that.
Jerry Michalak
jerry_...@yahoo.com
From: Dury, John C. jd...@duqlight.com
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Sent: Thu, October 22, 2009 5:13:23 PM
Subject: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
We
# IMNSHO, IBM pSeries hardware is the best there is for large I/O
# workloads. I've seen AIX do things that Linux wouldn't survive.
I've always wondered about this. We have p570s and we can throw anything
at them, and they won't even breath hard.
But if you spent $100K on p-series, and $100K on
On Oct 23, 2009, at 4:27 AM, Mehdi Salehi wrote:
According to IBM, AIX outperforms Linux on the same box between 5%
to 10%. ...
Well, there is a single AIX product, but many versions of Linux
(unfortunately). Without a citation for the claim, it's not clear
that the assertion is true. A
.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Shawn
Drew
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 8:58 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
# IMNSHO, IBM pSeries hardware is the best there is for large I/O
Kelly,
At 11:27 AM 10/23/2009, Kelly Lipp wrote:
If one reads the IBM documentation on the latest x3850/x3950 M2 one will
observe that the data paths within that architecture are actually faster than
in the latest pSeries hardware.
I'm curious - does your analysis include the number of busses
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
Kelly,
At 11:27 AM 10/23/2009, Kelly Lipp wrote:
If one reads the IBM
STORServer solves your data backup challenges.
Once and for all.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX
Manager [mailto:ads...@vm.marist.edu] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 12:43 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
Kelly,
At 11:27 AM 10/23/2009, Kelly Lipp wrote:
If one reads the IBM documentation on the latest x3850/x3950
] On Behalf Of Paul
Zarnowski
Sent: Friday, October 23, 2009 2:48 PM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Performance and migration: AIX vs Linux
I didn't read the whole thing, but it looks like there are only 7 I/O slots?
Does it have RIO drawers similar to the higher end pSeries
We are currently running TSM server v5530 under AIX. The AIX server has a
mixture of different speed (266mhz and 133mhz, both 64bit) PCI-X slots. With 4
4g HBAs. Our system is connected to a Clariion CX3-80 where the TSM DB and
Recovery Log and Disk Storage pools live. The disk parts of TSM
- John C. Dury jd...@duqlight.com wrote:
1.How hard is it to move from an AIX TSM server box to a Linux
TSM server? I'm hoping it's as easy as building the new box (tape
drive,stg pool etc) and then restoring the DB and tweaking the new
config. I know there is more to it than
20 matches
Mail list logo
